Re: [uf-discuss] Microformat Base

2005-12-05 Thread Ryan King
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Chris Messina wrote: On 12/4/05, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I suspect there's just not enough microformatted content out there yet to make it worth Google's cycles parsing it. [2]. But I thought it better to try and prove myself wrong with

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformat Base

2005-12-04 Thread Scott Reynen
Tantek Çelik wrote: Consider adding hReview as well! I did that. I also cleared out all the data and changed it so it doesn't follow links from sites with no microformats, in an attempt to limit the scope a bit. Turns out I don't have the storage space to catalog every URL on the web.

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformat Base

2005-12-03 Thread Craig Ogg
On 12/1/05, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I'd go ahead and play around with a microformat-based alternative to Google Base. So far, I have a basic spider that I set loose from microformats.org to slowly wander the web. When it finds any known microformat-associated class

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformat Base

2005-12-03 Thread S. Sriram
From: Craig Ogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 12/1/05, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I'd go ahead and play around with a microformat-based alternative to Google Base. So far, I have a basic spider that I set loose from microformats.org to slowly wander the web. When it finds any

Re: [uf-discuss] Microformat Base

2005-12-02 Thread Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
On 12/1/05 8:23 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought I'd go ahead and play around with a microformat-based alternative to Google Base. Kudos, Scott! The best revenge is a happy life, but second-best (or perhaps the first step to that) is working code. :-) -- Ernie P. On