L.S.,
from the status.shtml page:
--- Mersenne Exponent Test State ---
Assigned in Tests Cleared Since Last Synchronization
Factoring only: 8683 Factored composite: 13505
Lucas-Lehmer testing : 27314
Hello all,
At 10:09 AM 11/14/2001 +0100, Henk Stokhorst wrote:
--- Mersenne Exponent Test State ---
Prime, VERIFIED : 1
Prime, UNVERIFIED : 1
--
Hi all,
I've exchanged email with the discoverer. It looks like we've found
the 39th known Mersenne prime - not a hacking attempt. Well done everyone!
My verification will complete November 24th. I'll see if I can't get Ernst
Mayer
to do the official different program - different
At 10:19 AM 11/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
There has been an unverified prime reported! It passes the 32-bit security
code that comes on every results.txt line. This is not overly difficult
to forge
though. The user reporting the prime has completed 3 other LL tests and
seems to have signed up
There has been an unverified prime reported! It passes the 32-bit security
code that comes on every results.txt line. This is not overly difficult
to forge
though. The user reporting the prime has completed 3 other LL tests
I think it is quite interesting if this is only his/her 4th LL
Bummer... it doesn't show that anymore. :(
George/Scott: can one of you verify what the situation is? Finding a
new one, even unverified, is big news, but if it's a glitch, we'd want
to know so we don't get our hopes up. :)
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Aaron,
At 11:00 AM 11/14/2001 -0800, Aaron Blosser wrote:
Bummer... it doesn't show that anymore. :(
George/Scott: can one of you verify what the situation is? Finding a
new one, even unverified, is big news, but if it's a glitch, we'd want
to know so we don't get our hopes up. :)
George Woltman wrote:
In fact, one of the reasons I was a little suspicious of the report
this morning
was that I had not received the primenet email. It seems that the
eagle-eyed
Henk Stokhorst may have been the first to know that M#39 was uncovered.
Achim Passauer, also from Europe,
Hi,
at November 1, I saved a copy of Assignments Report. Today I downloaded the
new Assignments Report and the Cleared Exponents Report. Stored the three
files into a database.
Knowing the new prime exponent probably had been listed at Nov. 1 but isn't
listed today .. that's enough.
Doing
For better or for worse (I think for better - it should attract a few
searchers) the new Mersenne report has made it to the popular
technical/open-source/geek news site Slashdot.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/14/1849203mode=nested
Sadly, there are a few errors in this article, at
George Woltman wrote:
Hi all,
I've exchanged email with the discoverer. It looks like we've found
the 39th known Mersenne prime - not a hacking attempt. Well done everyone!
Hooray for us!
The first prime since I started.
Would it be a reasonably easy task to compute and post
At 09:27 PM 11/14/01 -0500, Nathan Russell wrote:
For better or for worse (I think for better - it should attract a few
searchers) the new Mersenne report has made it to the popular
technical/open-source/geek news site Slashdot.
[...]
I couldn't care less about the grammer issues in the
Brian Beesley wrote:
On 12 Nov 2001, at 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Consequent elimination of once-L-Led Mnumbers by second-round
factoring would account for some of the difference, though I doubt
there've been 30,000.
[snip]
70,000 double check assignments would be expected
George Woltman wrote: ...I'll see if I can't get Ernst
Mayer to do the official different program - different CPU architecture
verification
Speaking of Ernst Mayer, lets have a Bay Area GIMPS party!
Same place as before? Ill have the prime rib. {8-] spike
Hey, no fair... you're not going to share the results of your
investigation? :)
I guess we can all wait for verification... sigh...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:mersenne-invalid-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dieter Schmitt
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001
15 matches
Mail list logo
