That's some sad shit Theo. She apologized.. Sheesh.
Flame me for it .. But someone had to say it. Come on
Guys.
What's your specific issue, Sophie? Maybe someone else
can help?
D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sophie L
Sent:
Heya :)
well, I don't know about BSD in general, but just try it with
OpenBSD. If the machine is generally capable of this task
(has the mem and power to suppert n sessions in parallel),
it's just your task as admin to make it happen. The means are
there. If your users bring down your
* Wolfpaw - Dale Corse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-19 05:13]:
you, BSD does not stand up to it .. Now I admit - it was years ago,
and it was FreeBSD that we tried
yeah yeah, and we all know that OpenBSD is just ErsatzFreiBSD with
another name on it, right?
sheesh.
Correct me if I am
You may well be right, though I would say that the amount of Code
changes users would be required to do, to make it work
Would end up in
my lap, seeing as there are some things OpenBSD's Kernel does not
have, or has fairly out of date versions of
One example I can think of is
I wasn't whining - again - how the hell is justifying what I said
whining?
You are saying our libpcap is buggy, but you fail to justify
that claim.
No I didn't, I said it was out of date. You want me to justify it?
Here.
Making all in .
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -DIPV4_ONLY
-Original Message-
From: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:58 AM
To: 'Henning Brauer'
Subject: RE: Guruness (was the bug report thread)
Correct me if I am wrong, but its still a monolithic
kernel, based on
the same
, 2005 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse
People -- just ignore him.
He may use OpenBSD, but if he can't stop himself from being a
beligerant fool, not submitting the right reports, why bother
wasting eveveryone's time by chit-chatting and arguing with
him? Do
If you can port it, you can also use it on your own box, so
where is the problem?
No problem there.. Actually looking at the couple of functions I need
here to see how difficult to integrate they would be.
login.conf (5)
Problem comes into play when a user starts say .. 50
Copies of
Turning this into a learning experience: Does anyone have
any hints or advice about hardening OpenBSD for shell
accounts. Do people tweak things other than the login.conf
settings? I have to deal with student shell accounts where
students are learning to program and often create
On 10/19/05, Wolfpaw - Dale Corse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quickly. I try not to use limits, because it slows
compiling to crap
:(
this makes no sense whatsoever.
To clarify, if you limit someone's ram use to a certain point, or
CPU use to a certain point, it will slow down compiling
Yes, that would be the idea of limiting resources. If I am
given the ability to use 99% of the CPU compiling software,
how is that different than me running a fork bomb and doing the same?
In essanse I suppose it isn't - but if your (as in my case) selling shells,
compiling is legitimate,
Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to
openbsd. he uses
mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
weeks later he
switched it back linux and said : linux much faster to respond the
http requests (he had a same configuration on openbsd,
It dropped to DDB (because I forgot to disable it :( and I did The
following:
First thing you should probably do is actually read what is
on the screen and actually send the output of ps, trace and a
dmesg(8). Else, you're not going to get much reliable support.
RTFM -- it's a good
Happy Birthday to OpenBSD, and kudos to the devs for a brilliant
product :) We love it :)
-D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ken Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:17 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD's 10th
Shrug.. Ok .. I'll keep my bug reports to myself from here on in, since
it seems someone asking for some help, which may not realize the information
provided was not entirely what was required is to receive a fairly rude reply,
which, rather then saying - hey, please send this.. It would be
Hessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:35 AM
To: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD Kernel Crash in uvm_fault or
uvm_rb_remove (not quite sure which it originates from)
You refused to follow the instructions printed on the screen
You're kidding, right?
Nope.. Apparently I suffer from lack of sleep, and GDB syndrome,
I looked right at the crash line, and didn't even pay attention
to what was above it. My apologies for that - didn't even notice
it.
You were asked to send a ps and a trace. You sent what you
thought was
asked 100 times (Just last week :)
That is my simple 2 cents - love me, hate me, whatever.
-D.
-Original Message-
From: Spruell, Darren-Perot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 1:03 PM
To: 'Wolfpaw - Dale Corse'
Subject: RE: OpenBSD Kernel Crash in uvm_fault
snip for brevity
Diddo.
- That also being said, as Darren pointed out below, we have
a group of
people on this list, in particular the devs (but others too
I am sure)
that have some serious UNIX skills. I personally, came from
the Linux
Cisco world primarily, but Unix has its
19 matches
Mail list logo
