On 12/12/2007, at 8:38 PM, Ioan Nemes wrote:
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small
Form Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the
install
fails:
[cut]
Which one contains the install media? (or `done`) [cd0]
Richard Stallman wrote:
Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
Because he tends to be unfriendly.
Assuming and/or judging that someone is unfriendly, is an unfriendly act
itself. Publicly stating on a mailing list that someone 'tends' to be
unfriendly is a
As a last question. Will gNewSense become non-free if I start a
ports-like
software install package project for it?
If your install package has ports for non-free software, then it would
promote non-free software.
If it were included in or recommended by gNewSense, then gNewSense
would
So, an operating system can born free (free as in speech, in the GNU
sense)
and then, become non-free just because some users decided to create a way
to ease installations of software that just can't be shipped with the
system?
You've formulated a very broad description, which
Well, it seems that we have the following pattern:
- gNewSense, if someone finds a non-free program in it, that's no disaster
- anything else, if someone finds a non free program in it, that's
surely a disaster
Please, sir, clarify
The words I posted before ought to
Would it be possible to change login_radius.c actually raddauth.c so that:
1. The admin can change what port login_radius uses, such as the
old datametrics port. It is currently hard coded to radius(1812).
2. Make it so it does not try an empty password 2 times before it kicks back a
prompt
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:40:15AM -0800, Brad Arrington wrote:
Would it be possible to change login_radius.c actually raddauth.c so that:
1. The admin can change what port login_radius uses, such as the
old datametrics port. It is currently hard coded to radius(1812).
2. Make it so it
I have to correct myself a bit: the socket is in CLOSE_WAIT after
receiving the clients FIN (and acknowledging it). The server hasn't
yet sent its FIN, so the connection is properly half closed, the server
_could_ send some data down the line as its part of the connection
is still up. Translation:
On Dec 12, 2007 9:37 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If some users write a way to ease installation of some non-free
program, and distribution D doesn't include this way in its
distribution or publicize it, then those users have done something bad
but distribution D is not
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Richard Stallman wrote:
Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using
that program. It grants the program a sort of legitimacy, and that
is what I am opposed to.
If a library has a book on [insert-controversial-topic-here], does that
imply
On 12/12/2007, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a last question. Will gNewSense become non-free if I start a
ports-like
software install package project for it?
If your install package has ports for non-free software, then it would
promote non-free software.
If it were
Dear all
I have 3 subnetwork in my lan ( 192.168.1.0/24 ( net_a),
192.168.2.0/24(net_b), 172.16.0.0/16(net_c)).
I made vpn tunelin from net_a to net_b also to net_c.
net_b--(vpn-client_b_to_a)--internet
---((vpn_gw_a)net_a)---lan--(vpn_client_a_to_c)---internet--((net_c)vpn_gw_c)
Bellow network
On 12/12/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/2007, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a last question. Will gNewSense become non-free if I start a
ports-like
software install package project for it?
If your install package has ports for non-free software,
List,
I'm running 4.1 GENERIC on 386 and need an interface to PPP, however I
have no X installed. Ideally an program that just uses the ppp.conf
dialers and allows the user to select which to dial.
Maybe it would be easier to just do it myself...
Grateful for any suggestions
mgb
Richard Toohey wrote:
On 12/12/2007, at 8:38 PM, Ioan Nemes wrote:
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form
Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
[cut]
Which one contains the install media? (or `done`)
On 12/12/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/2007, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a last question. Will gNewSense become non-free if I start a
ports-like
software install package project for it?
If
Ioan Nemes wrote:
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
...
Let's install the sets!
Location of sets? (cd disk ftp or `done`) [cd]
Available CD-ROMs are: cd0
Nick Holland wrote:
Ioan Nemes wrote:
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form
Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
...
Let's install the sets!
Location of sets? (cd disk ftp or `done`) [cd]
sonjaya wrote:
[Trimmed for length]
---
==
I can akses comp in net_a from net_b ( ping running application etc)
I can remote comp in net_b from net_a ( ping , remote , print (
jetdirect ), etc )
I
2007/12/12, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
that there is a ports.tar.gz file on the CD.
HOWEVER, that file is not installed by default, and the OpenBSD
install program *does not even give the user the option* to install
ports.tar.gz, be it from CD or otherwise. See here:
On 12/12/2007, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your install package has ports for non-free software, then it would
promote non-free software.
