The sad thing is you are being more careful with your system design than
your bank probably is. :-/ By the time you are running OpenBSD on your
banking computer, I suspect you have shifted the primary risk to the
other end of the wire...your bank is a bigger risk to your data than you
are.
For example, his Wikipedia article is one sided propaganda:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_stallman
Yeah maybe, but so's the uncyclopedia version! ;)
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman
-B
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wget he uses is worse.
You can download any non-free software with it and it does not warn
the user at all!!!
I don't object to general-purpose tools just for being general.
How about OpenBSD ports system a
On Jan 5, 2008 11:25 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://directory.fsf.org/project/Windows32API/
http://directory.fsf.org/project/wxwindows/
http://wxwindows.org/about/credits.htm
see the acknowledgment from one of the softwares endorsed by FSF your
When someone asked him how to make a living of IT without using or
promoting non-free software, his answer was that you don't have to
work in the IT field to contribute to free software, and he'd prefer see
a kernel contributor being a taxi driver than administrating Windows
workstations (It
On Jan 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I have nothing against running a web site.
you have *nothing* against a distribution that makes it easier to install
Hi!
I wish to use sendmail in base to use a SMART_HOST (my isp's smtp
server), and that SMART_HOST requires authentication. I was told that
sendmail must be compiled with SASL support even if it is only acting
as and smtp client when using AUTH. Is it right? Am I stuck here, and
won't be able
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:09:16 +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 7:54 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e)
I have nothing against running a web site.
you have
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:00:39PM +0100, Daniel wrote:
Hi!
I wish to use sendmail in base to use a SMART_HOST (my isp's smtp
server), and that SMART_HOST requires authentication. I was told that
sendmail must be compiled with SASL support even if it is only acting
as and smtp client when
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Daniel wrote:
I wish to use sendmail in base to use a SMART_HOST (my isp's smtp
server), and that SMART_HOST requires authentication. I was told that
sendmail must be compiled with SASL support even if it is only acting
as and smtp client when using AUTH. Is it right? Am I
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed it, or it wasn't the answer you'd expect or
I found it so irrelevant it didn't even raise any bell.
Anyways, most of your emails have been so rude
While trying to transpose a working two-stage active-passive
firewall from an enterprise network with a _fixed_ public Internet
address to a much smaller home setup that must live with a _dynamic_
public IP address assigned by the DHCP server of my ISP, I observe
that running dhclient(8) on
Are you willing to share the names of those programs ?
Kind regards
Kasper
L wrote:
Just FYI about security of deleted data..
I purchase used computers for parts every so often. Many of them have
working hard drives in them.
For fun, I analyze the hard drive out and see what I can find..
On 2008/01/05 12:00, Daniel wrote:
I wish to use sendmail in base to use a SMART_HOST (my isp's smtp
server), and that SMART_HOST requires authentication. I was told that
sendmail must be compiled with SASL support even if it is only acting
as and smtp client when using AUTH. Is it right? Am I
2008/1/5, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Before you argue that ReactOS is merely a free implementation of Win32
API, let me clarify: if the purpose of ReactOS isn't to run some
Windows-only software S, then what is the purpose of ReactOS? if S was
free, it wouldn't be
2008/1/5, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
On 04/01/2008, at 8:19 AM, Brad Tilley wrote:
One pass from /dev/zero is more than enough for all cases.
I agree that after a single pass of zeroes, getting anything but
zeroes from a fully working, unaltered drive is not going to happen.
But if you remove the digital logic which masks
2008/1/5, Paul Greidanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Stallman wrote:
If something is harder to copy, it is ethically ok to have a different
standard for this piece of technology.
Seriously, that's what you're saying above. Because hardware may have
to be copied by
On 04/01/2008, at 12:21 PM, Harpalus a Como wrote:
Myth? Why are you so upset about this? It's not myth.
The techniques involved in recovering data in the manner Marco and
the NSA,
DoD, and many others describe isn't a matter of running a simple
software
tool. It's a long, slow, annoying
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will probably remove those.
And ReactOS is next?
Does ReactOS recommend non-free software?
If so. please show me what it says, and the URL.
