Hello Bob, McCartney, All,
I think that the trouble, Bob, is that McCartney has been supplying us
with more details than you have, and they do point towards your guilt.
Apparently there was a case filed against you, and you knew about it
- but didn't respond to the court order to argue against
Hello Pete,
I admit that it does sound as though he (McCartney) is in the right,
but all the same...there's a reason they give people the benefit of
the doubt in court, and I see no reason why we should condemn someone
(in this case, Bob) when there is still a chance that he may be
innocent.
The
Olah All,
Looks like a fresh mesosiderite. I know, the shape is odd - but have
a look at fresh pieces of that Chinese mesosiderite fall Dong Umjim
Qui...or however it's spelled...they look rather similar to this,
though by the look of the orange crystals clearly visible on the
surface of this
olivine crystals-- in a
mesosiderite no less--and fresh? It is fresh from the slag pile!
I've got petrified frog poop that looks more like a meteorite then
this.
Pleeease...this is an early April One-0 post, Right?
Eman
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olah All,
Looks like a fresh
Shirokovsky.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Elton, All,
Hardly; I just think it's stupid to rule any sample out completely
without a lab analysis.
There's no single feature on the stone being auctioned that would
suggest that it is not, in fact
Hola All,
For those interested, I just uploaded a whole lot of new meteorite
pictures to my flickr account, available at the following url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cameteoritefinder/sets/72157594532840297/
I would go straight to the 'meteorites' set; there are some other
pictures up, but I
Hola Chris, Eric, All,
Well, I would think that it would be all the more difficult due to the
snow on the ground; assuming that the fireball didn't terminate over
cleared land, the general Area (Northern Oregon to Southern
Washington, at elevations of ~2,000 ft+) are currently under two to
four
Well, E.P.,
I suppose the only trouble would be finding responsible meteorite
hunters who would hunt without disturbing the ancient designs (which
seems fairly hopeless given the historical record of treasure-seekers
in general).
Yes, there are a number of responsible hunters out there, but one
Hello All,
I managed to find a user on Flickr with a good set of shots - see here:
http://flickr.com/photos/apailthorp/2280482061/
If you click on 'All Sizes' just above the image, you get
full-sized...his/her shots have pretty good resolution. There are
probably better out there, but this was
Bob,
On the bottom of his message -
Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
The Asteroid Belt!
---Chicagometeorites.net---
Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999
Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites
...it does work.
Jason
On Feb 12, 2008 6:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
As a
Hola E.P., All,
while in Tucson noticed its low density. I remember
when Michael Casper let me handle one of the first new
martian meteorites back in 1999, and my sudden
understanding of exactly what 1/3 Earth's gravity
really means.
Martian meteorites are as dense as earth rocks; the fact
Hola Laurence, All,
Seems unlikely; here's a picture of the stone:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article93341.ece
Doesn't look very good...
Regards,
Jason
On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 PM, Laurence Garvie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was listening to the London news and they were discussing
Hola Pete, All,
It's a meteorite; it looks to be a piece of Allende or another CV3,
but it's certainly not an Aubrite, and is most likely not from
Australia (why would it be when it looks to be Allende...).
So...an expensive bit of Allende with a shiny tag.
Regards,
Jason
On Feb 5, 2008 12:43 PM,
Hola Bob, E.P., All,
Hardly - the stuff they sell at the Meteor Crater store is shale.
They don't sell real meteorites on-site, though you can find freshly
dug-up irons on ebay from hunters for an average going price of
~$0.30/g.
You'd probably be best-off buying some Odessa nuggets or a lot of
Hola Tracy, Ken, All,
Yes, the colour does look a bit off, but in this case I think it might
be due to odd photography - the specimens' textures actually look
meteoric and some of the pieces reflect light in a way that I would
expect from a weathered ordinary chondrite (oxidized metal appears to
Hola Dave, All,
If you're making accurate labels, you might add 36kg to the tkw of
Tata (listed at 113 kg) - and make that two pieces found, as opposed
to one.
Kem Kem...I have no idea.
