Hi,
Ingo Schwarze wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:15:29PM +0200:
> justina colmena wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:54:45PM +:
>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 11:47:47 +0200 Marko Cupac wrote:
>>> I am sure OpenBSD will correct their errors in html/css code, if any,
>> Right now,
:04 PM (GMT-09:00) To:
misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Viewport for man.openbsd.org --
readability on phones
I don't understand what you are trying to say.
I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
Hi Justina,
justina colmena wrote on Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:54:45PM +:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 11:47:47 +0200
> Marko Cupać wrote:
>> I am sure OpenBSD will correct their errors in html/css code, if any,
> Right now, https://man.openbsd.org/relayd.conf.5 fails html
On Wed, 23 May 2018 11:47:47 +0200
Marko Cupać wrote:
> I am sure OpenBSD will correct their errors in html/css code, if any,
Right now, https://man.openbsd.org/relayd.conf.5 fails html validation.
On May 2018
Multiple list members wrote:
> I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
> the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
> layout is displayed on full display, not stretched.
> Text is fine, paragraphs are scaled ok, not even a simple
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 06:35:17AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> For younger UNIX users, the real reason is technical limits of hardware then.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punched_card#IBM_80-column_punched_card_format_and_character_codes
>
Fri, 18 May 2018 02:47:29 +0200 Ingo Schwarze
> Hi Aner,
>
> Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
> >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely not.
> >>> Mandoc output is not
Thank you Ingo, http://man.openbsd.org/ works great for
me too now.
--
I've found some more OpenBSD web pages that could benefit
from readable text on phone devices:
- httpd, all directory listings. sample:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.3/i386/
- cvsweb, all pages:
On 05/19/18 00:04, Mihai Popescu wrote:
I don't understand what you are trying to say.
I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
layout is displayed on full display, not stretched.
Text is fine,
On Saturday, May 19, 2018, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > I don't understand what you are trying to say.
>
> I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
> the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
> layout is displayed on full
ubject: Re: Viewport for
man.openbsd.org -- readability on phones
> I don't understand what you are trying to say.
I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
layout is displayed on full display, not
> I don't understand what you are trying to say.
I took and iPhone with iOS and Safari ( i think!) on it and pointed
the browser to the current link of man pages [1]. All i can say is the
layout is displayed on full display, not stretched.
Text is fine, paragraphs are scaled ok, not even a simple
Hi,
Mihai Popescu wrote on Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:50:24PM +0300:
> I have tested it on someone's Safari/iOS for iPhone, out of curiosity.
> It takes the full screen. Looking at the font in the posted
> screenshots i think it is Android in question.
I don't understand what you are trying to
On Fri, 18 May 2018 23:50:24 +0300
Mihai Popescu wrote:
> I have tested it on someone's Safari/iOS for iPhone, out of curiosity.
> It takes the full screen. Looking at the font in the posted
> screenshots i think it is Android in question.
>
> If it is not a secret, what runs
>
>
> If it is not a secret, what runs behind man.openbsd.org? Like httpd, CGI?
>
According to response headers:
"Server: OpenBSD httpd".
And with httpd(8) it must be FastCGI implemented either by perl script
directly or
with aid of slowcgi(8)
I have tested it on someone's Safari/iOS for iPhone, out of curiosity.
It takes the full screen. Looking at the font in the posted
screenshots i think it is Android in question.
If it is not a secret, what runs behind man.openbsd.org? Like httpd, CGI?
Thanks.
Hi Lars,
Lars Nooden wrote on Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:37:26PM +0300:
> 2) Regarding CSS, keeping the viewport settings in the CSS would
> allow the presentation and structure to remain more separate.
Exactly what i said in my last mail, it doesn't belong into the HTML.
> So something
1) For experimentation with CSS, many browsers have a web tool box
that can be opened with ctrl-shift-i or similar shortcut and can
change the CSS on-the-fly manually. That is a quick way test CSS
rules such as the viewport [1] rule being discussed. This seems to be
the CSS equivalent of the
Marc Espie wrote on Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:28:31AM +0200:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200:
>>> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
>>> usability on my phone when I add it to
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:47:29AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Aner,
>
> Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
> >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely not.
> >>> Mandoc output is not optimized for
schwa...@usta.de (Ingo Schwarze), 2018.05.18 (Fri) 02:47 (CEST):
> Hi Aner,
>
> Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
> >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely not.
> >>> Mandoc output is not optimized
On May 18, 2018 4:09:58 AM GMT+02:00, Ken M wrote:
>In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one
>because of
>bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean
>how big is
>the entire man page collection?
Well, bloat isn't only
On May 17 22:09:58, k...@mack-z.com wrote:
> In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because
> of
> bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big
> is
> the entire man page collection?
Wrong question.
$ ftp http://man.openbsd.org/du
$
In article <20180518004729.gl68...@athene.usta.de> Ingo Schwarze
wrote:
> Hi Aner,
>
> Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> > On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
> >> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely not.
> >>> Mandoc
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> > html { max-width: 100ex; }
> >
> > Removing this line allows the use of the full browser width.
