> Nowhere did I deliberately do anything wrt. field splitting or not-
splitting or joining.
understood.
> I’m somewhat afraid even that, if this is wrong, it’s systematically
wrong somewhere…
could very well be. I even believe that ksh93 might also not do what it
should/intends to do at this
“it should be deterministic/always the same” this is a very good point,
and at this, well, point, I’ve not yet got any opinion.
I modelled the here strings after here documents: first, the first two
“<<” are parsed indicating it’s a here document, then the here document
delimiter is parsed; if
On 22.12.19 21:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Args, hit Return too early.
>
> - contact me in IRC or so if you’re up for SMTP debugging
> -
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_05_02
> for the POSuX reference
thanks (for both pointers!).
--
You
On 22.12.19 21:04, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Almost a good point, considering…
>
> $ x=(a 'b c')
> $ IFS=,
> $ a="${x[*]}"; print -r -- "<$a>"
>
> $ a="${x[@]}"; print -r -- "<$a>"
>
> $ a=${x[*]}; print -r -- "<$a>"
>
> $ a=${x[@]}; print -r -- "<$a>"
>
> $ a="${u:-"${x[*]}"}"; print -r --
