On 1/3/08, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm following the same principles that I apply to others.
I've explained both these principles and my actions; the readers
can judge all aspects for themselves.
I guess I missed the part where you explained how it makes sense to
apply a
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:00:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are
Some here were at CCC 2007. How was it and what plans are there to
correct the recent anti-competency legislation rolled out in Germany?
Regards,
-Lars
On Jan 4, 2008 1:03 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove
from the cc's of your messages.
Who knows?
Perhaps He gets Paid for it, and for this violent defense of insanity
from all the misused funds of FSF
Otherwise why should he
On 04/01/2008, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the same with your recommended system GNU/Darwin:
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/index.php?page=ports
Who also contains instructions to install the such port system.
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will
On Jan 4, 2008 9:14 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:00:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:15:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:03 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove
from the cc's of your messages.
Who knows?
Perhaps He gets Paid for it, and for this violent defense of
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:08:12PM -0700, L wrote:
That is an insult! Why are you being so mean to Marco?
Right, his extreme insults are meaningless and unprovocative.
And why are you being so mean to me too? I read this list too!
You are insulting me!
Right, did the hat fit? Because I said
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:20:50AM +0200, Dusty wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra only ever contributes to this list when its in a
flame war, and always to take up a contrary point of view. He has proved
only one thing. Trolls do exist and their primary form of communication is
to point and
On 1/4/08, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, your accusation that I only participate in flame-wars is
blatantly false.
Secondly, most of my posts on the flame-wars where trying to clear-up
false statements from some people.
Thirdly, some of my posts on the
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:02:09AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Richard, you are too stupid to go and learn FACTS before you open
your big fat lying mouth.
Since you did it three times so rapidly, I am calling you a liar. And
since you refuse to undo your commercial support in
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:29:38AM +0100, Erik Wikstr??m wrote:
file-server which will contain stuff with some emotional value, data- loss.
Houses burn.
Dump/tar scp/ftp offsite to your box or web space.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
This is a unmoderated list and unsubscribed people can mail to it.
If one doesn't want to hear what outsiders want to say, then perhaps
posting should be restricted to list members.
Rui
--
This statement is false.
Today
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
I'll put up a website with all the details and pictures... I'll call
it 'Put Up Or Shut Up' Anyone who wants a crack at recovering data
from the drive may do so (as long as they pay the shipping charges
both ways). If they can name one file that
On Jan 4, 2008 10:51 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:56:03AM +0100, Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
This is a unmoderated list and unsubscribed people can mail to it.
If one doesn't want to hear what outsiders want to say, then perhaps
posting
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:56:12AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
I'll put up a website with all the details and pictures... I'll call
it 'Put Up Or Shut Up' Anyone who wants a crack at recovering data
from the drive may do so (as long as they
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-04 03:55]:
I thought that there was a trend in the industry away from tapes toward
hard-drive-based systems, e.g. virtual tape libraries that are basically
large file servers with far more capacity than throughput.
yes, because decision makers tend
[This message was generated by an automated system.]
I am not on vacation, but I am at the end of a long time delay. I am
located somewhere on Earth, but as far as responding to email is concerned,
I appear to be well outside the solar system.
After your message arrives at gnu.org, I will
On Dec 14, 2007 9:49 PM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You *can't relicense* code under your choice without the author consent
period!
That BSD license gives permission for almost any kind of use,
including distributing the code under other licenses.
I don't think so. The
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:19:03AM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i couldn't help but notice his initials are RMSS, not so far from RMS.
perhaps this is a nome de plume for that other weaselly contrarian, mr.
stallman.
Yet you couldn't help notice the relation with the name as being more
On Jan 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:15:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:03 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove
from the cc's of your messages.
2008/1/4, David Vasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sounds like he is hiding somewhere in Tora Bora.
Regards,
David
Actually I got that message in a private conversation with him as
well, he do reply within 48 hours time frame so I don't think he is
hiding in Tora Bora.
--
Please avoid sending me
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 3:21 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:33:26PM -0700,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:01:44PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Yet, I'm the asshole ?
Aye, a right prick.
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:47:11AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 1/3/08, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/08, Marius Hooge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally don't recommend backups to CD/DVD.
They degenerate rather quickly depending on their quality and
the storage
Hello,
We're all tired of explaining to Richard Stallman about how he's wrong.
It somehow isn't registering with him, that, or he's not willing to
accept his position of being wrong.
Either ways, by replying to his emails we are creating more noise than
required and giving him more importance
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:44:59PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
:-) that was to the guy who called you a troll right?
I said perhaps you are a paid FSF mercenary or as you accused me
delusional :-)
I wish I was paid to only work on Free Software, I'd be much more
productive.
