Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-29 Thread Emil Velikov
On 29 October 2015 at 09:24, Ivan Kalvachev wrote: > On 10/29/15, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Ivan Kalvachev >> wrote: >>> I'm attaching v3 of the patch. Same as v2, but without the extra empty >>>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-29 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 29.10.2015 um 10:24 schrieb Ivan Kalvachev: > Configuring smtp server is too much hassle for a single patch and I > would like to avoid writing my email credentials if possible. > If I'm about to send more patches, then I guess I would have to do that. You might want to look into "git

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-29 Thread Nicolai Hähnle
On 29.10.2015 01:52, Ivan Kalvachev wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Ivan Kalvachev Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:46:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier. To: Nicolai Hähnle

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-29 Thread Ivan Kalvachev
On 10/29/15, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Ivan Kalvachev > wrote: >> I'm attaching v3 of the patch. Same as v2, but without the extra empty >> line. > > FYI, there's a lot of overhead to reviewing an attached patch (in > fact,

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-28 Thread Ivan Kalvachev
-- Forwarded message -- From: Ivan Kalvachev Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:46:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier. To: Nicolai Hähnle On 10/26/15, Nicolai Hähnle

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3] r600g: Fix special negative immediate constants when using ABS modifier.

2015-10-28 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote: > I'm attaching v3 of the patch. Same as v2, but without the extra empty line. FYI, there's a lot of overhead to reviewing an attached patch (in fact, gmail makes it extra difficult since you can't even see the thing in