On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:38 -0500, Chris Griego wrote:
I absolutely agree with Brian's sentiment here that the optional
container class names that exist today have very different semantics.
That's why I maintained them in my proposed option[1] while also
trying to avoid the need for any form
I absolutely agree with Brian's sentiment here that the optional
container class names that exist today have very different semantics.
That's why I maintained them in my proposed option[1] while also
trying to avoid the need for any form of namespacing or notation, dot
or otherwise, in the class
We need more feedback from the community regarding hset. A small poll
has been posted on the various issues surrounding hset. If you can,
please note your preference as to how we handle the hset problem:
1. Please go to the following URL: http://www.advancedsurvey.com/
2. Enter the Survey Number
On May 22, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
using a character that is requires escaping when writing CSS
rules etc.)
Why would we write CSS rules for hset?
For many content authors, one of the main advantages of having data in
a microformat is to easily style it with CSS. In fact,
Colin Barrett wrote:
On May 22, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
using a character that is requires escaping when writing CSS
rules etc.)
Why would we write CSS rules for hset?
For many content authors, one of the main advantages of having data in a
microformat is to easily style it
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:19 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
On 5/22/07, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need a way to create the concept of an audio collection (an album).
The same can be said for video and images - how do you relate these
items to one another?
Chris Griego wrote:
With my proposal for hSet:
h1span id=internal-event class=hset vcalendarInternal/span
and span id=with-client-event class=hset
vcalendarWith-Client/span Events/h1
ol
li class=with-client-event veventspan class=summaryFOO Sales
Pitch/span [...]/li
li
On 5/22/07 9:49 AM, Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm sorry, i'm completely lost now. Are we trying to get a solution to
a non-problem? did we not discuss the whole namespacing '.'
(dot-notation) as a bad idea?
has there ever been a time that we have NEEDED a set container in an
Hello Chris, thanks for your proposal
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 14:50 -0500, Chris Griego wrote:
Thanks Manu.
I think the purpose of hSet can be achieved with a much simpler
approach, nearly simplifying the entire schema of the format to just
the 'hset' class name by leveraging conventions. I
Before you start on a full-blown proposal, can you create a sample
page? I know that personally I'm having trouble mentally translating
your pseudo markup into what the HTML markup would actually look like.
I think I have some ideas on how this could work more simply as a
convention, but without
Chris Griego wrote:
Before you start on a full-blown proposal, can you create a sample
page?
Martin McEvoy already has one set up based on a real-world example:
http://weborganics.co.uk/haudio
There is also the brainstorming page, look at Option #3:
Thanks Manu.
I think the purpose of hSet can be achieved with a much simpler
approach, nearly simplifying the entire schema of the format to just
the 'hset' class name by leveraging conventions. I think my suggestion
lies somewhere between the existing Option #3 and #4. Since I haven't
kept up
Martin McEvoy wrote:
I know there is more mark up but it does use simple class names that
every one can understand
I agree, it does do the same thing. I'd prefer doing something like what
you're suggesting. The only problem that would need to be solved is how
we support sparse grouping with
Martin McEvoy wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:00 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
using brief, descriptive class names
hset is a brief descriptive class name, isn't it?
Yes hSet is descriptive
my trouble lies in what comes after, you are asking users to invent
their own class after that ie,
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:47 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:00 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
using brief, descriptive class names
hset is a brief descriptive class name, isn't it?
Yes hSet is descriptive
my trouble lies in what comes after, you
Martin, to start off - thanks for updating your hAudio examples page...
even though you have issues with the proposal. Personally, I feel that
the XHTML is much cleaner now and accomplishes all of the goals listed
in the grouping-examples page. However, it would be foolish to press
ahead if there
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:00 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
Martin, to start off - thanks for updating your hAudio examples page...
even though you have issues with the proposal. Personally, I feel that
the XHTML is much cleaner now and accomplishes all of the goals listed
in the grouping-examples
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:57 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
After collecting even more grouping examples and performing analysis on
those examples, it is quite evident that we need to support ordered,
unordered, sparse and non-sparse grouping. There are several options
that have been gathered over
After collecting even more grouping examples and performing analysis on
those examples, it is quite evident that we need to support ordered,
unordered, sparse and non-sparse grouping. There are several options
that have been gathered over the past month, listed on the
grouping-brainstorming page:
19 matches
Mail list logo
