Ok,
Somehow I forgot this Btrfs thing, I remember that
there was some discussion about it at some point.
As reasoning from Arjan sounds good, we obviously
now need to do some testing with N900 Btrfs as well.
While filesystem is perhaps not something that must be
the same between devices, it
From: carsten.m...@gmail.com [carsten.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ext Carsten
Munk [cars...@maemo.org]
2010/5/11 harri.hakuli...@nokia.com wrote:
As reasoning from Arjan sounds good, we obviously
now need to do some testing with N900 Btrfs as well.
While filesystem is perhaps not something
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com
On Behalf Of ext Marko Saukko
Sent: 17. toukokuuta 2010 10:46
* If we have some standard items on the agenda for each meeting.
I think that the current blockers for the next N900 release
should be discussed to ensure that each of them would be
handled
Hello,
Sorry for short notice, but we will have our first open N900 project meeting
tomorrow at 9.00 EEST (8.00 CEST, 6.00 UTC, 24.00 PDT)
The place is #meego-meeting IRC channel on irc.freenode.net
See also http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900
For Agenda etc.
(please notify me if you want to
Hello,
There will be more information tomorrow how to get image for N900.
We forgot to do one simple thing in time after some hassle, blaim
me if you want to.
But, please remember that this is Day 1 image, Work In Progress.
So don't set your expectations too high.
Openess of the image is on
Hello Meegos,
As you know, yesterday Handset UX developement was opened in MeeGo. As N900 is
the other hanset reference device in MeeGo, we are of course actively
developing all the required adaptation elements to make it possible to run
MeeGo Handset UX on N900.
From N900 adaptation point
Hello,
During Finnish holiday season (July) the following acting roles are
set to secure efficient MeeGo on N900 execution:
Ameay Palande is acting Team leader for N900 hardware adoption.
-
Carsten Munck is Acting N900
Arjan all,
If I remember correctly some F2F discussions on this topic (on a place close to
Espoo), december deadline is not valid for those components that we are
specifically developing for MeeGo 1.2, like QtMobility 1.2 in question.
If it is not obvious already, this QtM release is designed
Hello,
As Auke said, N900 tech spec would practically be the lowest for usable MeeGo
experience.
That is not so bad, knowing that it is already one year old device and based on
bit older hw.
We have still some unused tricks to make it bit faster and usable, but the good
reference
to todays
Dave all,
Sorry that this came bit from behind trees, I was supposed to have blog post
done some time before this to explain it bit.
But really, like Quim said, there is nothing new on this if you take a look to
what Carsten has already done for N900 and for MeeGo in general.
My name has
Hello all,
From: Thiago Macieira [thi...@kde.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:59 AM
On Wednesday 20. October 2010 07.49.07 Carsten Munk wrote:
Line 72, we really need to spell out that it is ARMv7, EABI, softfp
(for 1.1) as there is emerging
From: Thiago Macieira [thi...@kde.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 6:48 PM
Harri:
I propose, that we don't specify softfp as the baseline for complience,
but rather say that current softfp is temporary phase and we will move
to hardfp as soon as
From: Arjan van de Ven [ar...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:59 PM
On 10/25/2010 4:06 AM, jarmo.k...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed about hardfp (and other) support in the toolchain team.
Current assumption is that hardfp will
From: Thiago Macieira [thi...@kde.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:52 AM
On Monday, 25 de October de 2010 17:35:48 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
this is me, one of the MeeGo architects, opposing breaking the MeeGo API
this lightly.
MeeGo's value proposition is about giving a consistent
From: Arjan van de Ven [ar...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:24 PM
On 10/26/2010 12:18 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 23:52 +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
This is why I was wondering why we're not using hardfp *now* for 1.1.0.
We shouldn't be breaking binary
I have understood that glxgears is opengl program, NOT opengles.
Arjan, are we supposed to have opengl as part of ivi spec ?
Br,
//Harri
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Jalics, Laci
Hello all,
[Disclaimer: I don't know Jarkko Moilanen or hardly anyone from uta.fi, but I
do know many people from tut.fi ]
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Julien Fourgeaud [jul...@lecatalyst.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:47 AM
On
Moro,
In fact we have someone already looking into it ;)
Tommi Keisala is working on it now, but naturally it will
Take couple of days before we have anything concrete.
But I think that Juha can work based on Gypsy or whatever is
The MeeGo API atm. Our work will be below that anyway.
Br,
Carsten, David and Robin,
Thank you very much for this proposal and work already done and started. This
single post alone convinces me that we have not wasted any work on MeeGo (ce),
and that it in fact will have bright future ahead, no matter of the name of the
project , the products based on
19 matches
Mail list logo