I do not have a lot of influence with
You certainly don't live by what you preach. You are pointed at not one but
various facts to the contrary.
I do practice my own principles, but when you compare the two
you have to be careful not to alter the principles in your own mind.
If you do that, you could easily discover an
from the data I get from below
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.gnewsense.org
I just wonder if the gnewsense OS is being distributed through the
very non free OSes
http://www.gnewsense.org/FAQ/FAQ#toc3
The words being distributed through are not
I guess I missed the part where you explained how it makes sense to
apply a label like not recommended because it supports non-free
software to OpenBSD but not to FSF (emacs, etc.).
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
know where it is.
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This continues the pattern of straw men. Over and over,
people on this list criticize me for doing something which
neither I nor anyone else here actually thinks is wrong.
Please list the names of so called straw men in your
2008/1/6, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will probably remove those.
And ReactOS is next?
Does ReactOS recommend non-free software?
If so. please show me what it says, and
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed it, or it wasn't the answer you'd expect or
I found it so irrelevant it
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:31:10AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that
Okay, someone touched on this so I'll follow it a little further.
Say you pull the platter(s) out of the drive and now start analysing the
data as analog voltage levels and not highs/lows with threshold. Also,
get the data off the platter(s) by driving a head across it in different
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
recommend the installation of those non-free platforms.
Yes, it does. It's even WORSE since these
On Jan 5, 2008 8:19 PM, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/6, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will probably remove those.
And ReactOS is next?
Does ReactOS
2008/1/6, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If
On Jan 5, 2008 11:30 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free
systems should not
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:30:09AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I guess I missed the part where you explained how it makes sense to
apply a label like not recommended because it supports non-free
software to OpenBSD but not to FSF (emacs, etc.).
As I've said, I think it's
On Jan 4, 2008 11:41 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've been working in IT for well over 10 years now. I can promise you
that, had I denounced non-free software, I would not have been able to
pay for my food or my rent/mortgage for the past 10 years.
On Jan 5, 2008 11:31 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
know where it is.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:51:33PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 8:19 PM, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/6, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will probably
On 05/01/2008, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Your PF rules would probably just block all incoming traffic and pass
outgoing traffic. Or if you want to make sure it is used only for your
desired app, block everything outbound 'cept for that traffic destined to
your desired
In response to off-band inquiries...
On Jan 5, 2008 4:41 PM, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 11:41 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've been working in IT for well over 10 years now. I can promise you
that, had I denounced non-free software, I
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind users using non-free software, you shouldn't be
putting the 'Free. ' in
On 1/5/08 3:31 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
You certainly don't live by what you preach. You are pointed at not one but
various facts to the contrary.
I do practice my own principles,
By using and endorsing gNewSense???
It seems you really don't read what's going on there, people
On Jan 5, 2008 8:51 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon me for intervening:
Its alright :-)
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html#javaflash tells the user how to
get these things into a clean OpenBSD system.
I am sure that it doesn't include the words: Zomg! you have to use
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:28:18PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Rusty Gadd wrote:
I am seeking advice on the security aspects of the configuration of my home
system. I have 2 PC's, connected to the internet via a firewalled NAT
router. The main PC is an i386 P4 used for general computing, the
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free
systems should not recommend, suggest, or offer to install non-free
apps.
What is an
On Jan 5, 2008 9:58 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind users
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind
Again this is for RMS.
He does not fix the problem at his end. those are
1) Apologize for slandering other projects who don't come under his control.
2) Do Research to find out the truth
3) Be practical ( Demon+wget )
And all he does is is complain.
1) I made a minor mistake.
2)
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:54:05AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
But I think the FPGAs in products are more like the possible computer
in my microwave oven: nobody installs software in them, so they might
as well be circuits.
Really? All those wifi/raid/cpu/etc
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff to
check for me.
Wait, you have someone else do the research, and this persons opinions
get reflected in
On Jan 5, 2008 11:20 PM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:28:24PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
You are talking about unrelated matters, and mixing our goals with the
ones of your own community.
I represent neither FSF nor OpenBSD. I probably represent the
community which listens to the propagandas put across by both
Then you are misunderstanding OpenBSD's goals which are clearly stated
at the link I provided you and that you obviously failed to read.