If it were included in or recommended by gNewSense, then gNewSense
would promote non-free software. I trust they wouldn't do that,
Hello,
does arpwatch (or any other kind of such tools you can suggest) supports
watching multiple interfaces at once? I have one physical interface with
several vlans configured on it and the same count of carp interface on
top of the vlans. I would like to have a look at the known-arp addresses
same box ... -current MP, looks like two ddb running at the same time.
# reboot
/etc/rc.shutdown in progress...
/etc/rc.shutdown complete.
sycing disks... done
pSatnoipcp:e dm taxt_enter: lockin g a g ai_n_mspt_ lmoycske+l0fx
ep:a nmiocv:l mtx_enter : lo 0cxki4n(g% eadgxa)i,n%seta xm3
Nick Holland wrote:
Ioan Nemes wrote:
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
...
Let's install the sets!
Location of sets? (cd disk ftp or `done`) [cd]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:11:05AM +0100, knitti wrote:
I have to correct myself a bit: the socket is in CLOSE_WAIT after
receiving the clients FIN (and acknowledging it). The server hasn't
yet sent its FIN, so the connection is properly half closed, the server
_could_ send some data down the
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD 4.2,
there will be no updated package or updated port available?
That is correct.
--
Antoine
How do you gents keep your 4.2 stable OpenBSD server ( read packages,
not system ) bug free?
If I remember correctly, I'm
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, ico wrote:
How do you gents keep your 4.2 stable OpenBSD server ( read packages,
not system ) bug free?
If I remember correctly, I'm not supposed to use 4.2 stable system
with current ports.
Personnaly, I use -current (base+packages) everywhere.
But this is just me.
--
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:37:12PM +0100, Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
Hello,
does arpwatch (or any other kind of such tools you can suggest) supports
watching multiple interfaces at once? I have one physical interface with
several vlans configured on it and the same count of carp interface on
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 06:37, Richard Stallman wrote:
However, if distribution D includes this easier way to install in
its ports system, by doing so distribution D endorses it and takes on
the ethical responsibility for it.
Using the same argument I can say that gcc isn't ethical
There's a vulnxml feed for OpenBSD ports. It should be updated with
critical patches, and those should be pulled into 4.2-stable.
If your business depends on OpenBSD ports, maybe you can sponsor a
4.2-stable build sandbox. I know mine does, and I'm happy to host it.
We're talking at-most 30
Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 9:37 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If some users write a way to ease installation of some non-free
program, and distribution D doesn't include this way in its
distribution or publicize it, then those users have done something bad
but
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:31AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
However, if distribution D includes this easier way to install in
its ports system, by doing so distribution D endorses it and takes on
the ethical responsibility for it.
Nope.
Users have responsability for what they do. We do
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2, there will be no updated package or updated
Hi Otto,
Thank you for looking at this.
My question is now what would be the right way to do this...?
This radius server(AAA) has a 3 try lock out.
Without this patch login_radius checks 2 times with a blank password
which will allow the user only 1 chance to enter a correct password
before it
Hi,
I've a BSD box listening to FTP and SFTP traffic. I can connect to it
fine from within the LAN but I have been unable to reach it through our
NATing firewall. In the past I've had no problems NATing through to the
Windows FTP server that this box is replacing. Current network setup
is:
On 12/12/07, Raimo Niskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* A httpd server socket enters CLOSE_WAIT when the client
closes (or half-closes) its end and sends FIN to the
server TCP stack that replies ACK and enters CLOSE_WAIT.
The socket proceeds out of CLOSE_WAIT when httpd calls
close()
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2, there will be no updated package or
To: list
Richard's words are the essence of the Free Software Foundation and
the GNU General Public License: people _must_ use free software,
people _can_ decide whether to use free software or not, but people
_must not_ be free to exercise that desire. I will explain that last
statement, since
Mine is more free than yours is usually a pointless discussion, even
more so when the participants cannot even agree on the definition of
free. Stallman conveniently omits the fact that his definition of free
was, is and will be at odds with that of a significant portion of the
free software
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2, there will be no updated
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:58:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgedv.net wrote:
i'm currently testing the c-code which is provided there (i'm not
a guru) but the first one does not look that bad (there are some
errors and problems which i do not really have the time right now
to look into).
the
Hello,
First I apologize if this is not the good address to post this kind of
message. I didn't find a 'getting involved' link on the 0penBSD website.
