Greetings list.
I have a set of four load-balanced carp servers. Here are there
hostname.carp files:
box1: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:0,2:100,3:100,4:100
box2: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes
B!Cnica PresentaciC3n Nacional!
LICITACIONES PUBLICAS y Evaluaciones TC)cnicas y EconC3micas
MC)xico, D.F. - 30 y 31 de Octubre de 2008
El objetivo principal de este importante seminario es que los participantes
adquieran los elementos y prC!ctica necesaria para Preparar, Desarrollar y
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Stephane Lapie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 22, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Stephane Lapie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Stephane Lapie wrote:
Hello,
I am
Hello everybody,
I asked about one or two weeks ago regarding problems of carp and dhcp.
After some more investigation, the dhcpd doesn't seem to be the problem.
That's the situation:
I've two firewalls, running as master/slave pair.
One of my uplinks is a cable connection. Due to the fact that
On 2008-10-23, Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after a few trial i haven't got much chance with the ffsdrv, and
the code seems kinda old
...
if someone have seen some of these projects that are updated or new
around, it would be good to share the info
http://www.fs-driver.org
--
Greetings
Am Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:02:18 +1100
schrieb Gavin Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I attempted the steps based on your experience with ypldap.
I downloaded a snapshot 2 days ago and setup a fresh install on a
virtual machine.
However I get the following after running ypldap:
# ypldap -dv
I already tested it on the command line with ldapsearch. I ran slapd with
debugging on the command line to stderr. It indicates that entries were
found, but you don't see ypldap actually receiving those entries.
Regards.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:04:36 +0200, Uwe Werler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am
Sorry,
ldapsearch works fine sorry. I was referring to ypldap in that issue.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:27:53 +0200, Uwe Werler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then please upgrade to the current version because there was a strange
bug in Rev 1.7 of ldapclient.c.
I already tested it on the command line
* Sebastian Reitenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-10-23 09:26]:
Due to the fact that the provider
only allows traffic from a given MAC address, I had to fake the mac of the
phsical interfaces on the host to be the same as the MAC of the carp
interface. That was the only way I got this working at
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings list.
I have a set of four load-balanced carp servers. Here are there
hostname.carp files:
box1: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:0,2:100,3:100,4:100
box2: inet 10.104.72.0
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
when attaching my Sansa USB player the kernel reports the following:
ehci0: port reset timeout
ehci_freex: xfer=0xd1b11000 not busy, 0x4f4e5155
I get a similar error when I attach my Sansa Clip usb mp3 player:
ehci0:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msn.com.hk
Hello,
I've been trying to install the GNU Image Manipulation Program help
files on OpenBSD 4.3 for a while now, and no luck.
In most other distributions the help files are a separate package, but
there is no OpenBSD package for them and nothing in the ports tree.
I downloaded the help files
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
Ah, so that's why Windows has proven so resistant to spyware
and malware! I've always wondered!
That's evidence of a Slow News Day.
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msn.com.hk
wow, that's a really good
Hi gang. I'm looking at setting up a small box for the new 4.4
release. Does this release support the VIA CX700 chipset? I have
found references to OpenBSD and VIA CPUs and the odd controller but
not the chipset itself. The actual board I'm looking at is here:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
wow, that's a really good point. i think i'm going to switch back
RTFA. b9^b:
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:21:26 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at
Hi people,
I've been asked by wvdputte@ (aka Wim) to remind you all that he is
available to sign autographs today, tomorrow and on Saturday at the
LinuxLiveExpo at Olympia. He also has with him some OpenBSD goodies
for sale including t-shirts, hoods and install media. Please stop by
if you are in
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to ask the community:
Will IKE V2 ever become available on a larger scale and will it
eventually replace V1 sometime?
Regards
A while ago I purchased an alix board.
The plan is to hook up some external i2c sensors to it.
I see the i2c-header on the board, but while reviewing the dmesg I
cannot find anything related to i2c.
Has the header no real function or is the driver for the i2c bus not
written yet or do I need
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msn.com.h
Ah, the first troll of winter! Must
2008/10/21 Don Hiatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just received 4.4 in Vancouver, BC along with my sweet new T-Shirt. :-)
Got my disc yesterday in Montreal.
/juan
bwahahahahahahahahaah that was awesome!
signed binaries, that made my day.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bwahahahahahahahahaah that was awesome!
signed binaries, that made my day.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that
On 16:16:02 Oct 23, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
A while ago I purchased an alix board.
The plan is to hook up some external i2c sensors to it.
I see the i2c-header on the board, but while reviewing the dmesg I cannot
find anything related to i2c.
Has the header no real function or is the driver
If anyone is concerned about their binaries not being signed, please
burn a CD with your binaries contained.
Send it to me.
I will then sign your CD (they make felt markers just for these tasks)
and send it back to you!!
Ted Unangst wrote:
The awesome power of the gmail spam filter had kept
On 2008-10-23, Per-Erik Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the header no real function or is the driver for the i2c bus not
written yet or do I need to enable it in some way?