Rui
--
Today is
Dusty wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra only ever contributes to this list when its in a
flame war, and always to take up a contrary point of view. He has proved
only one thing. Trolls do exist and their primary form of communication is
to point and grunt.
What Rui says is so stupid, its not even
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:35:11 -0500, Douglas A. Tutty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:08:08PM -0800, Marco S Hyman wrote:
As for disk destruction... I don't know nor pretend to know what can
and can not be recovered. Take a look at
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Richard M. Stallman - Autoreply Message wrote:
[This message was generated by an automated system.]
I am not on vacation, but I am at the end of a long time delay. I am
located somewhere on Earth, but as far as responding to email is concerned,
I appear to be well outside
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:35:16PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Could we all please stop responding to his emails as well as emails
from trollers like Rui Seabra?
F.Y. You are the troll.
Rui
--
Keep the Lasagna flying!
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 4th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3174
+ No
2008/1/4, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:08:12PM -0700, L wrote:
That is an insult! Why are you being so mean to Marco?
Right, his extreme insults are meaningless and unprovocative.
And why are you being so mean to me too? I read this list too!
You
Rui, I kindly ask you to not remove Richards's e-mail, since he is as
interested as everyone else who follows this thread.
Richard does not receive duplicated e-mail, since he is not in
misc@openbsd.org, so don't hesitate to add him.
Greetings.
On 1/3/08 10:55 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I think you have misinterpreted the principles that I believe in and
live by.
You certainly don't live by what you preach. You are pointed at not one but
various facts to the contrary.
It would be good if you admitted so and stepped over to the
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:21:27 -0500, Harpalus a Como
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Myth? Why are you so upset about this? It's not myth.
The techniques involved in recovering data in the manner Marco and the
NSA,
DoD, and many others describe isn't a matter of running a simple software
tool. It's a
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:08:08 -0800, Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Brad Tilley writes:
performed from the OpenBSD 4.2 install CD. I'll send it to the one
'ISO Certified' company that agreed to examine it. If they cannot
You keep throwing around the 'ISO Certified' tag as if it had
Just a little point. Sometimes precautions are taken
not so much for the sake of what can be done today but
what someone might figure out how to do in the future.
I am not an engineer, but the explanation that I have
heard of how data is read from a wiped drive sounds
plausable (if not possible)
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are subscribed to these
mailing lists.
If they are not, why do their emails get into the mailing list?
Because they sent it to it.
Some moderator enjoys letting flames come
Diana Eichert wrote:
Eric if you were in MI (I really want to make a joke, but I won't)
then you know that techniques related to data recovery from hard
drives would be classified. The intelligence community is not
prone to publicaly publish whitepapers on their operations.
diana
I
Greg Thomas wrote:
Myth?
Have you read this:
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-guttman.html?
You still haven't convinced me as to why I should believe a tax
analyst's rebuttal to a data security analyst's paper. Feenberg has no
expertise in this area, and Gutmann does.
On 1/4/08 3:03 AM, Greg Thomas wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 5:21 PM, Harpalus a Como [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myth?
Have you read this:
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-guttman.html?
Why are you so upset about this?
Myth's that compel people to waste time and energy should be
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Dusty wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra only ever contributes to this list when its
in a flame war, and always to take up a contrary point of view. He
has proved only one thing. Trolls do exist and their primary form of
communication is to point and grunt.
What Rui
On Jan 3, 2008 10:49 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The free software foundation shall not be called free software
foundation.. it shall be called Stallmanist Foundation and the
philosophies are to be outlined as Stallmanism.. not free software.
If you want to campaign
this is way off OT but I'll reply anyway. :-)
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Eric Furman wrote:
You throw out this document like it proves anything.
I was in the military. I was in Military Intelligence
(yes, I know. Hold the jokes)
I also had some experience with the degaussing and destruction
of disks.
On 1/4/08, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet, I'm the asshole ?
Will wonders never cease? You got it right for once. Congrats! Now
quit while you're ahead.
On 1/3/08 11:35 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:10:59PM +0100, knitti wrote:
..
this is becoming OT, but I can't recommend storing HDDs as real
backup solution either. HDDs _do_ have bitrot, and one should at least,
say, once a year, verify that the *whole* disk is
I actually prefer that it does continue.
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
Oh really? Did he not notice the web page where AROS includes
software which emulates an Amiga perfectly, and to do this talks
about stealing the ROM from a real Amiga machine?
Is
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:40:44PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 1/3/08, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that there was a trend in the industry away from tapes toward
hard-drive-based systems, e.g. virtual tape libraries that are basically
large file servers with far more
On Jan 4, 2008 10:38 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are no Academic. You don't belong anywhere near MIT campus. You
just plain don't know how to do research, and then you go around
spreading mistruths.
Richard, you are such a hypocrite. You don't matter any more in
this
that's right, it's there!
eh, Richard, my mom told me once that it is the best thing to tell
truth, even when the truth is salty, as when you start to lie, you
cannot stop and eventually you get all your lies exposed.
