Stage 2 factor = 1
So on my machine the stage 1 gcd saved me 2 stage 2, so about 2 hour of cpu,
but at the cost of about 90 * 230 sec of stage 1 gcd = 20700sec or 5:45
hours. Seems to me that we could save a little bit by forgoing stage 1 gcd.
regards,
David Campeau
SERVICE_CONTROL_STOP:
ssStatus.dwCurrentState = SERVICE_STOP_PENDING;
ServiceStop();
break;
//
// The rest is the same
}
David Campeau,
P.S: I sent a similar message to George Woltman about a month ago, but I
didn't receive any response. Perhaps
t you
can't complete in 60 Days. and reorder your assignment so that the smallest
exponent are finished first.
I've been doing this for about 6 months and let me tell you that it's quite
tedious, there is NEVER a day off :)
regards
David Campeau a.k.a "DiamondDave"
P.S: this can be used f
t). When my computer as
not enough work queued I just raise my limit.
That way I know that exponent are done in a timely manner and they won't be
re-re-assign to someone who is going to "sit on it".
of course it's alot of monitoring:)
David Campeau
P.S: Hope no one (akruppa, madpoo?) got ma
I got the idea to do some factoring with my now slower-than-average
machine (a P133), but I don't want to factor at the current assignments
(in the 9M range); instead I would like to fill up the factor limits of
small exponents to some common value (56 bits or 58 bits or so).
Of course, doing
