Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Andrew Flegg wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, 18:21:09 GMT, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote: Well, the CWG's mandate is more limited than what the Maemo Community Council currently covers.[1] AIUI, one of Dawn Quim's first tasks is to refine the scope of the CWG; however I'm not sure,

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread Quim Gil
ext Jeremiah Foster wrote: On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Quim Gil wrote: There is not a private corporation on the decision making of the MeeGo project. May I ask you to clarify this statement? Does this mean that the MeeGo TSG might possibly be entirely composed of people who do not

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread Attila Csipa
On Friday 26 March 2010 17:59:00 Quim Gil wrote: There is not a private corporation on the decision making of the MeeGo project. We have the Linux Foundation and the TSG. In the current plan the TSG tops a pyramid of meritocracy having underneath a release team and different working groups

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread quim.gil
I don't question the dedication and commitment to Open Source of the people in there even for a second, but at *this moment* that makes it non-trivial to defend the 'no company has decision making control over MeeGo' stance. I still don't get what are Jeremiah and you want to debate

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread Bernd Stramm
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:01 +0100, quim@nokia.com wrote: I don't question the dedication and commitment to Open Source of the people in there even for a second, but at *this moment* that makes it non-trivial to defend the 'no company has decision making control over MeeGo'

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-26 Thread Ryan Abel
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM, quim@nokia.com wrote: The role of the Maemo Community Council doesn't translate here as such. To an extent, that's true, yes. There's less of a requirement for a community-to-Nokia and a Nokia-to-community conduit, but I don't believe the requirement has

[Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-25 Thread Dave Neary
Hi all, I just created a very rough initial draft of a proposal for an elected meego council, and thought it'd be worth explaining here. http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_a_Community_council From last night's meeting, it's clear that there are 2 bodies who will be doing much of the

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-25 Thread Ryan Abel
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote: So - there's the proposal, for discussion the consideration of the next TSG meeting. Some people may prefer an independent elected body, some people may prefer just to have the community workgroup elected directly, and have

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-25 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, 18:21:09 GMT, Ryan Abel rabe...@gmail.com wrote: Well, the CWG's mandate is more limited than what the Maemo Community Council currently covers.[1] AIUI, one of Dawn Quim's first tasks is to refine the scope of the CWG; however I'm not sure, rereading the log, how I got

Re: [Meego-community] Proposal for meego council

2010-03-25 Thread Graham Cobb
On Thursday 25 March 2010 17:44:39 Dave Neary wrote: I just created a very rough initial draft of a proposal for an elected meego council, and thought it'd be worth explaining here. Thanks, Dave, for kicking this off. I am not sure that this should be part of the Community Working Group (CWG)