> For testing purposes, i removed that line from
> https://man.openbsd.org/mandoc.css
>
> xcv@, could you check with your phone whether
On 05/18/2018 06:11 AM, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 18/05/18 12:09, Ken M wrote:
>> In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because
>> of
>> bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big
>> is
>> the entire man page collection?
>
>
If you REALLY want something like we had, without JS and non-standard
features, you can try something like:
@media screen and (min-width: 1000px) {
html { max-width: 100ex }
html { max-width: 80ch }
}
The @media queries is a long-standing feature and should just work.
The "ch" isn't supported by
On 18/05/18 12:09, Ken M wrote:
> In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because
> of
> bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big
> is
> the entire man page collection?
20kB may not sound like a lot, but consider, say, the `sh`
On Fri, 18 May 2018 02:47:29 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I must say i never particularly liked that line in the CSS file.
> It always felt like fiddling with details that it might be better
> not to touch, given that display devices running browsers differ
> more than terminal emulators. And
In all honesty I wasn't thinking of the suggestion as a cautious one because of
bloat. I think bootstrap minified and compressed is like 20k. I mean how big is
the entire man page collection?
I was more hesitant to make the suggestion because if there was ever a community
that en masse browsed
Hi Ken,
Ken M wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:50:53PM -0400:
> I will probably have to duck and run
> for suggesting javascript as the answer here...
Precisely. :)
> But for the most part the modern industry standard to make pages
> scale well across many devices and screen orientations is
I will probably have to duck and run for suggesting javascript as the answer
here...
But for the most part the modern industry standard to make pages scale well
across many devices and screen orientations is to use a responsive design
library, most notably bootstrap.
Ken
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at
Hi Aner,
Aner Perez wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM -0400:
> On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
>> "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
>>> Absolutely not.
>>> Mandoc output is not optimized for any device.
>>>
>>> Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code
>>>
On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:32:44 -0400
Aner Perez wrote:
> First non-comment line of mandoc.css says:
>
> html {max-width: 100ex; }
>
> Removing this line allows the use of the full browser width. I'm
> sure that it was put there for a reason (maybe to approximate
On 05/17/2018 05:22 PM, x...@dr.com wrote:
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
Absolutely not.
Mandoc output is not optimized for any device.
Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code
make you think it is optimized or it discriminates against
any device?
I don't know
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> Absolutely not.
> Mandoc output is not optimized for any device.
>
> Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code
> make you think it is optimized or it discriminates against
> any device?
I don't know which element or rule is the problem,
Hi Marc,
Marc Espie wrote on Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:28:31AM +0200:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200:
>>> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
>>> usability on my phone when I
Hi,
x...@dr.com wrote on Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:04:12PM +0200:
> I think it boils down to the site being optimized
> for common PC screen sizes,
Absolutely not.
Mandoc output is not optimized for any device.
Which elements or rules in the current HTML or CSS code
make you think it is
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> I'm absolutely uninterested in test results.
I understand that many times the designer of a web site may
have different priorities than I do.
Nevertheless, when a site performs poorly I can only:
- close the tab and open another site
- try to persuade
On 00:26 Wed 16 May, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> See no offence here, I wonder what is the context leading to read man
> pages on a phone?
Because OpenBSD distributes it's documentation in man pages. There is
no standalone documentation site.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200:
>
> > The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> > usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
> >
> > [meta
Hi Solene,
Solene Rapenne wrote on Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:26:10AM +0200:
> x...@dr.com writes:
>> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
>> usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
> See no offence here, I wonder what is the context leading
Also great for when you need reading material in the restroom.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:26:10AM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> >
> > x...@dr.com writes:
> >
> > > The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:26:10AM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
>
> x...@dr.com writes:
>
> > The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> > usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
>
> See no offence here, I wonder what is the context leading to
x...@dr.com writes:
> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
See no offence here, I wonder what is the context leading to read man
pages on a phone?
"Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> But you fail to state what the actual problem is that you are
> trying to solve.
The pages at http://man.openbsd.org/ don't use the screen real
estate of my phone in a sensible way. All pages are "zoomed out"
by default, causing a frustrating user
On 2018-05-15 22.51.43 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200:
> > [meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"]
>
> It is not defined in any standard.
I have no objection to the rest of your email -- in fact, I agree
Hi,
x...@dr.com wrote on Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:45PM +0200:
> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
>
> [meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"]
There is no way i
Tue, 15 May 2018 20:46:44 +0200 x...@dr.com
> > Tue, 15 May 2018 19:47:45 +0200 x...@dr.com
> > > The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> > > usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
> >
> > Hi anonymous,
> >
> > Could you please add it
> Tue, 15 May 2018 19:47:45 +0200 x...@dr.com
> > The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> > usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
>
> Hi anonymous,
>
> Could you please add it on some public space so I can check in Dillo too?
>
> Kind
Tue, 15 May 2018 19:47:45 +0200 x...@dr.com
> The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
> usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
Hi anonymous,
Could you please add it on some public space so I can check in Dillo too?
Kind regards,
Anton
The "viewport" meta tag significantly improves readability and
usability on my phone when I add it to http://man.openbsd.org pages:
[meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"]
It was suggested to me by a Microsoft Edge engineer as a fix for
mobile-unfriendly web
52 matches
Mail list logo