Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-05 Thread WanMil
I have found that some multipolygons use nested inner polygons. Example: * A forest (outer) with a lake (inner) that has an island (inner) which is not a forest. (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/331402) By definition of the multipolygon relation

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-03 Thread Torsten Leistikow
Jeffrey Ollie schrieb am 02.03.2010 21:07: I've listened to that argument for a while and I'm tired of it. And I have tried to fight this anarchy and I got tired of it. So I accepted it as a fact and became much more relaxed and satisfied with OSM :-) Gruss Torsten

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-02 Thread WanMil
WanMil schrieb: I have found that some multipolygons use nested inner polygons. Example: * A forest (outer) with a lake (inner) that has an island (inner) which is not a forest. (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/331402) But neither mapnik nor osmarender show the

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-02 Thread Torsten Leistikow
WanMil schrieb am 02.03.2010 18:48: The patch supports the complete multipolygon specification. And additionally it is tolerant towards incorrect (but reasonable) multipolygons. So why should mkgmap be restrictive if it doesn't need to? Since there is not really a specification for the OSM

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-02 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de wrote: WanMil schrieb am 02.03.2010 18:48: The patch supports the complete multipolygon specification. And additionally it is tolerant towards incorrect (but reasonable) multipolygons. So why should mkgmap be restrictive if it

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-02 Thread WanMil
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Torsten Leistikowde_m...@gmx.de wrote: WanMil schrieb am 02.03.2010 18:48: The patch supports the complete multipolygon specification. And additionally it is tolerant towards incorrect (but reasonable) multipolygons. So why should mkgmap be restrictive if it

[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-01 Thread WanMil
I have found that some multipolygons use nested inner polygons. Example: * A forest (outer) with a lake (inner) that has an island (inner) which is not a forest. (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/331402) By definition of the multipolygon relation

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v1] Multipolygon: Allow nested inner polygons

2010-03-01 Thread Chris-Hein Lunkhusen
WanMil schrieb: I have found that some multipolygons use nested inner polygons. Example: * A forest (outer) with a lake (inner) that has an island (inner) which is not a forest. (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/331402) But neither mapnik nor osmarender show the