-2013 05:34, nixlists escreveu:
Hello,
OpenBSD has this package. Is it trustworthy? Anyone uses here?
I believe this works with OpenDNS, and a few other providers of secure
recursive caches that support dnscurve through this package. DNS is
probably never going to be secure against attacks
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Nicolai nicolai-om...@chocolatine.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 02:34:10AM -0500, nixlists wrote:
Hello,
OpenBSD has this package. Is it trustworthy?
Yes, it is.
Fine, I'll believe you :D
Have to trust someone at some point, and you don't sound like
Hello,
OpenBSD has this package. Is it trustworthy? Anyone uses here?
I believe this works with OpenDNS, and a few other providers of secure
recursive caches that support dnscurve through this package. DNS is
probably never going to be secure against attacks in our lifetimes (but,
hey, maybe
Hi. After an upgrade from an older snapshot of -current to the
yesterday's snapshot any attempt to write to /dev/ulpt0 results in
Device Busy. For example echo test /dev/ulpt0 returns Device
busy. Older (several months old -current) kernel didn't have this
problem.
Thanks.
OpenBSD 4.8-beta
Hi.
I upgraded from a few months old -current snapshot to the August 1
i386 snapshot, and now any attempt to write to /dev/ulpt0 (my usb
printer) results in Device busy. Booting with the old kernel - no
problem, I can print. Is this a bug in the new snapshot? Is anyone
else having issues with
FWIW if I connect (boot with) my RAID enclosure to my eSATA card, the
problem goes away at shutdown time. Any ideas?
On 3/14/10, Anders Langworthy lagrang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:44 PM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org
wrote:
Now getting back to the link/problem
Hi. I installed a recent -current on an SD MMC card. Boots just fine
with an old SanDisk reader, but most times at the time of shutdown
(shutdown -h now) the kernel hangs at Syncing disks., and I have to
power down manually. When it comes back it has to fsck of course.
Shut down works fine on a
On 3/5/10, Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
2010/3/5 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
Also unrelated, but I am using FireFox in this install to write this
message and it is painfully slow. This is on an Athlon 64 X2 4200+. I
am using .mp kernel. Is it supposed
On 3/5/10, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Well, sometimes we fuck up -current.
Not on purpose, but it happens.
If you run into a broken snapshot, you may have to wait a few days until
a new snapshot hits the mirrors, usually with everything fixed.
... and so, your system may be
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
The other problem, that gets mentioned is some people are forced to
run -current because some packages will only work with -current, and
backporting sucks for many reasons.
Unless you're running one of those, it
On 3/5/10, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
look for the `-p` flag.
Know all about it. The problem is the kernel won't even get to that
point - it hangs on syncing disks... stage.
spamd is great, but I need to filter other traffic. I still wonder how
people manage to download and convert blocklists for loading into pf
in an automated way as a cron job. Has anyone attempted to do this?
Often there are syntax errors in the lists, sometimes transfers fail.
IOW it's unreliable,
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at searching.
mailing.openbsd.tech is on Google groups, I don't see
mailing.openbsd.misc. Searching on Google groups works quite well,
would be nice to see this list there.
2010/3/4 Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com:
What are you trying to accomplish?
I would be interested on helping you but first I would like to understand
it
better.
I really think all those task can be easily automated via scripts and pfctl
to load the netblocks on tables.
Have a nice
Odd. I search/browse a few months back into archive at least, and not
because someone tells me to do it, and I still don't find answers
sometimes (and searching still sucks, but ignore my whining).
Having contributed to MARC I think it's a pretty good site. Hank has also
added lists, as in the PCC lists, when I requested.
I didn't say MARC is a bad site.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
-current is typically safer by default since all those errata in release
versions are already fixed in -current snapshots. No patches, no builds.
just update to latest snapshots, other than time to update
But has a point. Mail archives are dead as an interface. Google
knows all. We should be asking 'Did you ask Google?' rather than
'Did you search the mail archives.' I'm sure many people have to
go Google 'mail archives' to figure out what they are anyway. :-).