I understand the goals that are not written on that page: do what you
like and fight for what you believe in. Goals are just text written in
a stupid web
It was shareware/trialware and I am looking for the name of it...
usually it is right on my Wiki when I make notes.. but I can't find it
there yet.
L505
Kasper Revsbech wrote:
Are you willing to share the names of those programs ?
Kind regards
Kasper
L wrote:
One thing I found was that
That's clearly a rhetorical question.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:30:36AM -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff to
On 06/01/2008, at 1:57 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
Any EE worth their weight in salt understands signal processing. I
do believe a lot of younger engineers have grown up in the 1 0
digital world and forget about analog.
I think the first computers I witnessed in a work place, were actually
On Jan 5, 2008 10:56 PM, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I said everybody, I meant Everybody. Not one person. Applying the
same to OpenBSD, all that the people here do is bitch about and
nothing more.
NO! people here are not bitching, May be you are.
People here are setting the
Unix Fan wrote:
As I've said, I think it's acceptable for free applications to run on
non-free platforms (and say that they do), because this doesn't
recommend the installation of those non-free platforms. But free
systems should not recommend, suggest, or offer
[slight legibility edit]
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:30:36AM -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find
out
the status of the BSD
On Jan 5, 2008 11:28 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I represent neither FSF nor OpenBSD. I probably represent the
community which listens to the propagandas put across by both but
wants to fight back against false marketing and for the right things
TM.
This is your website right?
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:53:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:53, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all that the people here do is bitch about and
nothing more.
Most of the devs in here are busy coding and not contributing to this thread.
Theo and a few others were forced to respond because their project is
being slandered and
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Shane J Pearson wrote:
SNIP
Where a mix of humans, transistors, valves, gears and three-phase
motors/sensors, got the job done.;-)
Shane
No coal and steam?
I had to say it.
diana
Hello mini-RMS,
Happy New Year greetings from gnu.misc.discuss! :-)
On Jan 5, 2008 6:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm not from the FSF.
Yeah, yeah. You're a kind of Richard Bruce Dick Cheney of National
Association for Free Software, aren't you? A kind of fsf
Are register values preserved between function calls on amd64? I'm pretty sure
they are whipped out on i386, but I'm sure about amd64.
Do I need to write parameters to %rbp offset, then follow the x86-abi for
registers to write to before making the function call? When I disassemble C
code, it
Siju George wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:24 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I said everybody, I meant Everybody. Not one person.
Applying the
same to OpenBSD, all that the people here do is bitch about and
nothing more.
NO! people here are not bitching, May be you
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:39:17PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
Here is one:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-March/081313.html
Notice how Theo talks about because their firmware images were not
free enough to ship in our releases
I suppose you can now explain the
On Jan 5, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
I think the first computers I witnessed in a work place, were
actually analog computers (Navy).
Where a mix of humans, transistors, valves, gears and three-phase
motors/sensors, got the job done.;-)
They're still in use as of the
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:51:39PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
Then you are misunderstanding OpenBSD's goals which are clearly stated
at the link I provided you and that you obviously failed to read.
I understand the goals that are not written on that page: do what you
like and fight for
On Jan 6, 2008 12:26 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:28 PM, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I represent neither FSF nor OpenBSD. I probably represent the
community which listens to the propagandas put across by both but
wants to fight back against false
On 05/01/2008, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2: Space for the P3 is limited and I would like to remove its printer
and
print bank statements across the LAN on the main PC (running Linux, or
maybe
FreeBSD in future) using CUPS. Does this introduce security risks?
Why
On Jan 5, 2008 12:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
4) FYI I think the wine project is counter-productive as it enables
running non-free software on free software operating systems, and as
such de-incentivates the creation of replacements.
4.1) but it's free software and its authors
Richard, isn't:
Run GNOME in a **VMWare Player** in a Linux virtual machine.
Or:
Run GNOME on a virtual machine using QEMU on Linux or **Parallels**
for **Mac** or Linux.
promoting the use of non-free software?
http://torrent.gnome.org/
GNOME _is_ a GNU package.
Greetings!