Regards,
Jason
On 26 Jan 2008 16:41:59 UT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David and List,
Does anyone have the
Hello Eric,
From the pictures, it's hard to tell, but I would say that it is most
likely an ordinary chondrite. That said, the pictures aren't clear
enough to tell for certain - to me it almost looks a little bit like a
CR2, but I would only be able to tell with a) the stone in my hands or
b)
Hola All,
This was as close as I could get:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.meteoritearticles.com/chatroom.html
But the java programs don't seem to initiate correctly - at least, not for me.
Anyone else have any luck?
Regards,
Jason
On Jan 13, 2008 3:03 PM, dean bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoops - first time this went out, my email was set to rich-formatting
it for some reason.
In case that doesn't go through, here's a plain version.
-- Forwarded message --
Hola Graham, All,
Been busy with college apps these past few weeks, and am getting
caught up with emails
Hola Peter, All,
I know individual aspect of your questions have been addressed, but
I'd like to as well...
I know the Sahara desert is about a galgillion square miles.
Then there are the deserts in Calif., South America, the Antarctic continent
and God only knows where else. Why don't I see any
E.P.,
I said I wouldn't argue the point anymore, but this is just insulting
- after I say I'm to leave, you repeatedly bash me? You're going into
overkill here - one might almost think you're compensating for your
own beliefs with this little romp-around.
Sterling himself just told you that the
Hola All,
1) Thanks Darren, and others who messaged me in private.
2) Pete,
By making such a message public, you most certainly meant it to be
offensive; otherwise, you would have addressed it privately. You
meant for everyone to see it, whether or not you gave the post
adequate thought before
Hola All,
Sterling, you said:
The distribution (or relative absence) of irons in NWA material shows
that there is no doubt that the NWA area was cleaned out of most of
the iron meteorites that could be found thousands of years ago. Of
course, they missed a few. But if the NWA meteorites
thought
of yet.
Sterling K. Webb
- Original Message -
From: Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list
Meaning, what exactly?
On Dec 24, 2007 6:01 PM, Peter A Shugar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sterling,
Is it just me? Or is jason about two tacos and a burrito short of a
combination plate?
Pete
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list
before disagreeing with it. The
source was Dr. Svend Buhl. He's on the List, so maybe you
could ask (politely) how he derived the 0.2% figure?
Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message -
From: Jason Utas [EMAIL
I would say that if you don't care enough to involve yourself in the
discussion - or know little enough about the subject to participate,
that one should simply refrain from throwing comments like that around
- say, those that pertain to nothing other than personal jibes.
Over here we would call
E.P.,
After reading your last post, I've simply come to decide that this is
no longer worth the time.
Your selective replies, paired with your faulty logic - and failure to
even think or reason in a logical manner has left me with little hope
of ever bringing you to your senses.
I met with a few
E.P., All,
To be perfectly frank, I've had enough of you, but I
do like getting the last word in, so here you go.
Why do I have this feeling that this will not be the
last word we hear from Jason?
Probably because we've not seen the last of you either; you're doing
the same thing ;)
Hola Sterling, E.P., All,
Concerning recent impacts (12,000 years old), what
I've noticed over the years is that some people go
into denial, and those denial mechanisms are sometimes
really pretty bizarre. It's tough to accept on a gut
level that as things now sit you, your family, your
E.P, All,
Well, probably, though we have no real proof of their
having been blasted to death *anywhere.*
Denial takes many forms.
Show me proof. Show me blackened bones.
Oh, that's right - there isn't any.
As I said before, I won't say that such events haven't happened,
because in all
to be logical.
Regards,
Jason
Sterling K. Webb
---
- Original Message -
From: Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:11 AM
Subject: Re
E.P.
To be perfectly frank, I've had enough of you, but I do like getting
the last word in, so here you go.
If you stopped lying - and maybe started obeying the
laws of physics, scientific method, not to mention
basic logic, we might get somewhere.
Thanks for the compliment, Jason. I don't
Hola All,
But the main problem is that impact rates have not been constant since
the formation of a solid lunar crust a number of billions of years
ago, and as such, this declining rate biases the results put forth.
Simply put, we're talking about craters having formed in the past ~50k
years, as
the bones, do not,
in my opinion, exist.