Ken
I like it as much as
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
You are talking about two separate issues.
Stability is not related to security directly.
The two are intricately combined but not the same.
But both are related to downtime and data loss. I understand
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:58 AM, and...@msu.edu wrote:
But both are related to downtime and data loss. I understand stability
bugs are likely to pop-up more often with current, and this has been
my experience. Weird freezes without panic that I did not have with
release/stabe, and some
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:28 PM, and...@msu.edu wrote:
If you don't have a good understanding of things, I'd say you should
By good understanding do you mean ability to read and write system
code, and intimate familiarity with *nix internals?
...
not follow -current on machines that are
Does anyone use blocklists of addresses for blocking spam and other
unwanted traffic, such as those from okean and other places? How do
you manage download and conversion/loading of blocklists?
Automatically through scripts or manually? .
Thanks.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Setting the controller to AHCI would give OpenBSD access
Could someone throw a clue stick? I've read the man pages for netstat
and route, and I am still not clear what the output of netstat -r
means exactly in OpenBSD. What does Link refer to exactly? It seems
that many, if not most man pages do not describe utility output much.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Robert info...@die-optimisten.net wrote:
nixlists wrote:
The idea is to limit memory such that running out of RAM+swap is not
possible, or unlikely. You can set the limit on the allowed number of
processes as well.
I do use ulimit / login.conf for some
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
Exchange, Groupwise, Lotus, various Unix setups. You name it.
Day to day, no errors, no hardware going flakey, then anything will
work. In 'most' cases you will be suffering huge performance loses for
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:50 PM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
My anonymous friend, you need to accept *PEOPLE* write software. Those
little things like experience, skills, and even personality are present
in the output of programmers.
Of course, but this was about his
Just to remind:
rename() causes the link named from to be renamed as to. If to exists,
it is first removed. Both from and to must be of the same type (that is,
both directories or both non-directories), and must reside on the same
file system.
rename() guarantees that if
What are you running? Exchange??
Redundancy is nice, but email back-ups are futile. Backups might save
from most, but not all lost messages after a crash.
Anyway, before we divert to a some other topic, someone please answer
the question for the simplest case - we've already decided that every
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
You are positively ignorant. No need to regurgitate this all over
again. Take your toy mail implementation and enjoy your hair.
You are still refusing to give a direct answer to a direct question.
How's that not
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:35:48PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
You are positively ignorant. No need to regurgitate this all over
again. Take
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
I gave you the answer several times but I'll humor you and do it one
more time.
No, you didn't, see below.
This thread started here:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=126435421227560w=2
After I replied to that message
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:11 PM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
DJB does great work and thinks about his code. Like every great
programmer, DJB wants his code to be as correct as possible within the
very well known bounding limitations (hardware, compilers, operating
systems, file
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
sysutils/anacron
Right, but I think this is something base should handle more
gracefully. The
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jonathan Thornburg
jth...@astro.indiana.edu wrote:
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=126356588306613w=1,
Marco Peereboom slash () peereboom ! us wrote
You can do everything right all day long in software but hardware does
what it does and claiming
When configured as documented - no controller write-back cache (maybe
with a battery back-up, but batteries fail too), no drive write-back
cache, no async mounts, no known buggy stuff.
Which hardware??? Could someone at least point out one example of such
hardware?
I, and, I am sure many
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:22:08PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jonathan Thornburg
jth...@astro.indiana.edu wrote:
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=126356588306613w=1,
Marco
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
I specifically wrote above When configured as documented. No admin
will run a mail server with write-back cache enabled on either
controller or drives (well, maybe with a battery back-up, but I'll say
again that
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
nixlists wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
I specifically wrote above When configured as documented. No admin
will run a mail server with write-back cache enabled
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:55 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't understand what a solution can be. If they're never going to
release
supporting documentation anyway, does it really make a
difference for them?
