In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Frances
Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 07/12/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both Mars and the Moon have been in the news this week:
Where are we, with the 'Mars':
http://microformats.org/wiki/mars
and 'Luna':
http://microformats.org/wiki/luna
proposals?
back atch'ya! You appear to be the major
contributor to both of these proposals, so where are you with them?
I've done everything I think I can (please let me know if I've missed
something) and am waiting for some response from the community.
What specific problems are causing hold-ups, if any?
So far as I can see, the issues are:
*should these be subsets of geo (i.e. add an extra class to
geo, indicating which body is being referred to); or stand-alone
(I'm happy either way; using the former may produce nonsensical
results in existing parsers; this might be deemed of little
concern).
*should there be a class to indicate the mapping convention being
used, or should the uF specify a default (as, I believe, is done
with geo)? (Of course, there could be a default unless
otherwise stated, meeting both needs).
*lack of involvement from the relevant space scientists, not
least as addressed in discussion (and apparent rejection by this
community - or is the jury still out?) of the potential use of a
dedicated mailing list.
*naming issues (if any remain, I think they are relatively
trivial and easily resolvable).
Do you think a straw man might be due?
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/
* Free Our Data: http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
* Are you using Microformats, yet: http://microformats.org/ ?
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