Richard, Linux is not free software, as you have already stated,
please change your religion, so users don't get confused.
Emacs was originally a text editor, but it became a way of life and a
religion. To join the Church of Emacs, you need only say the
Confession of the Faith three times:
There
On 05/01/2008, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use ports. I am not dumb. :P The goals do not specify to encourage
people to use
non-free software, but I see that happening anyway.
And so what? I think you were trying to prove that OpenBSD were not
living up to their goals. Instead
On Saturday 05 January 2008 09:57:54 Diana Eichert wrote:
Okay, someone touched on this so I'll follow it a little further.
Say you pull the platter(s) out of the drive and now start analysing the
data as analog voltage levels and not highs/lows with threshold. Also,
get the data off the
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:28:24PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
I represent neither FSF nor OpenBSD. I probably represent the
community which listens to the propagandas put across by both but
wants to fight back against false marketing and for the right things
TM.
Great. The first step is
Firmware are not free enough when they have a license that does not
allow them to be redistributed with the system.
You are talking of free as in freedom and not price, right? If the
whole point was to avoid paying $$$ in OpenBSD, my bad.
--
Gilles Chehade
--
Karthik
Karthik Kumar wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:20 PM, William Boshuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind
our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is
--- Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use of non-free software is highly harmful to your
computer and ethics.
Please cite a piece of software that can harm my computer merely
because it is non-free in the FSF/GNU sense. And you should probably
qualify that ethics remark with: Should you
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:51:39PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
Then you are misunderstanding OpenBSD's goals which are clearly stated
at the link I provided you and that you obviously failed to read.
I understand the goals that are not written on that page: do what you
like and fight for
On 06/01/2008, at 3:28 AM, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users
installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this
needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind users using non-free
Oh, the real troll just arrived (one more list where he get's to the
kill file).
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 6:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm not from the FSF.
Yeah, yeah. You're a kind of Richard
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:39:17PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:20 PM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users
installing
non free
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:36:04AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Perhaps you could use the banking machine as your main access point,
running apps on the main box via ssh. Would that introduce any
insecurity in the banking machine?
I certainly wouldn't do sensitive things on an X server with
(apologies to Karthik who will receive this mail twice)
On 05/01/2008, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:20 PM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind
Is there any suggested PF setup when using BitTorrent?
Right now, the biggest problem I have when using BitTorrent is watchdog
timeouts.
Thanks,
Brian
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:53:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
... you distribute non-free software.
It has been pointed out on numerous occasions that
this is a false statement.
No, I am a victim
Only because you elect to remain uninformed.
On 1/5/08, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are register values preserved between function calls on amd64? I'm pretty
sure
they are whipped out on i386, but I'm sure about amd64.
Do I need to write parameters to %rbp offset, then follow the x86-abi for
registers to write to before making the
Reid Nichol wrote:
--- Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use of non-free software is highly harmful to your
computer and ethics.
Please cite a piece of software that can harm my computer merely
because it is non-free in the FSF/GNU sense. And you should probably
qualify that
Karthik Kumar wrote:
Firmware are not free enough when they have a license that does not
allow them to be redistributed with the system.
You are talking of free as in freedom and not price, right? If the
whole point was to avoid paying $$$ in OpenBSD, my bad.
The GNG foundation
Karthik Kumar wrote:
It's been a while since I removed links on that page. And
for the information I very much use OpenBSD. Maybe I should change the
title to Free as in beer OSes.
No. Free is free.
Free as in beer is unethical to children who view the website and wonder
what beer tastes
Unix Fan wrote:
L wrote:
Restoring files from FAT partitions is easy.. I use fatback(http://sf.net/projects/fatback)...
I will check that one out..
But either way, no such utility exists to restore data that has been overwritten..
regardless of the algorithms used.
Unless
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:51:22PM -0500, Eliah Kagan wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 12:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
4) FYI I think the wine project is counter-productive as it enables
running non-free software on free software operating systems, and as
such de-incentivates the
The really cool combination of CARP and ifstated enabled a nice
work-around. The attached ifstated.conf works great in my
active-passive firewall cluster setup. At least it survived all
violent testing conducted over the past few hours. But it still needs
to prove itself in the longer term.
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