I don't think it's been written for the CS5536 yet, I haven't checked
but if it's similar to the SC1100 you may be
most likelly /usr/local/sbin is not in your root's PATH, do
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin as root and slaptest should be found.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:50:30PM +0200, soko.tica wrote:
I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
controller according to howto o Danielle
I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
controller according to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able
Hi all!
If I start X with startx command and then open a xterm and run 'ps a', I get:
..
13237 ?? R 0:04.69 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -auth /home/gar/.serverauth.6053
(Xorg)
18053 ?? I 0:00.01 X: [priv] (Xorg)
9547 p1 Ss 0:00.02 -ksh (ksh)
1024 p1 R+ 0:00.00 ps -xa
26534 C0
What other information can I provide on this?
-HKS
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, (private) HKS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD 4.3.
I'm trying to get a couple IPSec VPNs up and am running into
increasingly bizarre behavior in my test environment. The current
issue is that packets are
Hi,
I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
IGR-64315brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.
I used IBM Server Guide to create array.
My server has 4GB RAM. HD is
I got a mistake.
My hard drives are SAS, not SATA.
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 14:49
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879
Hi,
I am
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:49:11PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
IGR-64315brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard
I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
succed, let me know.
I believe raid controller is not supported.
Regards,
Gustavo.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM
2008/10/23 John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
succed, let me know.
I believe raid controller is not supported.
Hello,
I'm not sure if this could be of any help, but I had very similar
problems with installation of Linux,
What do u mean with mini menu after post?
I created RAID using IBM ServerGuide 7.4.13
I also tested with no RAID.. it also failed.
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Marcin
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 15:50
Para:
How about a dmesg?
You can yap all day long but if you don't provide what people need to
help you you'll get no good answer.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:33:48PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
What do u mean with mini menu after post?
I created RAID using IBM ServerGuide 7.4.13
I
Post your config files and you will be more likely to get correct answers,
otherwise it is more of a guessing game.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:24 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:54 PM, mak maxie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
Uhm WRONG, my embedded Linux distro's that I build for my clients only run
signed
Finally here is the dmesg
OpenBSD 4.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #645: Wed Mar 12 11:31:03 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2
GHz
cpu0:
Wow, that sure makes a good sound byte... but
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms08-067.mspx
I rest my case... No one thing is the end-all be-all of security.
Signed binaries... my ass...
s
From: mak maxie
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:54 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
IGR-64315brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.
It's the same problem i had with the IBM x3650:
Adaptec ASR-2120S rev 0x02 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 not configured
The driver is not enabled by default.
I established conversation with Adaptec, and i will post all of it
soon.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:24:27PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de
I just got an email from Marcos Laufer and he already contacted Adaptec.
It seems he have some 'news'.
I hope they are good news.
I was reading his posts and I am very disappointed with Adaptec and IBM.
I will also email them about it.
I also found this:
I just got an email from Marcos Laufer and he already contacted Adaptec.
It seems he have some 'news'.
I hope they are good news.
If Adaptec had good news, they would probably have told us here is
the documentation you asked for in the last 6 years since we asked.
There is nothing they will
Theo,
I will keep bothering Adaptec and IBM then.
There is a popular speech in my country ( I am brazilian). It is: I am
brazilian and I WILL NEVER GIVE UP.
One day they will wake up and I hope to be alive to see it happening.
Btw, Is this true: http://mongers.org/openbsd/hardware
Cause there
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, Is this true: http://mongers.org/openbsd/hardware
Cause there you said you use adaptec. Wow.. how come?
If it not work under openbsd, you should not even suggest/say their
name. right?
Wow. You can find
If you read the nearly top line of that page you'll notice that it request
that you read the date of the message before going ape shit.
Unfortunately, Adaptec has fallen from OpenBSD Heaven.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ricardo Augusto
I installed 4.4 (current) on Dell 2950, dmesg at the bottom, I am
having trouble seeing the Intel quad port PRO/1000 QP card in OpenBSD.
When I look into /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/{pcidevs, pcidevs.h} I see that
the chipset is listed, Does it require a firmware of some sort,
because em(4) does
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Prabhu Gurumurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed 4.4 (current) on Dell 2950, dmesg at the bottom, I am having
trouble seeing the Intel quad port PRO/1000 QP card in OpenBSD.
When I look into /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/{pcidevs, pcidevs.h} I see that the
okay some of you have suggested ext2ifs and ffsdrv, both prog might
work with bsd configured as primary on a secondary drive , but mine is
on the same drive as windows in an extended partition, (8)
ifs and ffs are as sloppy as a welfare recipient
so far i have found that
Obviously someone made a mistake running that story, as April 1st is
still over half a year away.
Breeno
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, mak maxie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mak maxie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 3:54 AM
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
URETIM ve SUREC YONETIMINDE YENI DINAMIKLER ZIRVESI
21 22 Kas}m 2008 / Cuma Cumartesi / 09.30 18.00 / ]stanbul Hilton /
900 YTL+KDV
w w w b o s p h o r u s c o n f e r e n c e sc o m
Bug|n bir i~letme, bir |r|n|n|n k|resel pazarda yer edinmesini
hedefliyorsa, |retim faaliyetlerindeki
57 matches
Mail list logo
