Can't you use /upgrade.site[1]?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#site
On 4 December 2012 21:59, Frank Brodbeck f...@guug.de wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:44:59PM +, Heptas Torres wrote:
Thanks. What I meant was more things like the script
Hello people,
I found a dell 'floppy drive module' (3.5) for my
hw.vendor=Dell Inc.
hw.product=Latitude D630
hw.serialno=6P8454J
When inserted (before boot) it shows up as (full dmesg below):
umass0 at uhub7 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 Sony USB Floppy
Drive rev 1.10/6.01 addr
This is what I use to re-ports, re-src comfortably
Both good for 1st and following times
I named it re-portssrc
---
#!/bin/sh
plain=$(echo '\033[0m')
redfg=$(echo '\033[1;31m')
greenfg=$(echo '\033[1;32m')
From: MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at
Sent: Thu Dec 06 14:02:09 CET 2012
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: floppy attached as sd with notebook bay, fdformat(1)
Hello people,
I found a dell 'floppy drive module' (3.5) for my
hw.vendor=Dell
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:02:09PM +0100, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
umass0 at uhub7 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 Sony USB Floppy
Drive rev 1.10/6.01 addr 3
umass0: using UFI over CBI with CCI
scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: SONY, USB-FDU,
Hello,
I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X the
way I want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent
manner, with some applications putting its windows only on monitor0,
while others
Quoting Gregory Edigarov ediga...@qarea.com:
Hello,
I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X
the way I want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent
manner, with some applications
I don't know anything about
spectrwm (or KDE or X for that matter :)
You can have two displays in xorg.conf or one split in two on two
screens as well as some other modes. There are various benefits to each
depending on the need for dragging and fullscreen etc.. So an app can
remember the
Hello,
I am a happy user of spectrwm, trying to configure a dualheaded X the way I
want. I now have two monitors connected to the same card.
what I want is that my monitors to behave in completely independent manner,
with some applications putting its windows only on monitor0, while
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production ready,
gnupg-like, BSD
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Maximo Pech mak...@gmail.com wrote:
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more
On 12/06/2012 08:10 PM, Maximo Pech wrote:
that there isn't a single production ready, gnupg-like, BSD licensed
tool out there (I don't have the skills and time to program one
myself).
NetBSD has netpgp, which is BSD licensed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpgp
2012/12/6 Maximo Pech mak...@gmail.com:
I'd like to know your thoughts about this.
Shut up and show us your code.
Maximo Pech wrote:
It's incredible for me that OpenBSD, an operating system that claims to
have integrated cryptography (yes I know that the cryptography is on the
core OS layers) doesn't have in the base system a tool like gnupg, and
even more incredible, that there isn't a single production
now I got the installation log of current trying the amd64 distro:
-
CD-ROM: 9F
Loading /5.2/AMD64/CDBOOT
probing: pc0 mem[620K 2046M a20=on]
disk: hd0+* cd0
OpenBSD/amd64 CDBOOT 3.19
boot
booting cd0a:/5.2/amd64/bsd.rd: 3046708
8]=0xb8eb78
entry point at 0x1001e0 [7205c766,
Hello,
This is 5.2 on sparc64.
Both in BIND9 admin guide and in man named.conf the option blackhole is
present.
Nevertheless, this is the story:
# named-checkconf -t /var/named/
/etc/named.conf:111: unknown option 'blackhole'
Now, the idea is to create an acl of possible fake IPs of spoofers
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
This is 5.2 on sparc64.
Both in BIND9 admin guide and in man named.conf the option blackhole is
present.
Nevertheless, this is the story:
# named-checkconf -t /var/named/
/etc/named.conf:111: unknown option 'blackhole'
Well,
thanks for answer, but I still get the same problem. I tried to put
blackhole out of zone statement in the general area, but the error is still
the same:
# grep blackhole named.conf
blackhole { spooferz; };
# named-checkconf ./named.conf
./named.conf:18: unknown option 'blackhole'
I'm
OK,
now got the soultion. I moved the statement blackhole within in the options
{} and now is accepted.
I was trying to use it in zones, which is not recognized.
Sorry for the noise.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Well,
thanks for answer, but I
OK, as we all predicted, this was just a PEBCAK. It works find whether [a] or
[d].
Thanks for the help - I appreciate it.
Cheers,
-- Greg
--
View this message in context:
http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/softraid-to-encrypt-AND-raid-tp219721p219997.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc
20 matches
Mail list logo
