On 22.12.19 21:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Args, hit Return too early. > > - contact me in IRC or so if you’re up for SMTP debugging > - > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_05_02 > for the POSuX reference
thanks (for both pointers!). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of mksh Mailing List, which is subscribed to mksh. Matching subscriptions: mkshlist-to-mksh-bugmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857195 Title: here string behaviour different in mksh and ksh93 Status in mksh: New Bug description: consider IFS=$'\n' x=(a "b c") cat <<< ${x[*]} cat <<< "${x[*]}" cat <<< ${x[@]} cat <<< "${x[@]}" executing this in mksh (or zsh, incidentally) yields the output a b c a b c a b c a b c (i.e. identical output, always inserting first IFS char between elements, for all variants of accessing all elements of the array) while ksh93 (or bash, for that matter) yields a b c a b c a b c a b c (i.e. `*' behaves different from `@' but double quoting is ineffectual). I am not sure whether this is a bug (either in ksh93 or mksh) but wanted to report this inconsistency and to ask for clarification. what I _would_ have expected to start with is, that the above "here string" commands would yield the same output as print ${x[*]} print "${x[*]}" print ${x[@]} print "${x[@]}" which is neither true for ksh93 nor for mksh. is this all good and well and I am only overlooking something obvious? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mksh/+bug/1857195/+subscriptions