Well, OpenBSD seems to care about quality, so as a developper I thought
this would be a good place to learn how to write better software.
To my
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:58:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgedv.net wrote:
i'm currently testing the c-code which is provided there (i'm not
a guru) but the first one does not look that bad (there are some
errors and problems which i do not really have the time right now
to look into).
I tried using pkgsrc-2007Q3 but it sucks. Updating userland in production
environment with pkgsrc on a non-NetBSD platform is a nightmare.
-Original Message-
From: ico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:53:03
To:Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:Joe [EMAIL
ico wrote:
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD 4.2,
there will be no updated package or updated port available?
That is correct.
--
Antoine
How do you gents keep your 4.2 stable OpenBSD server ( read packages,
not system ) bug free?
I run build
On 12/12/07, Rodrigo V. Raimundo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 06:37, Richard Stallman wrote:
However, if distribution D includes this easier way to install in
its ports system, by doing so distribution D endorses it and takes on
the ethical responsibility for it.
for the time being, I changed the diff to use IPv4 as the default.
I build a (local and unoffcial) snapshot with it and deployed it
on our production servers. There is no problem known to me atm.
And update changed nothing, but allowed me to _optionally_ turn
on IPv6 support.
If you want to
On 12/12/07, Raimo Niskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2, there will be no updated package or updated port available?
* Mathieu Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-12 11:23]:
Hello,
First I apologize if this is not the good address to post this kind of
message. I didn't find a 'getting involved' link on the 0penBSD website.
Well, OpenBSD seems to care about quality, so as a developper I thought
this would
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Interesting for me too, and most probably for others. It became an
interesting discussion of my CLOSE_WAIT problem after all...
To summarize (as I see it):
* pf synproxy state does not affect these CLOSE_WAIT sockets since
the SYN proxy is only active during connection
On 12/12/07, Mathieu Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my mind software quality also depends on ease of use. So I would be
happy to help improve OpenBSD by making it easier to install and use.
But I don't know if you would be interesting by this kind of
'improvement'. I don't want to waste
Hi Deanna,
Yes it appears that you are correct as just KDE does it now. I just
recompiled KDE and that didn't help so next is cvsup, new kernel, and
new world.
Thanks, Rob.
--
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free
our minds Bob Marley, Redemption Song
1. Pick an area that you are interested in.
2. Fix bug / add useful (non superfluous feature)
3. Send diff to tech@
4. Await flames or see diff getting committed
5. Repeat several time until someone notices good quality and you'll get
invited to play
We are always looking for good people.
On
On Dec 12, 2007 6:31 PM, Mathieu Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
First I apologize if this is not the good address to post this kind of
message. I didn't find a 'getting involved' link on the 0penBSD website.
Well, OpenBSD seems to care about quality, so as a developper I thought
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:47:54AM -0800, Brad Arrington wrote:
Hi Otto,
Thank you for looking at this.
My question is now what would be the right way to do this...?
This radius server(AAA) has a 3 try lock out.
Without this patch login_radius checks 2 times with a blank password
knitti wrote:
The problem would be to forget calling ap_bclose() after ending a
connection, either because all data has been sent or the connection has
been aborted. What I can read with some confidence, is that keeping a
socket open beyond sending any data is not intentional, and there is
I've been trying to search for a reason this is happening, but I haven't been
able to find anything. I'm running pftop under OpenBSD 4.2 on a Soekris
net5501 and am getting the following output:
pfTop: Up State 1-57/212, View: default, Order: none, Cache: 1
11:57:07
PRDIR SRC
On 12/12/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why -current? I thought what had fallen behind from lack of resources
was binary packages. Surely OPENBSD_4_2 (stable branch of ports tree)
still has updated ports.
Just build -stable packages from ports (like you did in the olden days.)
Hi all...
Is there any side effect of having both local and remote IPs in the peer
directives in sasyncd.conf?
For example:
server1: 10.0.0.2
server2: 10.0.0.3
carp:10.0.0.1
So, can I have in both sasyncd.conf:
---
peer 10.0.0.2
peer 10.0.0.3
---
The idea is to avoid different
SPEWS is an excellent example of why trusting strangers on the Internet
that you can't even communicate with doesn't work.
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Nick Guenther
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 11:13 PM
To: OpenBSD-Misc
On Dec 12, 2007 11:41 AM, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/07, Raimo Niskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2,
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Interesting for me too, and most probably for others. It became an
interesting discussion of my CLOSE_WAIT problem after all...
