On Wed, 26 May 2004, Timur Bayasitov wrote:
I have the problem with rsync too:
rsync -rtlzv --delete www.apache.org::apache-dist
/var/www/mirrors/apache/dist/
i would turn off compression to start with to see if that helps at all.
e.g rsynv -rltvH
the next step, try not to sync the whole of the
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 01:30 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
frequency: *high*
small sites 4x / hour, bigger ones 1x/hour
That sounds a little more agressive than is really needed. Is there a
reason you are updating more than once a day?
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
We cleared this earlier in the day and blocked the offending party, then
another one came in and blocked everything up. It's getting pretty
annoying.
it is indeed.
If anyone has any ideas on what is causing this or how to avoid it, they
would be
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
Hi Joshua,
It looks like the apache master mirror is full again and needs to
be kicked (and/or people idling on it need to be kicked..)
@ERROR: max connections (25) reached - try again later
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (68 bytes read so far)
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Yes... It is indeed dead and buried: look at http://java.apache.org/ and
you'll see that all projects have been moved...
nod.. ok, so basically it's all moved into jakarta..
and i was/am going to ask about the nature of the other projects
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
OK. That's perfectly valid, and is the reason we make those available via
rsync. Just wanted to make sure you know what you are doing.
i think i do, but it certainly doesn't hurt to get a second opinion (such
as from yourself :-) as things evolve and
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, jason andrade wrote:
Any chance of getting these permissions fixed ?
I am just following up on this from a few weeks ago.
send_files failed to open //faq/maint: Permission denied
send_files failed to open //mail/icalendar
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
put in the dist directory last evening:
Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Henk P. Penning wrote:
In the past, some 'permission problems' could only be solved
by adding more '--exclude' options. Other problems for mirrors,
have gone unsolved for years. The current mirror site looks
abysmally bad: just a directory listing with a header
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Andrew Kenna wrote:
With the point of people relying on binaries, I'm reffering to people
that use up2date from redhat and assume that it will update their apache
daemon.. It might but it only tags the version as 1.3.22 for instance..
Or one other case I heard about in
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
httpd.apache.org is mirrorable, the rsync module name is httpd-site
there have been some changes the the rsync modules available, do an rsync
dev.apache.org:: to get the list
ok - i'd saw that in the new pages - does that mean the new policy is that
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote:
-- requirements: the apache mirror must reside in /.
The local mirror is refered to in index.html as
a href=/dist/from here/a
carry with no local changes ? any chance of defining exactly
what that means ? no local banners ? no
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, James R Grinter wrote:
yeah - if you watch to see what the process is actually doing it spends
a lot of time looking for foo.meta files, foo/meta/, and all of
those things. I think (from vague memory) that each file results in 5
or so stats() of the directory (each of
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
The easist way if you do not want to mirror the jakarta distributions is to
put in a --exclude jakarta into your daily rsync lines
hi andrew,
i don't think its about not wanting to mirror it. it's about the structure
and changes not making a lot of
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
The tier-1 mirror idea sounds like a good one jason as it would relieve the
load on the main site at apache and we would i'm sure be able to simplify
things.
I do think that the ftp site needs to be just a pure distribution point only
with no html
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote:
Ohh no, Apache guys is there attention on this problem ?
-- The 'dist' archive is a big mess now: current stuff, old stuff,
devel stuff; it's all there. It appears, disappears,
appears again.
-- there is not a byte of guidance or
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
Are you people who mirror apache interested in having a local version of the
apache search engine held on your server, meaning that when people goto your
apache mirror and do a search it points to the data held on your server
rather than what is held
hi,
i've asked before but this hasn't happened.
can i please get a mirror location changed
FROM:
http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/apache/
TO:
http://apache.mirror.aarnet.edu.au/
regards,
-jason
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
btw, can i please get you to check to see if mirror.aarnet is listed in
the mirror system for apache ?
it needs to be
http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/apache/
ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/apache/
at the moment the current record doesn't have the /pub
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Devendra Narayan wrote:
With all these discussions about Apache mirrors, I just have this to
say :
We can guess that there would be many types of mirror sites :
1. Those who have enough disk space to mirror everything that Apache group
has to offer -
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Devendra Narayan wrote:
Yes, it is. But, in cases, like ours, where we provide both http and ftp data
it would be a waste to copy the dist twice ( once from apache-site and
once from apache-dist ). Thus, for pure ftp users, we only provide the
data mirrored from the
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Devendra Narayan wrote:
I request you to look at it with more consideration and a historical
perspective.
