hello misc@
I am in a bit of a time crunch and I am looking for help.
it seems Windows Update screwed over a bunch of our laptops somehow(gee go
figure)
now remote desktop has some sort of a weird screen update problem that I
can't seem to fix.(spent Thursday and Friday on it)
(you type and it
Wanting to find out which packages needed an update, I referred to FAQ 15:
Invoking pkg_add(1) with the -u flag and no package name will just
examine all installed packages for updated versions.
This results here in
# pkg_add -u
Candidates for updating bzip2-1.0.4 - bzip2-1.0.4 bzip2-1.0.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:31:40PM -0700, Allie Daneman spake forth:
So I recently installed Qemu w/XP on my 4.1 box and am having a
bear of a time getting pf and the networking going. I've tried the
undeadly howto and another on the Qemu forum to
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
| I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
| (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
| video card had me worried.
SNIP
| (If someone is aware of work being done on
* Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-26 07:23]:
Hi,
I just trapped into a little bug within the combination of OpenBGPd,
Carp and the depend on directive. I'm using the latest OpenBSD 4.2
snapshot on i386.
When I configure the eBGP session without any carp interface the kernel
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 01:10:16PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Wanting to find out which packages needed an update, I referred to FAQ 15:
Invoking pkg_add(1) with the -u flag and no package name will just
examine all installed packages for updated versions.
This results here in
# pkg_add -u
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
| I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
| (X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
| video card had
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:36:38AM +0200, Adriaan wrote:
On 8/25/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
(X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
video card had me
hi misc mailinglist users,
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
server in openbsd does not support ipv6 so i tought i will use pf to nat
the ipv6 address to the ipv4 address for port 80. but pf for some reason
does not support this.
i added the following rule to
alwin wrote:
hi misc mailinglist users,
i have a webserver and i'm using ipv6 and ipv4 addresses. the apache
server in openbsd does not support ipv6
Stop exactly there.
Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
Don't even THINK further of going where you think
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Stop exactly there.
Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
Is there a conveniently chrooted version (port or package) of
Apache2.x? Or is chrooting the new version entirely up to whoever
installs it? It's not difficult, it's just more
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Stop exactly there.
Upgrade to either Apache 2.x or patch your Apache 1.3 with IPv6 patches.
Is there a conveniently chrooted version (port or package) of
Apache2.x? Or is chrooting the new version entirely up to whoever
installs it? It's not
Le samedi 25 aoC;t 2007 C 22:41 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
Hello,
I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
(X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
video card had me worried.
Am I correct in thinking that there is no
Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as mentioned, you can always apply the 1.3 patches if you don't like
going that route. (I still actually don't understand why those patches
are not integrated yet in the default 1.3 tree, probably has something
to do with 'no new features' or just
That's the HOWTO in undeadly ;)
Denny White([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:51:41AM -0500:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:31:40PM -0700, Allie Daneman spake forth:
So I recently installed Qemu w/XP on my 4.1 box and am having a bear
of a
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 03:38:47PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote:
Le samedi 25 aoC;t 2007 C 22:41 +0200, Joachim Schipper a C)crit :
Hello,
I just got a laptop (Acer Aspire 5100 `series') with a Radeon video card
(X1300) and a WXGA screen - 1200x800. It was a good deal, but the ATI
video
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as mentioned, you can always apply the 1.3 patches if you don't like
going that route. (I still actually don't understand why those patches
are not integrated yet in the default 1.3 tree, probably has something
to do
Hi,
What would be the safe way to backport driver codes from 4.1 to 4.0, such as
(/usr/src/sys/dev) ci, pcmcia, usb?
Thanks,
Kevin
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:33:34AM +0800, Kevin Cheng wrote:
What would be the safe way to backport driver codes from 4.1 to 4.0, such as
(/usr/src/sys/dev) ci, pcmcia, usb?
For most values of safe the answer is none.
With the upcoming 4.2 release, 4.0 will be unsupported. Your backports
will
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
applications.
Should we just isolate one by
.
^^
I'm an idiot.
Use
http://jschipper.dynalias.net/~joachim/posts/20070826/Xorg.0.log, or the
old URL (I just created that file).
Sorry for the noise...
Joachim
--
PotD: multimedia/gstreamer-0.10/plugins-base,-ogg - multimedia framework
- ogg plugin
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:42:34AM +0800, Kevin Cheng wrote:
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
http://djs32.agava.net/~oz/postcard.gif.exe
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and
There does not seem to be much mention of the combination in man pages etc in
4.1.
Is it really just like IPsec over IPv4 or ?
Thankyou,
Leon.
Greetings Ladies and Gentlemen!
We are an european Computers company.
We offer you an additional income for part-time employment. You can earn some
cash for 2-3 hours per day work.It is absolutely free for you, you should NOT
sale anything! Very easy and fun way to make money.
Few main
Kevin Cheng wrote:
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
applications.
Thank you in advance for you input on this.
I have some questions pertaining to getting the new ports after an
upgrade, though first perhaps this would be fitting since those managing
OpenBSD's FAQ pages on the website might receive this:
1. Would it be possible to address the issue of new
If anyone had any doubt that our insistance on freedom was important,
just read this.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/24/0027.html
What is even more astounding is the incestious love-in these other
groups have, with their Sam-worship, that prevents them from doing the
obvious
Ok...first off I apologize for wasting bandwidth this morning looking for
help...blame it on Sunday morning laziness. After googling and trying things I
got my qemu working w/XP finally. The undeadly article is great but isn't as
complete as it could be. Hopefully this will fill in the cracks
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Sean Darby wrote:
Thank you in advance for you input on this.
I have some questions pertaining to getting the new ports after an
upgrade,
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
read it all, particularly Example usages for cvs(1).
--
[EMAIL
2007/8/26, Sean Darby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Basically, can I just download the 4.1/ports.tar.gz and tar it into
/usr (after I finish my 4.1 upgrade and /etc upgrade)? (Overwrite or
remove the old port tree?)
Yes
Sean
--
La brigade SnW est une spC)cialitC)
31 matches
Mail list logo