I don't know if I am buying into a troll or a flamebait, but what
Hi.
File doesn't exist locally, getting it:
ftp -C -o somefile http://someserver/somefile
-blah blah and progress bar-
Got it, retrieve it again:
ftp -C -o somefile http://someserver/somefile
-blah blah and progress bar-
ftp: File is already fully retrieved.
Now over proxy:
export
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
qmail tries to be very careful that a message is on the disk.
Does OpenSMTPD do this? The answer could be yes or no. How is that
nonsensical?
Thanks!
Only very big fool can write e-mail SW which don't try to
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:05 PM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:55:37PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
...
More like does OpenBSD have a similar reliability feature that qmail
does - pertaining
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org
wrote: qmail's queue, except for bounce message contents, is
crashproof on
the BSD FFS and most of its variants.
smtp ensures reliability by working on a temporary queue during writes,
then commiting messages (all of them,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
smtp ensures reliability by working on a temporary queue during writes,
then commiting messages (all of them, including bounces) to the real
queue using an atomic rename. after a successful rename, smtpd tells
the
2010/1/15 Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com:
On 14 January 2010 G. 00:44:06 nixlists wrote:
Hi.
How do I know how much memory I need to have on a machine to load a
table from a file (I don't have much RAM)?
Look at the /usr/src/sys/net/pfvar.h, you'll see definitions of all
structures used
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Inna Kholodova
inna.kholod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Mark! I'm from Armenia :)
And we are using OpenBSD on our production servers for a very long time.
Are you working for the FSB?
Does it have the same reliability features as qmail on an FS without
softupdates? What about with softupdates?
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Denis Doroshenko
denis.doroshe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/14/10, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it have the same reliability features as qmail on an FS without
softupdates? What about with softupdates?
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ben Calvert b...@flyingwalrus.net wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:09:03PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
Sorry, forget I mentioned softupdates. Does it do what qmail does?
Reliaibility-wise?
qmail's queue
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, forget I mentioned softupdates. Does it do what qmail does?
Reliaibility-wise?
qmail's queue, except for bounce message contents, is crashproof
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:55:37PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, forget I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Mark Lumsden m...@cyodesigns.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there any OpenBSD users in Yerevan, Armenia? For work reasons, I'm
moving there in a few days for probably the best part of six months. I
know absolutely no-one there so it would be good to go for a beer with
Hi.
How do I know how much memory I need to have on a machine to load a
table from a file (I don't have much RAM)?
How much memory does a single ip address take in the table?
Do simple 'block quick' rule anchors use more or less memory than
tables (I presume more)?
I couldn't find this in the
Hi.
I have
match in all scrub (tcp reassemble no-df random-id max-mss 1440)
in my pf.conf (-current)
Unless I remove 'tcp reassemble', one of the web sites (it's a
Windows/IIS) site cannot communicate with me - it hangs loading a
page.
Any ideas?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I really like the 275 - 420MBit/s change for 4.6 - current with pf.
Update: both machines run -current again this time. I think my initial
tcpbench results were poor because of running cbq queuing on 4.6. The
server has
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
pf enabled on just the tcpbench server: with cbq queuing enabled on
the internal interface as follows (for tcpbench only, not for real
network use) - no other queues defined on $int_if:
altq on $int_if cbq
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
* nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com [2010-01-14 03:21]:
test results on old P4 are unfortunately pretty much pointless.
Why?
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.52
GHz
Isn't 2.52GHz
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com [2010-01-06 09:33]:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I really like the 275 - 420MBit/s change for 4.6 - current with pf.
Disabling pf gives
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:40 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
My MacBook Pro's wireless doesn't work, which is a big thing for me...I
couldn't get X to work, either.
Does MacBook Pro have one of those mini-ePCI cards that can be
replaced, or is it soldered on-board?
