Maybe so. It was intended as an extremely absurd example...
Jeremy D. Young
On 06/18/2010 07:48 PM, CathyM wrote:
Jeremy said
If two individuals choose to resolve their disputes by chopping off the heads
of
chickens (assuming they own the chickens :P) and letting them run around on
] On Behalf Of Eric Vought
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:02 PM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Oklahoma Calls Ban on Islamic Law a 'Preemptive
Strike'
On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:15 AM, Jerry Blevins wrote:
Are you nuts!!
Perhaps, but I am also quite serious. Do
, 6/18/10, Jerry Blevins jb...@mchsi.com wrote:
From: Jerry Blevins jb...@mchsi.com
Subject: RE: [MoLiCo] Oklahoma Calls Ban on Islamic Law a 'Preemptive Strike'
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 5:58 AM
Well Eric I think you need to go back
[mailto:missourilibertycoalit...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric
Vought
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:02 PM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Oklahoma Calls Ban on Islamic Law a 'Preemptive
Strike'
On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:15 AM, Jerry Blevins wrote:
Are you nuts
Calls Ban on Islamic Law a 'Preemptive
Strike'
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Fred B. Ellison wrote (quoting ABC news):
[snip]
Oklahoma Law May Not Be Constitutional
Legal experts contacted by ABC News said they did not know of one
instance of a judge in the U.S. invoking sharia in rendering
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:23 PM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Oklahoma Calls Ban on Islamic Law a 'Preemptive
Strike'
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Fred B. Ellison wrote (quoting ABC
news):
[snip]
Oklahoma Law May Not Be Constitutional
Legal
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Fred B. Ellison wrote (quoting ABC news):
[snip]
Oklahoma Law May Not Be Constitutional
Legal experts contacted by ABC News said they did not know of one
instance of a judge in the U.S. invoking sharia in rendering a
decision.
Cases of first impression are