Regards,
Jason
Sterling K. Webb
--
- Original Message -
From: Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007
Hello E.P., All,
1) From the descriptions, the spherules in the tusks
appear to be the result of the condensation of iron
plasma, the same as at Barringer crater.
Completely wrong. The spherules from CD are spherules that condensed
out of the atmosphere and fell to Earth as solid spherules
E.P., Sterling, All,
Firstly, it's not my crater, nor my impactites. I
first saw this on National Geographic TV, and had not
even read Firestone's Mammoth Trumpet piece until
Sterling pointed it out to us. This was Kenneth's
team's work.
Well, seeing as you're the only one advocating such a
Sterling, E.P., All,
For the record, I like my peppered mammoth
with lemon butter...
Thick-cut, salt and pepper.
Jason, think about Tunguska. A 25 megaton airburst
that left no crater, no pits, not even the tiniest, no
material remains whatsoever, no isotopic traces in
reliable amounts,
Hello E.P., All,
First off, West was looking for bones from the comet
impact of 10,900 BCE, and found the peppered tusks.
When radiocarbon dated these tusks turned out to be
from 31,000 BCE, and not from the 10,900 BCE comet
impact.
Ok...
Second, there is no terrestrial process that
Tracy, All,
Tracy, you said:
There are a couple scenarios where a good-size impactor could strike
and leave no crater, but create havoc. One is if it made a water
strike close to a coastline, and another is if it struck an ice sheet,
like a glacier, which subsequently melted. Are there any
Hola E.P., All,
Perhaps data from Barringer could throw more light on
the reentry of iron spherules from an iron ground
impact. I seem to remember frei-punkt, a maximum speed
for air entry.
Reentry of iron sperules? Maximum speed? With Canyon Diablo, they
condensed out of a cloud of vapour
E.P., All,
Well, that hardly seems likely; no crater-forming mechanism would
create iron pellets of ejecta such as what occurred on those tusks,
and the likelihood of their being caused by a low-altitude airburst,
though intriguing, seems physically impossible, at least if we're
talking about a
Hello Tracy, All,
I agree, but the main problem is that the spherule-type material from
Canyon Diablo wasn't fired out of anything; it condensed out of a
cloud of vapour that formed as a result of the meteorites vaporization
upon impact. They weren't necessarily hot to any appreciable degree
when
Hello Sterling, Tracy, All,
Sterling, you said, As always, when people dislike an explanation, they
do not search for an explanation that works, they attack the facts for
demanding one.
I agree...kind of. While I do agree that attacking an existing
hypothesis may well be easier than coming up
Hello All,
Unsure if this article has already been posted, but it hasn't arrived
in my inbox yet, so here goes.
Article text below; see link for the picture.
Jason
---
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7128000.stm
Meteorite dates lunar volcanoes
Volcanoes were active on the Moon's
Hello Mike,
~92% of all meteorites are magnetic; all irons, all stony irons, and
nearly all stones are magnetic.
The only meteorites that are not magnetic would be the HED's (some of
these are slightly magentic), as well as Aubrites (though some of
these contain iron as well), planetary meteorites
Hola Adam, All,
I never called it a type three if you read my emails
although I am confident with the designation
scientists with decades of experience assigned it.
Interestingly put. Well, I did read your emails, as well as those
posted by your brother, and, to be frank, although you don't
Hello Adam, All,
Adam said:
It is obvious that this meteorite contains chondrules
therefore calling it anything but a chondrite doesn't
make any sense to me.
Wold Cottage, as well as several Acapulcoites and Winonaites contain
chondrule remains, though the official definitions of such
Regards,
Adam
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Adam, All,
Adam said:
It is obvious that this meteorite contains
chondrules
therefore calling it anything but a chondrite
doesn't
make any sense to me.
Wold Cottage, as well as several Acapulcoites
Larry, Sterling,
Even supposing that there had been some sort of life on Venus, the
odds that the development of life there would have even somewhat
paralleled evolution on Earth is so unlikely as to be, in my opinion,
nearly impossible. Should there have been any life on Venus, it is
logical to
Ed,
The second I tell you when you can and can't pray (as well as for what
you can pray) is the very second that you can tell me when I am able
to use a historical figure's name in any writing I see fit to put to
email or paper or any such thing.