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:12 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
Either way, I'd either have to spend money on a replacement mini-PCI card or
a USB wireless card. I'd rather just buy a new laptop; I don't like the
hardware scheme anyway (with the EFI partition and all that instead of
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com [2010-01-11 02:20]:
If I'd want to buy a laptop, I'd want nothing else than the recent
MacBook or MacBook Pro
stockholm syndrome
Hostages don't shop around for captors.
Nice try
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:23 AM, open...@pckswarms.ch wrote:
Windows XP, vista, and 7 happily will print to a lpd printer. In the
windows world this is called a port, and, lpd is one of the options.
It's 12 pages of idiot blather, but, you can see the XP setup (or maybe
2000
setup) here:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
It was removed because it was out of date and didn't contain anything
really useful. Laptops basically work just fine with OpenBSD minus some
moody ones.
MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
MacBook? MacBook Air? PowerBook? Supported at all?
PowerBook? Sure. But I don't see how this is related to i386-laptop.html.
Oops. Meant MacBook Pro. Sorry.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I really like the 275 - 420MBit/s change for 4.6 - current with pf.
Disabling pf gives a couple of MB/s more.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Bret S. Lambert blamb...@openbsd.org wrote:
Start with mount_nfs options, specifically -r and -w; I assume that
you would have mentioned tweaking those if you had already done so.
Setting -r and -w to 16384, and jumbo frames to 9000 yields just a
couple of MB/s
Hi.
I think I mentioned that I upgraded one of the machines running pf
from 4.6 to -current.
Noticed that pf rule order behavior has changed, so I had to move
rules around and I of course had to change nat and rdr rules since the
syntax is new.
I've read the man page, but not clear on
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
nat and rdr are now declared with match rules.
But 'pass' still works:
pass out on em0 inet from 192.168.1.0/24 to any flags S/SA keep state
nat-to (em0) round-robin
An issue today was the box totally froze after I
Hi.
I have:
sili0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 CMD Technology SiI3132 SATA rev 0x01:
apic 3 int 8 (irq 11)
scsibus0 at sili0: 2 targets
The manual page does not mention it, but I guess the driver does not
support port multipliers? It only detects one drive in my eSATA
enclosure. There are two
Hi.
My softraid mirror went into degraded mode (on -current). How to
rebuild? I am trying to follow the bioctl manual page, but I don't
seem to understand the command to throw at it - syntax errors. Is it
supported yet?
Thanks.
Hi.
I have two machines one running 4.6, the other running a recent
snapshot of current. tcpbench reports maximum throughput of 275 Mbit -
that's around 34 MB/s between them over a gig-E link. What should one
expect with an el-cheapo gig-e switch and 'em' Intel NIC and a msk
NIC? Is that
Hi. I need to print from Windows machines to an OpenBSD box using IPP.
Is CUPS the only software that will let me do this? CUPS is huge,
buggy and full of security holes. Wants to only run as root as well.
Thanks.
Hi.
I am logging 'misc' messages from pf, and seeing a lot of state
reuses. What does it mean, and do I need to fix anything?
Many, many messages like
pf: state reuse TCP out wire: (0) 2ipaddress:port_goes_here
ip_address:port_goes_here stack:
(0) ip_address:port_goes_here
Hi.
What are the recommended newfs tweaks for an FS that will store mostly
large or very large files? Are defaults sufficient for optimum
performance, or are they mostly a general case for typical OS small
program/text files? Also my guess tweaking with tunefs is useless,
since it's a very old
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be best put this way - if you go for the lowest bidder, in
most cases you get what you pay for. Your results aren't too bad
considering what's in use.
Thanks. Where could I find more info on tuning jumbo
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:28:28PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
Hi.
What are the recommended newfs tweaks for an FS that will store mostly
large or very large files? Are defaults sufficient for optimum
performance
It takes either a masochist to run original NTPD, or you are being tortured.