To summarize (as I see it):
* pf synproxy state does not affect these CLOSE_WAIT
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:59:50 -0600
Preston Kutzner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to search for a reason this is happening, but I haven't
been
able to find anything. I'm running pftop under OpenBSD 4.2 on a Soekris
net5501 and am getting the following output:
--snip---
I am
I have two OpenBSD 4.2 machines, box1 and box2. They have public IPs
1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2 and a direct Ethernet connection with 10.88.0.1
and 10.88.0.2. They share a carp interface configured for 1.1.1.5
(box1 is the master; preempt is enabled), and pfsync is configured on
the direct Ethernet.
knitti wrote:
* pf synproxy state does not affect these CLOSE_WAIT sockets since
the SYN proxy is only active during connection establishement.
But it is a good to use anyway since it prevents IP spoofing.
Why not? Just test it out. What happen if you get a DDoS on your httpd
as an example,
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 12:25:40 Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port
knitti wrote:
On 12/12/07, Raimo Niskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Now, this will prevent me from upgrading to 4.2.
It isn't so that any pre-4.2-stable will be updated, so you
lose nothing
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:35:36PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:47:54AM -0800, Brad Arrington wrote:
Hi Otto,
Thank you for looking at this.
My question is now what would be the right way to do this...?
This radius server(AAA) has a 3 try lock out.
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am only
saying that using PF in front of httpd will reduce the possible number
of httpd close_wait you might see. By default httpd can only support up
to 256 connections, unless you increase it and compile it again.
I don't understand why
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
knitti wrote:
The problem would be to forget calling ap_bclose() after ending a
connection, either because all data has been sent or the connection has
been aborted. What I can read with some confidence, is that keeping a
socket open
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake Brad Arrington (bradla):
Would it be possible to change login_radius.c actually raddauth.c so that:
1. The admin can change what port login_radius uses, such as the
old datametrics port. It is currently hard coded to radius(1812).
I have no
On Dec 12, 2007 1:11 PM, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why -current? I thought what had fallen behind from lack of resources
was binary packages. Surely OPENBSD_4_2 (stable branch of ports tree)
still has updated ports.
Just build
On 2007/12/12 18:57, Marc Balmer wrote:
for the time being, I changed the diff to use IPv4 as the default.
I build a (local and unoffcial) snapshot with it and deployed it
on our production servers. There is no problem known to me atm.
And update changed nothing, but allowed me to
knitti wrote:
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am only
saying that using PF in front of httpd will reduce the possible number
of httpd close_wait you might see. By default httpd can only support up
to 256 connections, unless you increase it and compile it again.
I don't
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
net.inet.tcp.keepidle
net.inet.tcp.keepinittime
net.inet.tcp.keepintvl
net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit
net.inet.tcp.synbucketlimit
net.inet.tcp.syncachelimit
nope, shoudn't apply, unless my TCP knowledge is wrong or there
is a bug, which makes
I'll test it as soon as I get a chance, currently my laptop gets a page
fault and enters ddb during boot :-/
Also, I could not apply your diff on -current. Below is an updated diff.
BR,
Markus
--- sys/dev/usb/umsm.c.orig Wed Dec 12 22:21:44 2007
+++ sys/dev/usb/umsm.c Wed Dec 12 22:14:21
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:47:00PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
... I was also told that OpenBSD's ports system includes
non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
[William Boshuck replied:]
Strictly speaking, no.
On Dec 12, 2007 10:25 AM, Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A possible solution would be to...
Summary of this thread: RMS doesn't support OpenBSD.
Where here is there a problem waiting for a solution?
Marti
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
Electrical Computer Engineering
The
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:26:13AM -0500, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
There's a vulnxml feed for OpenBSD ports. It should be updated with
critical patches, and those should be pulled into 4.2-stable.
Unfortunately, it isn't that easy. Some updates imply updates of
depending ports (e.g. poppler
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:42:23PM +0100, knitti wrote:
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
net.inet.tcp.keepidle
net.inet.tcp.keepinittime
net.inet.tcp.keepintvl
net.inet.tcp.rstppslimit
net.inet.tcp.synbucketlimit
net.inet.tcp.syncachelimit
nope, shoudn't apply,
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Marti Martinez wrote:
Summary of this thread: RMS doesn't support OpenBSD.
Where here is there a problem waiting for a solution?