Server: Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
I am seeking advice on the security aspects of the configuration of my home
system. I have 2 PC's, connected to the internet via a firewalled NAT
router. The main PC is an i386 P4 used for general computing, the second is
an older i386 P3 which I intend to dedicate to internet banking for maximum
On 1/4/08 6:22 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
How well do tapes written with one drive read on another?
Good, provide you use serious designed tape drives.
Presuably, drives don't last for 30 years.
..
How robust are the drives? How well do they age?
It's difficult to speak for other
On 1/4/08 7:14 PM, Siju George wrote:
http://redfox.redfoxcenter.org/gallery/main.php?g2_itemId=15560
is the man who is spreading all these lies about other decent Free
Software developers.
If you haven't seen him yet!
Don't forget to take a look at the unforgettable all talk no action
Dear RMS,
from the data I get from below
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.gnewsense.org
I just wonder if the gnewsense OS is being distributed through the
very non free OSes
http://www.gnewsense.org/FAQ/FAQ#toc3
you denounce.
Perhaps the website is run by gnewsense
Yes, as this continues you have to say something Theo, but.
I personally prefer the moto If you want it right - you have to do
it yourself.
So please Theo stop wasting your time and continue with your
development of OpenBSD.
The energy you wasting to reply this flame is taken from OpenBSD
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I can do two more: . and ..
Damn. Split it with you 3 ways... :)
-Toby.
--
[100~Plax]sb16i0A2172656B63616820636420726568746F6E61207473754A[dZ1!=b]salax
chefren wrote (shortened):
Don't forget to take a look at the unforgettable all talk no action
character with GNU horns behind the curtain on the paperwork of the
OpenBSD 3.7 release CD.
http://openbsd.org/lyrics.html#37
OK, I promised myself I wouldn't respond again to this thread or its
If you never write cleartext, there is nothing to recover.
http://dlock.com.tw/
Kevin
(P.S. I might be a satisfied dLock customer, if only they'd make it
easier to buy their product!)
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me
On Jan 4, 2008 9:20 AM, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some here were at CCC 2007. How was it and what plans are there to
correct the recent anti-competency legislation rolled out in Germany?
go check www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de. (If that's what you're referring to)
I don't have much
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me it is proprietary when I can't run it in a commercial
context.
you
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary, not that I need that piece of software.
you still don't get to
For some reason, earlier mail on the strawllman-thread did not make it
to the list. I'm copying parts of some of these mails inline. Note
that both mails were CC:'ed to misc@ (so they were intended to end up
on the list. As such, i don't think using them inline here is a
problem)
On Thu, Jan 03,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:49:45PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary,
On Jan 4, 2008, at 14:26, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me it is
On 1/4/08 7:51 PM, Siju George wrote:
http://www.gnewsense.org/FAQ/FAQ#toc3
Ah, don't forget to look here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2007-11/msg00042.html
with:
as we go along we find out now and then that we've got non-free software.
Some scripts have been
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
know what proprietary means. if you don't
understand the big words, stop using them. you also totally failed to
comprehend the license.
No, I understood it quite well.
Yes, no I did not understood it nor not quite never well.
what i find even more
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Neither do you
that's insulting.
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:49:45PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against
Just FYI about security of deleted data..
I purchase used computers for parts every so often. Many of them have
working hard drives in them.
For fun, I analyze the hard drive out and see what I can find.. just as
a little game of mine.
When I run my undelete/recovery tools on them I can
Ok.. well seeing how I got 2 usefull responses after some 30 emails
with most others just randomly emailing _crap_ I decided to search the
web based on the suggestions from Hannah. (the first responder)
I think I am going to try working with THC-SecureDelete
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:29:38PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:35:16PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Could we all please stop responding to his emails as well as emails
from trollers like Rui Seabra?
F.Y. You are the troll.
Why didn't you answer my
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:55:41PM -0800, Jon wrote:
Ok.. well seeing how I got 2 usefull responses after some 30 emails
with most others just randomly emailing _crap_ I decided to search the
web based on the suggestions from Hannah. (the first responder)
I think I am going to try working
On Jan 4, 2008 11:41 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, earlier mail on the strawllman-thread did not make it
to the list. I'm copying parts of some of these mails inline. Note
that both mails were CC:'ed to misc@ (so they were intended to end up
on the list. As such,
On Jan 4, 2008 5:47 PM, dermiste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 11:41 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, earlier mail on the strawllman-thread did not make it
to the list. I'm copying parts of some of these mails inline. Note
that both mails were CC:'ed to
On Jan 4, 2008 3:55 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. well seeing how I got 2 usefull responses after some 30 emails
with most others just randomly emailing _crap_ I decided to search the
web based on the suggestions from Hannah. (the first responder)
I think I am going to try working
rm -P wont work... I looking to clean up deleted data ... not securely
delete a file.