If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
or are the chances of that are very low as far as this OS goes? Long
time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD because
I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have, and they were
quite shaky. Or do
On 12/31/09, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:56:03 -0500 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha
Hi. What's recommended as far as recent mini PCI wireless cards go -
compatibility and performance-wise? I'd like to upgrade my laptop from
a /g to an /n card. Which n cards do you use and find fast/having good
reception?
Thanks.
On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well. Same
problem. I assumed alpha worked...
You're right! It seems I did give you bad advice. I'm sorry about that!
I tried
Hi.
The OpenBSD 4.6 errata OpenSSL TLS renegotiation patch
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.6/common/004_openssl.patch
breaks stable release of Tor as described here (exactly the same issue
on FreeBSD):
http://archives.seul.org/tor/relays/Dec-2009/msg00014.html
Tor is not vulnerable
On 12/29/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
It is fixed in Tor's stable release already:
http://archives.seul.org/tor/announce/Dec-2009/msg0.html
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well. Same
problem. I
On 12/20/09, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
Google are clearly clever enough to know that upsetting the 'tin-foiled'
geeks, by 'spying' on them would be enough to disrupt its browser.
Especially given its lowly market share, just a little bad press would
stop this thing ever taking
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their security?
Thanks.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
it's privacy and identity leakage concerns. It's designed by Google
with this built-in - they want to know everything about you and
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
So softraid can't detect if the data is written differently to the
drives? In what sort of cases would one expect the mirror to become
corrupt? Kernel crash? Hardware crash? Does softraid detect this? What
failures
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Daniel Gracia Garallar
danie...@electronicagracia.com wrote:
It is true, and AFAIK, todays it's a topper nice task... almost 20.
Regards,
Dani
Donald Allen escribis:
IMHO I hope OpenBSD doesn't use locks at all in the future taking
FreeBSD's lesson, but
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
So in what cases does softraid degrade the mirror then, other than
pulling the disk out?
When an I/O fails.
How is hardware mirror raid different?
It isn't.
Thanks.
Does this mean there's little advantage of
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Does this mean there's little advantage of hardware mirror raid over
software?
So software mirror raid increases chances of data corruption while
decreasing
the chances of downtime. True for hardware as well?
There are
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
probably a crappy card or disks.
3ware Escalade 8006-2LP :(. I know - not well supported because 3ware
are the M$ of RAID.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
Hi,
I am pretty sure this is not possible at all, but again, may be something
else is available that I haven't found/think yet.
Two questions I have.
1. use of dd across servers.
Hi. My 'softraid' mirror is not being detected and assembled at the
boot time. I must run 'bioctl' to assemble it after a reboot. This
started happening after I removed another softraid mirror from the box
(physically - the card and the drives). Do I have to rebuild from
scratch to make it detect
is to have all pieces in good shape. A dmesg might help because a
disk that wasn't auto assembled will complain (unless it was deleted).
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:14:53AM -0800, nixlists nixlists wrote:
Hi. My 'softraid' mirror is not being detected and assembled at the
boot time. I must run
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
jsing is working on a add auto assemble flag back button. For now you
are stuck with bioctl -c until that is done.
'softraid0 at root'
dmesg shows that softraid is not complaining at all, just the standard
'softraid0
Also if I am paranoid about mirror data being exactly the same on the
two halves (yes, I understand softraid should guarantee it, but
still...), how can I verify it? Or this functionality currently
nonexistent? Or am I asking a stupid question because softraid is
guaranteed to notice these things
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
So, what's heavy for you may be just simple routine for others and no, I do
not miss the fine lock either yet anyway. Would be nice, but really, I
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Soo... Your performance requirements may met by OpenBSD despite it's
current poor SMP support - other OSes will scale on SMP. Trade-offs,
trade-offs... It's a psychological issue. We have all this multicore
hardware
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