There probably are many sites ( including ours ) which started mirroring NCSA
htttpd
and later Apache many years ago ( Apache since it's inception ). Now,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote:
I agree. It is better (for users and organizers) to have
fewer complete mirrors than more partial mirrors.
On the other hand, I can't think of a practical reason
why each project (apache, jakarta, etc) can't have its
own, self contained,
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Darren Boyd wrote:
rsync has some error checking and will not delete *any* files, unless
you specify --force-delete (bad idea) if it detects what it sees as
problems.
you should specifically exclude the bugs area (it has had those permissions
for more than a year now)
i
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
yeah i know, I just want to get the thoughts from the apache guys who
maintain the servers mainly ask and Brian as these are the people that need
to make the necessary alterations
i was actually pretty happy with the way it used to be. it appears
to
is anything happening about providing web mirrors for the
various apache projects ? (ongoing saga/question of several
months now)
e.g httpd.apache.org
we're still mirroring the `main' apache area daily, but from
feedback, a number of users have stopped using the mirror and
get stuff straight
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
I am the person that updates the mirrors list on apache.org, I do not have a
problem with this at all. Any comments Ask ?
i wouldn't mind providing a mirror of xml.apache.org too and jakarta and..
hmm, lesse, been asking for around 6 months now :)
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
Just doing an rsync ftp.apache.org:: I get up a whole heap of jakarta and
xml repository type stuff...
but from what i can see, none of the actual web sites. just like there
doesn't appear to be a web site for httpd.apache.org anymore (like there
used
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote:
This is what happens when I tried to mirror this morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cron.daily]# rsync -rtlzv --delete --exclude incoming
--exclude
old dev.apache.org:apache-site ~mirror/apache
dev.apache.org: Connection refused
unexpected EOF in
Still wondering if there are any plans to make the httpd
web pages available ? i think Ask had commented there
was some plans to get the various modules available via
rsync in the future - any timeline ? one of the most
useful things about our local mirror was all the apache
server
hi,
can someone please fix these ?
send_files failed to open //dist/httpd/apache_1.3.19-ia64-ibm-aix5.1.tar.Z.asc:
Permission denied
send_files failed to open //foundation/CVS/Entries: Permission denied
-jason
so pick the closest mirror site to you.
i get:
(mx http://apache.unam.mx [EMAIL PROTECTED])
there ya have it.. the closest mirror to australia
would of course be.. mexico!
-jason
just in case people were interested, the date i can see on files
moved into DELETE_ME was March 3rd.
also people might find it interesting that a lot of the currently
listed mirrors are now truly broken. hmm
-jason
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, jason andrade wrote:
so pick the closest mirror site to you.
i get:
(mx http://apache.unam.mx [EMAIL PROTECTED])
there ya have it.. the closest mirror to australia
would of course be.. mexico!
what
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Gorm Jorgensen wrote:
i'm not sure why you're doing something with multiple steps there.
when you mirror apache, you are getting essentially the correct files, why
not just modify the pointers ?
The problem is that the current design of the HTML does not use
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
BTW, SSIs *are* working. What actually does not work is language
autoselection.
well, are you running apache 1.3.X and i assume you have the content
negotiation stuff working ? i have to admit, i'm not too sure - there
are only one or two sites for
hi,
someone asked me this a while ago and i think i raised it here
but didn't get an answer. then i needed to look at the FAQ
myself and noticed i can't use it on my local mirror.. which
is a bit disappointing.
i can read the FAQ fine from httpd.apache.org, but trying
to read it locally only
Hi,
a couple of suggestions/queries about the apache web server.
o can we please get the absolute line in index.html changed
from:
httpd.apache.org/
to:
/httpd.html
all the apache mirrors have this file, so this way all the
mirrors don't throw people back to apache.org.
o can
I also just had a look in the dist/ directory.. the URL references
there point people *back* to apache.org.. even though files are
local.
It'd be nice if this was modified too :-/
-jason
39 matches
Mail list logo
