2010/3/26 Foster, Margie margie.fos...@intel.com:
Where are the meeting minutes posted?
http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2010/meego-meeting.2010-03-24-19.58.html
Regards,
Carsten Munk
maemo.org distmaster
___
Meego-community mailing list
Hi,
Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, 18:21:09 GMT, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the CWG's mandate is more limited than what the Maemo Community
Council currently covers.[1]
AIUI, one of Dawn Quim's first tasks is to refine the scope of the
CWG; however I'm not sure,
ext Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
There is not a private corporation on the decision making of the
MeeGo project.
May I ask you to clarify this statement? Does this mean that the
MeeGo TSG might possibly be entirely composed of people who do not
On Friday 26 March 2010 17:59:00 Quim Gil wrote:
There is not a private corporation on the decision making of the MeeGo
project. We have the Linux Foundation and the TSG. In the current plan
the TSG tops a pyramid of meritocracy having underneath a release team
and different working groups
I don't question the dedication and
commitment to
Open Source of the people in there even for a second, but at *this
moment*
that makes it non-trivial to defend the 'no company has decision making
control over MeeGo' stance.
I still don't get what are Jeremiah and you want to debate
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:01 +0100, quim@nokia.com wrote:
I don't question the dedication and
commitment to
Open Source of the people in there even for a second, but at *this
moment*
that makes it non-trivial to defend the 'no company has decision making
control over MeeGo'
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The role of the Maemo Community Council doesn't translate here as such.
To an extent, that's true, yes. There's less of a requirement for a
community-to-Nokia and a Nokia-to-community conduit, but I don't
believe the requirement has
