On ma., sep. 3, 2018 at 11:50 AM, andrey simiklit
wrote:
Hi,
One more small think here:
> +int virgl_encode_set_hw_atomic_buffers(struct virgl_context *ctx,
> + unsigned start_slot,
unsigned count,
> + const struct
On fr., aug. 31, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Gurchetan Singh
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:41 AM Erik Faye-Lund
wrote:
From: Tomeu Vizoso
Emulating atomics on top of ssbos can lead to too small max SSBO
count,
so let's use the hw-atomics mechanism to expose atomic buffers
instead.
Hi,
One more small think here:
> +int virgl_encode_set_hw_atomic_buffers(struct virgl_context *ctx,
> + unsigned start_slot, unsigned
count,
> + const struct pipe_shader_buffer
*buffers)
> +{
> + int i;
I believe that
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:41 AM Erik Faye-Lund
wrote:
>
> From: Tomeu Vizoso
>
> Emulating atomics on top of ssbos can lead to too small max SSBO count,
> so let's use the hw-atomics mechanism to expose atomic buffers instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
From: Tomeu Vizoso
Emulating atomics on top of ssbos can lead to too small max SSBO count,
so let's use the hw-atomics mechanism to expose atomic buffers instead.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
---
src/gallium/drivers/virgl/virgl_context.c | 37 ++