Until then, by god, I'll not pay you any heed
was not accusing him of anything fraudulent with that
statement.
Regards,
Jason
On Nov 11, 2007 10:39 PM, Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill, All,
I just checked the thread: the claims against Leigh-Anne were
unsubstantiated, and, seeing as she is a well-regarded member of this
community (by most
Hello Bill, All,
I'm confused, Bill. I asked you for any evidence of this, and you
failed to respond, but did choose to reply to another message on the
same thread a few minutes later.
I agree with Greg. This most certainly reflects upon you in a sour
light, Bill. To say such things about a
Bill, All,
I just checked the thread: the claims against Leigh-Anne were
unsubstantiated, and, seeing as she is a well-regarded member of this
community (by most), I would suggest that list members not spread
about such rubbish unless they have evidence to back it up. Saying
that there was an
Well, first-off, I'd have to say that you're comparing apples and oranges.
Simply put, the specimen depicted in the first two pictures appears to
have had a sustained independent flight, and has developed a crust
that can truly be deemed 'primary.'
The second specimen seems as though it might have
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/11/05/brighter.comet.ap/index.html
KNOXVILLE, Tennessee (AP) -- A comet that unexpectedly brightened in
the last couple of weeks and is now visible to the naked eye is
attracting professional and amateur interest.
[image]
Comet 17P/Holmes is seen among the
Hello All, Keith,
Are you sure that's not a Gibeon?
I've seen a good few Canyon Diablo's and Gibeon's, and, to be frank,
I've seen a number of Gib's like it, and no CD's that've looked
remotely similar. The patina is pretty typical of Gibeon as well,
rather different than your average Canyon
Hello 'Mckinney Trammell,' All
Right - if I'm not mistaken, the supposed Mojave iron meteorite
similar to Albion, from ebay...well...
It looks like slag/metal production waste (those bubbles are pretty
telling), or maybe the result of some smelting gone-awry. The
texture's rather off for
. Keith is
my friend and when he said it was a Canyon Diablo he was stating the
truth.
On 10/30/07, Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All, Keith,
Are you sure that's not a Gibeon?
I've seen a good few Canyon Diablo's and Gibeon's, and, to be frank,
I've seen a number of Gib's
Hola All,
The trouble with this fellow's logic is namely that he appears to
believe that the study of weathering effects on meteorites is more
important than the study of what is (at this point, probably 'was')
likely the largest fresh sample of the remnants of a solar nebula
currently on the
David, All,
The point is that if such a violent incident had occurred in
rural-any-small-town here in the US, people's minds would undoubtedly
jump straight to the least rational cause - terrorism. You may say
otherwise, but you know it's trueeven though the supposition that
terrorists would
Sure doesn't look like a meteorite...at all
Have a look for yourself:
http://www.ksn.com/news/also/10574416.html
Regards,
Jason
On 10/18/07, Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dailytimesonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071016/NEWS01/71016045/1002/NEWS01
DELAWARE:
Hello All,
Not the usual scammer, etc - this one I just find funny and thought
you might like to see:
http://cgi.ebay.com/GAO-Iron-Meteorite_W0QQitemZ270175803889QQihZ017QQcategoryZ3239QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
or
Hello Dave,
It's always the first weekend in February, or at least has been in the
past, with the party being that Friday night, the auctions over
Saturday (Sat. night = Michael Blood's) and Sunday (Lang's).
Unless there's some odd change for this year (over the past decade or
so, it hasn't
Hello XXX, Randall, etc,
I'm going to take the time to go through this bit-by-bit.
I reviewed the report sent in by Mr. Farmer today and then I asked my
Peruvian wife to her to call my friends in Desaguadero to find out
what the situation is. I read Mike's field report and he had mentioned
that
Hello All,
I've been asked to tell you that there are new pictures up on Mbark's
page - here's the url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
I'd just like to add that, at the moment, Mbark's posted prices are
~1/2 that of what other dealers are asking - for nearly identical, if
not
Hello Tracy, All,
I have problems with the meteorite theory:
1. Meteorites, as this List knows, come in cold, not hot enough to make the
water in the crater boiling, as several witnesses stated.
