On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Brian Suda wrote:
Quantity does not equate quality!
Right. I think we tend to get caught up in whether or not the
numbers are convincing to our fellow community members, and lose
track of the important question: whether or not the end result is
convincingly
Frances Berriman wrote:
On 12/09/2007, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should call it what it is:
The Accepted Limitations of Microformats
Yeah, that would work.
I have created the wiki page, everyone please feel free to note issues
and add other sections on the page:
Michael Smethurst wrote:
Can I suggest release instead of album? It just captures albums, singles,
eps better...
Your idea has been noted on the wiki, Michael:
http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#album-title_Property
I'm somewhat opposed to changing 'release' to 'album-title' at
I'd second that.
Even if users are just plopping blobs of data that is recognizable to
humans when presented in a blog, but unstructured, we can still make
sense
of those blobs and structure them.
Seeing what people want to do makes more sense that imposing from on
high. That is typical
I have to second this one as well.
In fact I blogged about this some time ago:
http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000583.html
nicely of course, but the reality was that for 2 years, I got slammed
and treated badly by the folks who started it, and then once I made
them sit down and
Mary Hodder wrote:
Appreciate the clarifications. Very helpful. I will get one of my
engineers to run some queries, to see what percentages we have across 27
mil videos and then post them here and in the wiki.
Make sure to ask them to not duplicate data sources. Don't analyze 400
URLs from
Hello Manu, Michael...
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 13:15 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
Michael Smethurst wrote:
Release, podcast and chart?
Oh and playlist for tv/radio episodes
Added a new hAudio ISSUE #10:
http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Collection_Names
I vote we use
Martin McEvoy wrote:
I vote we use something more generic and call audio-title, album-title
or in fact any media related title just media-title, you can re-use it
for albums, podcasts, toplists, downloads, charts, video, images.
Martin,
If we do that, we will lose the ability to differentiate
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:58 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
I vote we use something more generic and call audio-title, album-title
or in fact any media related title just media-title, you can re-use it
for albums, podcasts, toplists, downloads, charts, video, images.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
If we do that, we will lose the ability to differentiate between an
album, podcast, toplist, download, and chart.
Can you explain a bit more what exactly we gain with that ability, in
terms of practical capabilities? How would a hypothetical
10 matches
Mail list logo
