...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110214/05dbb572/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials
Interesting, so you favor the casual user for sure. You must have one size fits
all package. Is it divulging secrets to say what your max-limit, limit-at,
burst-threshold, burst-limits and we already know the burst-time is 1800/1800.
-- Original Message
Has anyone got this working yet between an MT and a Cisco using OSPF as the IGP?
I can get both sides to ping using the /31 subnet mask and even get an
adjacency formed but it doesn't seem to want to exchange routes. Just
curious if anyone else has this working and how they did so?
Eric
--
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110214/4db3c587/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http
RouterOS
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110214/2d4d6df1/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http
I don't know if it is the problem, but you do not have the prefix-length
clause.
On 2/14/2011 5:05 PM, John Babineaux wrote:
if I wanted to block just the network on the pptp connection what would I
put I tried everything I can think of...
best guess is
/routing filter
add action=discard
6 matches
Mail list logo