On Jan 4, 2008 5:45 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 3:55 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. well seeing how I got 2 usefull responses after some 30 emails
with most others just
2008/1/5, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rm -P wont work... I looking to clean up deleted data ... not securely
delete a file.
Just create a file and filling it with /dev/zero until it takes up all
the free spaces, then rm -P that file.
Or just use an encrypted file system next time you set up an
Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
Yes, as this continues you have to say something Theo, but.
I personally prefer the moto If you want it right - you have to do
it yourself.
So please Theo stop wasting your time and continue with your
development of OpenBSD.
The energy you wasting to
Todd Alan Smith wrote:
When someone asked him how to make a living of IT without using or
promoting non-free software, his answer was that you don't have to
work in the IT field to contribute to free software, and he'd prefer see
a kernel contributor being a taxi driver than administrating
Rusty Gadd wrote:
I am seeking advice on the security aspects of the configuration of my home
system. I have 2 PC's, connected to the internet via a firewalled NAT
router. The main PC is an i386 P4 used for general computing, the second is
an older i386 P3 which I intend to dedicate to
Not doing any thing strange.. just want to create a binary (foobar)
and create a package so I can add it.** Why I want to do that is
not the question. I know I can tar the install location with +CONTENT
and +DESC etc.. and get done with it.. I would like to know how to
use pkg_create or the
hi
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
can you please provide the command similar to
sha1 foobar
or
md5 foobar
thanks
hi
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
can you please provide the command similar to
sha1 foobar
or
md5 foobar
man cksum
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Jon wrote:
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
can you please provide the command similar to
sha1 foobar
From sha1(1):
The sha1 command is shorthand for
cksum -a sha1
The cksum(1) command can also be used to compute digests
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:24:03PM -0800, Jon wrote:
Not doing any thing strange.. just want to create a binary (foobar)
and create a package so I can add it.** Why I want to do that is
not the question. I know I can tar the install location with +CONTENT
and +DESC etc.. and get done with
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:30:36PM -0800, Jon wrote:
hi
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
can you please provide the command similar to
sha1 foobar
or
md5 foobar
man 1 cksum
The wget he uses is worse.
You can download any non-free software with it and it does not warn
the user at all!!!
I don't object to general-purpose tools just for being general.
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I use wget for personal
But I think the FPGAs in products are more like the possible computer
in my microwave oven: nobody installs software in them, so they might
as well be circuits.
Really? All those wifi/raid/cpu/etc cards/chips out there that need
firmware, you think they're not a mix of
Before you argue that ReactOS is merely a free implementation of Win32
API, let me clarify: if the purpose of ReactOS isn't to run some
Windows-only software S, then what is the purpose of ReactOS? if S was
free, it wouldn't be Windows-only as it would have ported to free
OS's.
If something is harder to copy, it is ethically ok to have a different
standard for this piece of technology.
Seriously, that's what you're saying above. Because hardware may have
to be copied by hand, you consider them ethically not the same.
Yes, that's my position, for 20
My favorite organization, the FSF, was not involved. If
any of my friends were involved, they did not inform me.
Good friends you have then.
More likely they aren't my friends. You may have noticed that the
Linux developers disagree with my philosophy. I know very few of
http://directory.fsf.org/project/Windows32API/
http://directory.fsf.org/project/wxwindows/
http://wxwindows.org/about/credits.htm
see the acknowledgment from one of the softwares endorsed by FSF your
favourite organization.
Forgot to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Forwarded message from Mike Erdely [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 00:55:00 -0500
From: Mike Erdely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to create package example..
To: Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Download ports.tar.gz. Extract it in /usr. Look at
And as a gardener, I'm not sure software will
be my first source of problems.
L, the above quoted text is not mine. You need to be more careful in
the configuration of your replies. I, for one, would appreciate it.
Todd
Sincere apologies..
It was a double and your name should
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:30:36PM -0800, Jon wrote:
hi
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
See the -a option to cksum(1).
or
Type apropos sha256 at the prompt, pick something that
looks promising (e.g., SHA256_Init) and open its man page.
Don't get dejected if the first thing
On 1/4/08, Rusty Gadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1: The P3 will only ever connect to bank websites, which I have to assume
are 'clean' (I might be able to disable scripting for some sites). However
malware may conceivably infect the main PC. Am I right in assuming I need to
run PF within OBSD on
On Jan 4, 2008 10:14 PM, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Todd Alan Smith wrote:
When someone asked him how to make a living of IT without using or
promoting non-free software, his answer was that you don't have to
work in the IT field to contribute to free software, and he'd prefer see
a
keeps objecting that he doesn't object.
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
