On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 03:49:12AM +, Philipp Buehler wrote:
> Am 12.08.2023 03:13 schrieb Chris Bennett:
> > I can't figure out how to match the outgoing mails to the correct IP/mx
> > they are coming from. Just one server, different A records for the mx
> > versus domain name.
>
> Difficult
Aug 12, 2023 01:43:10 mich...@mlpdesign.com:
>
> Ask: I'm curious to hear from others if v2 is more aligned with your desire
> for the look of the updated site.
I think is much better. And I think that when you align to standards it is
difficult to lose in readability.
I'm just checking by my
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 03:49:12AM +, Philipp Buehler wrote:
> Am 12.08.2023 03:13 schrieb Chris Bennett:
> > I can't figure out how to match the outgoing mails to the correct IP/mx
> > they are coming from. Just one server, different A records for the mx
> > versus domain name.
>
> Difficult
Am 12.08.2023 03:13 schrieb Chris Bennett:
I can't figure out how to match the outgoing mails to the correct IP/mx
they are coming from. Just one server, different A records for the mx
versus domain name.
Difficult to understand what you're trying there...
I kinda understand that you have
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 20:11:02 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> When did it become an assumption that we would adopt any of these
> changes?
I don't think that it did become an assumption, but as a number of
people have responded to the initial design, to the point that the
designer offered a
Hi Theo
No assumption on my part at least.
I’d hugely value hearing you input if you have time though.
E.g. are you open to these types of updates. If so, which parts would &
wouldn’t you be supportive of. Etc.
Thanks in advance.
On 2023-08-11 21:11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
When did it
> On 11 Aug 2023, at 21:08, Marko Cupać wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have star topology network where dozens of spokes communicate with
> other spokes through central hub over GRE tunnels protected with
> transport-mode ipsec.
>
> This worked great for years, but lately all the locations got
Hello,
as I was updating to the new IP ranges, I changed ~all to -all
(My old IP's were crap filled with spam, so I just didn't send mails to
the big guys.)
I tried sending to gmail.com and got smacked that the spf was referring
to an unexpected address on the server.
I found that I was getting
When did it become an assumption that we would adopt any of these
changes?
I'm going to add my couple bits worth.
Summary: I prefer v2 apart from line length; a max might be better.
I'm reading on a laptop with a fairly large display (1920x1200), using
Chrome.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:33:03 -0500, mich...@mlpdesign.com wrote:
[snip]
> What's Changed in v2:
>
- Forwarded message from Chris Bennett
-
To: misc@openbsd.org
From: Chris Bennett
Subject: I would like help matching my outgoing domains to the right IP for
smtpd
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:13:59 -0700
Hello,
as I was updating to the new IP ranges, I changed ~all to -all
(My old IP's
Hi all
Ok, here's is update2 to the design. Note: I still need to break this
down into individual patches for review but wanted to get feedback on
the aesthetics first.
v1: https://www.openbsd.design/cvs/www/index.html
v2: https://www.openbsd.design/cvs/www2/index.html
What's Change in v2:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 5:56 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-11, Tim Baumgard wrote:
> > I'm having an issue with my Protectli FW4B that's become more of a
> > problem lately. Essentially, it's the same thing that this person [0]
> > encountered.
>
> IIRC those are the machines that
On 2023-08-11, Tim Baumgard wrote:
> I'm having an issue with my Protectli FW4B that's become more of a
> problem lately. Essentially, it's the same thing that this person [0]
> encountered.
IIRC those are the machines that have problems if there's no display connected
I'm having an issue with my Protectli FW4B that's become more of a
problem lately. Essentially, it's the same thing that this person [0]
encountered.
I'm having keystrokes momentarily freeze when typing via ssh and am
getting some ping spikes that happen anywhere from every 10-30 seconds
and
j...@bitminer.ca said on Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:52:18 -0600
>- font size is too small; but so is the original. Lato at 14px is
>similar to Times Roman at 16px in words per line but it's still too
>small. (Chrome on windows, 100% zoom).Try 14.5px and
>letterspacing 0.1px and see if this is
David Demelier said on Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:48:05 +0200
>On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 14:01 -0500, mich...@mlpdesign.com wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> WHAT:
>> =
>> I greatly respect OpenBSD; while I don't have OS tech level expertise
>> to contribute - I do have some design skills and wanted to
When I first saw it there was this "aha" feeling that it was a big
improvement. Good stuff!
Then I read a few of the comments and looked at the pages with a bit
more of a critical eye. So here are some comments and suggestions:
- font size is too small; but so is the original. Lato at
On 2023-08-11, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have star topology network where dozens of spokes communicate with
> other spokes through central hub over GRE tunnels protected with
> transport-mode ipsec.
>
> This worked great for years, but lately all the locations got bandwidth
> upgrade
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 01:08:07PM +0200, Marko Cupać said:
Are there any commands I can run which would indicate ipsec traffic is
being throttled due to hardware being underspecced? top shows CPU is
more than 50% idle. netstat shows ~1 Ierrs / Ifail (no Oerrs /
Ifail) on interfaces that
Hi Mark
On my desktop with dual 4K screens @3840x2160 (16:9) resolution the new
design is basically illegible because the css wrongly determines this
to be
a high resolution small screen (aka phone) which is a step backwards,
browser-zooming to 200% is not really an option because that also
Hi,
I have star topology network where dozens of spokes communicate with
other spokes through central hub over GRE tunnels protected with
transport-mode ipsec.
This worked great for years, but lately all the locations got bandwidth
upgrade (spokes: 10Mbit -> 50Mbit, hub: 2x200Mbit -> 2x500Mbit),
On my desktop with dual 4K screens @3840x2160 (16:9) resolution the new
design is basically illegible because the css wrongly determines this to be
a high resolution small screen (aka phone) which is a step backwards,
browser-zooming to 200% is not really an option because that also changes
the
On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 14:01 -0500, mich...@mlpdesign.com wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> WHAT:
> =
> I greatly respect OpenBSD; while I don't have OS tech level expertise
> to contribute - I do have some design skills and wanted to contribute
> to the community and project.
>
> So I created a new
24 matches
Mail list logo