Marti for chair of the next discussion!!!
+1
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not calling someone unfriendly and just focusing on the
conversation/technical details at hand, would be much more friendly..
even considering friendship wasn't the subject of discussion in the
first place.
Someone else attacked me on this list for not discussing this with
Hey,
I have been asked if we can setup an IPSEC connection with a Checkpoint
Sonicwall.
Currently I have NO information on the remote end except that it is a
Checkpoint Sonicwall :(
My pass experiences using IPSEC have been on Linux with things like
FreeSwan and OpenSwan.
Does anyone
In the end, the only way to prevent users from running non GPL
software
Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from
running non-GPL-covered software? Not I. I frequently run OpenSSH,
whose license is not the GNU GPL, and is incompatible with the GPL (if
my memory
few mentioned changes. Apples to apples comparisons I say. I adjust
my repositories in a repository browser and poke away. I find java, I
find tools to work with many non-free pieces of software as well.
Could you explain what I adjust my repositories in a repository
browser means,
It was a corrupted OS caused by so many hard reboots. Nothing to do
at all with azalia.
Rob.
--
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free
our minds Bob Marley, Redemption Song
This really does suck... While we as users appreciate developers hard work, A
majority rely on -STABLE for updated and secure 3rd party software..
You really can't expect everyone to use -CURRENT in a production environment..
and it's been made clear that using -CURRENT ports on a -STABLE
Hi,
It takes me 3 or 4 startx's before I get a KDE screen that looks
normal. When it looks bad, the terminal background is black and other
contrast problems exist. Other times it simply locks up in the middle
of starting up.
Has any one else had these problems?
Thanks, Rob.
--
Emancipate
Where is your line in the sand? When does an operating system become
free by your interpretation? When non-free ports frameworks are
hosted outside the official OpenBSD cvs repository? On a server not
owned by the OpenBSD project?
If they are published by someone else,
Not calling someone unfriendly and just focusing on the
conversation/technical details at hand, would be much more friendly..
even considering friendship wasn't the subject of discussion in the
first place.
Someone else attacked me on this list for not discussing this
Little outdated, but this might help:
http://cisx1.uma.maine.edu/~wbackman/vpn/
J
On Dec 12, 2007 2:06 PM, Michael Gale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I have been asked if we can setup an IPSEC connection with a
Checkpoint
Sonicwall.
Currently I have NO information on the remote
Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from
running non-free software? Not I. I think that software is
unethical, and I refuse to install it, or suggest it to anyone. But I
have not proposed that systems actually block its installation.
Yet you were in an interview
2007/12/12, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
running non-GPL-covered software? Not I. I frequently run OpenSSH,
whose license is not the GNU GPL, and is incompatible with the GPL (if
my memory serves).
Richard,
please stop spreading lies (or looking like a fool) by not doing research.
I've never seen a CD/DVD drive that uses UDMA 5, Pretty fast... but I've also
never seen/used SATA extensively..
One option might be to downgrade the drive to UDMA 2 perhaps? see if that helps
any?..
-Nix Fan.
few mentioned changes. Apples to apples comparisons I say. I adjust
my repositories in a repository browser and poke away. I find java, I
find tools to work with many non-free pieces of software as well.
Could you explain what I adjust my repositories in a repository
browser
On 12 Dec 2007 14:54:59 -0800, Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why even have a -CURRENT ports tree?
Um, to have somewhere for new and updated ports to go?
Unix Fan writes:
This really does suck... While we as users appreciate developers hard work,
A majority rely on -STABLE for updated and secure 3rd party software..
Really? You have statistics? I'd be curious to see how many run
stable vs. old releases vs. current.
Why even have a
On 12 Dec 2007 14:54:59 -0800, Unix Fan wrote:
This really does suck... While we as users appreciate developers hard work, A
majority rely on -STABLE for updated and secure 3rd party software..
So why does that majority not provide the skills or the money to
support that facility?
Maybe you
http://www.acay.com.au/~oscarp/tutor/
for all new Openldap users.
thx, and sorry if you don't need this.
-BG
~~Kalyan-mastu~~
All -
This is going to be a lengthy email, Sorry about that, I have question about
running CARP + OSPF, I looked at all the email pertaining to it on marc.info
website?
Network scenario:
I have an ethernet segment (172.21.171.0/24) Cisco 1760 (.1), Cisco 2621(.4),
Dell PowerConnect(.2),
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
