Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Christopher St John
On 6/8/07, Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is NOT a bug, it is a feature of NOT having namespace in that you can use the same property across many domains. This IS different than other languages like XML, microformats are NOT the same. I may have elided too much and got the

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 13:31 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: You know guys we DID have a discussion about the use of title in haudio I brought it up when I was trying to conceptualize what haudio would be...

RE: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Joe Andrieu
Martin McEvoy wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 21:57 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: div class=haudio span class=summary title=Blonde on Blonde Rainy Day Women #12 35 /span /div OOPs caught me copy and pasting. div class=haudio span class=summary title=Rainy Day Women #12 35 Rainy Day

RE: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:26 -0700, Joe Andrieu wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 21:57 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: div class=haudio span class=summary title=Blonde on Blonde Rainy Day Women #12 35 /span /div OOPs caught me copy and pasting. div

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes If audio-title or audiotitle violates namespace principles here, then I think we are seriously hitting one of the scaling problems of uF. We have a precedent in honorific-prefix honorific-suffix (ironically, the

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes You can enhance this further if you want to create extra meaning to one of our hAudio's by using a bit of POSH div class=haudio span class=summary title=Blonde on Blonde dfnBlonde on Blonde/dfn /span If you were

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Scott Reynen
On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Martin McEvoy wrote: I think at the time hCard was meant to be identical to the vCard Standard in every way and mach the scheme defined in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt there was no guess work or defining or anything just well established standards for us

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 01:04 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes You can enhance this further if you want to create extra meaning to one of our hAudio's by using a bit of POSH div class=haudio span class=summary title=Blonde on

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Scott Reynen
On Jun 8, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote: Actually, this is a perfect example why hidden data is problematic. I actually think the outright prohibition on it is too strict, but as a general rule, it tends to cause problems. There's not really an outright prohibition on the title

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-08 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:25 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote: On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Martin McEvoy wrote: I think at the time hCard was meant to be identical to the vCard Standard in every way and mach the scheme defined in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt there was no guess work or

Re: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Suda
On 6/7/07, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. How did TITLE come about? --- TITLE is part of the vCard spec, and is now part of the hCard spec. 2. Who created it and how many people signed off on it? --- it came along with hCard. I'm not sure what you are implying about signed-off on

RE: [uf-new] title vs. summary (was: Third attempt at hAudio)

2007-06-07 Thread Joe Andrieu
I would like to suggest audio-title. title itself is already defined elsewhere, in an incompatible way. summary is inaccurate. Many titles are not summaries in any sense of the word: Hey Joe - Jimi Hendrix Beethoven's Ninth Sympony - Beethoven Rainy Day Women #12 and 35 - Bob Dylan The Start