If the object was indeed large enough to create a crater (and there
does appear to be one
Hello All,
This particular bit really makes me wonder about those fellows up at JPL...
It's not impossible that the crater was left by a meteorite, Yeomans
said, but if so, then the impact object most likely was small, based
on the size of the crater. It would also probably have been a metal
, and was misreported) that a small crater forming
event was much more likely to involve an iron parent? That might be a
reasonable statement.
Chris
Chris L Peterson
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hola,
I'm forwarding this on behalf of Mbark Ait Lkaid - I have no part in
this deal, though I must say that I would at least take a look at the
crust on some of the pieces even if not interested in
buying...freshest lunar material I've seen in a good while.
- Jason
---
Hello All,
I'd like to
Hello All,
Does anyone know the whereabouts of Terry Boswell? He's been
inexplicably unreachable for the past several months at the email
address that I have - if anyone has some current contact information,
I'd be much obliged for it.
Thanks,
Jason
__
Hello Walter, All,
I'll tkae this apart bit by bit.
For example, why does the rim of meteor crater appear squared in some
photos, while in others it appears very round? Perspective? Lighting?
Extremely highly localized tectonic shifting (back and forth)?
It has eroded into a somewhat
And speaking as an American, when half of this country not only
believe in god, but actually believe that the earth was created
between four and eight thousand years ago by their deity, that the
biblical flood truly happened, and that judgement day is approaching,
I think you, Chris, have great
Bleh, sorry for that - I use the meteoritetimes site much more than
meteoritecentral and it slipped - makes sense to me really, as when I
saw the list page, the hit-counter said that it had been viewed a
total of eight times.
Toe me it looks like the nay-sayers have really taken their time to
...
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jason
Utas
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. August 2007 00:46
An: Meteorite-list
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] the ugly weathered chondrite AD? DISGUISED?
Hello Marcin, Dirk, Don, All,
I
And if you have a problem with someone breaking the list rules, you
contact Art, not the other 600 of us out here.
Otherwise you're just being a hypocrite.
Thank you,
Jason
On 8/5/07, Martin Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much.
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Hello Bill, All,
My post was not truly to defned him; I believe that there can be no
good excuse for the way that he uses the list. I do, however, believe
that, regardless of what is written by anyone to this list, that
responses such as those written by a number of list members should not
be
Hello Marcin, Dirk, Don, All,
I, too, am fed up with these posts, but feel obliged to point out that
the list policies (copied here from the meteoritecentral page) read as
follow:
General List Policies
1) Posts need to relate -in some way- to meteorites
2) Be courteous and professional at all
Marcin, All,
I thought that everyone had to agree to a gentleman's agreement for it
to work...for that matter, you seem to imply that we kick people off
of the list for breaking 'gentleman's agreements.'
The eight rules that I mentioned are the only rules that matter with
regard to booting people
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/orl-bk-nasacomputer072607,0,2959788.story?coll=ny-leadnationalnews-headlines
-
From Orlando Sentinel
NASA reports sabotage of computer by worker who cut wires
Marcia Dunn
The Associated Press
July 26, 2007, 4:51 PM EDT
CAPE
Hello All,
This is simply a piece of NWA 4759, to steal Carsten's NWA number.
But, whereas he lists the TKW at seven hundred or so grams, there are
really *at least* 10kg of material. The main mass (at least the
largest stone that I saw) was about as big as my head. The rest of
the stones that
,
Jason
On 6/30/07, M come Meteorite Meteorites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
Da : Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A : Meteorite-list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Oggetto : Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks From Space Picture of
the Day - June 30, 2007
Data : Sat, 30 Jun 2007
Don,
If you can't tell that the stone pictured is a meteorite (without any
doubt), you're an idiot.
Furthermore, do you truly believe it necessary to cut stones such as
this, that display beautiful fusion crust and a broken window into the
interior that undoubtedly reveals a common chondritic
Hello All,
It doesn't matter why the Earth is warming. The fact of the matter is
that people are dying of starvation thanks to the warming (yes, Rob,
it's happening - recheck your data because it's clearly completely
wrong, as far as global trends are concerned), and scientific fact
tells us
Hello Ken, Bill, Mark, All,
Ken's message just informed 600+ people that there was a fraudulent
seller on ebay.
Ben's post told 600+ people that *he* was fed up with reading other
peoples' posts about fraudulent sellers.
This is one of those cases where I would have to say that, without a
/1/07, Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Again Bob,
Could you please send a picture of the cut surface? Doesn't have to show the
micro-etch - I know that would be hard to capture, but just something to give a
rough idea.
Also, could you please send a little more on the history
Hello All,
Usually I don't post find images, but I thought this one from the day
before yesterday was pretty cool.
http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f306/JUtas/DSCN2320.jpg
http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f306/JUtas/DSCN2315.jpg
It's the smallest stone we've ever found, weighing in at
Hello Sterling, Robert, All,
Sterling's right, but to clarify a little; it's a fairly common
postcard showing the excavation of the second largest Brenham mass
(formerly the largest...). I've seen countless cards like this
around...it's one of the two common Brenham cards, and there's most
likely
-With quotes from meteorite dealers Anders Karlsson and Darryl Pitt.
...It's not every day meteorite enthusiasts get onto 'AOL's top news...'
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/and-to-the-winner-goes-the-dinosaur/20070326094009990001?ncid=NWS000101
Updated:2007-03-26 15:55:30
And to
Hello Marcin, All,
It's probably impossible to say precisely what that melt is without
tapping into those gas bubbles and checking out the composition of
whatever gas (if any) is in there.
Just because there is no other melt within the matrix of the meteorite
itself does not rule out the
Hello Rob, All,
Looks a lot more like NWA 4482 to me...just a different pallasite.
I bought a piece of a pallasite that I was told was Al Mahbas as
well - definitely not desert varnished like it, and visually typical
of 4482...
Regards,
Jason
On 3/24/07, Rob Wesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
their collection information.
Michael Farmer
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
Again, you ignore my difference of opinion with you
on the time scale,
after restating a minute ago that it was seven years
ago, etc.
I refuse to further this travesty of an argument.
If you simply
Hello All,
Dr. Wason just emailed both Mike and myself, clearing this entire issue up.
I don't know exactly why this entire argument was brought to the
list's attention, as it was clearly a private matter, and for this I
apologize.
After the ridiculous accusations that Mike posted against John
By the, this is exactly what this list is here for,
the sharing of information, even if it takes some
chatter to get the information shaken out of the
trees.
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
Dr. Wason just emailed both Mike and myself,
clearing this entire issue up.
I don't know exactly why
Elton, All,
Oh, give it a rest - read the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Meteorites,
page 54, first paragraph.
...Every writer that I know of has stated that irons do possess fusion
crusts - Buchwald, Nininger, Norton, the list goes on.
Hell, I would've thought that the pictures of Tim Heitz's Chilean
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people wouldn't qualify Havana as a meteorite, seeing as all
that's known of it is a few little indian beads made out of meteoric
iron. Yes, it's true, they did turn out to have a different chemical
composition than any known iron,
Hello Bill, All,
You should read what you post - check the references section of your
link and you get:
Never published in the Meteoritical Bulletin
Find references in NASA ADS
Haha, don't think I don't do my research too ;)
It's yet to be published, just as I said.
And Mike, it seems as if
Hello Bill, All,
Whoops then, sorry - simply assumed it was public, as it pertained to
the subject at hand; didn't even look at the subject line, though I
did with Mike's following message...I'll get to that in a second.
My Apologies,
Jason
On 3/19/07, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha Ha?
I
for free.
There is little I can do, so perhaps you could ask
about it.
Michael Farmer
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bill, All,
You should read what you post - check the references
section of your
link and you get:
Never published in the Meteoritical Bulletin
Find
Ahh, well, I guess it wasn't to beoff list that is.
I'll start by letting Mike have a good look at the quote he just put down.
Note approved meteorite.
You suggest that I said that it wasn't a meteorite. I, as you can
clearly see, stated that it was merely not approved. Read it if you
don't
401 - 500 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
