Hi :)
It's a bit difficult to prove or disprove without having even just a trial
period.
I'd not heard about the Firebird issue. Could i pass that around to a few
other people that are working on different aspects of Base, such as those in
documentation, the users list and such or is it
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:29 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
It's a bit difficult to prove or disprove without having even just a trial
period.
Sure we have to make a decision based on our experience. Then again,
having a clear, focused purpose and audience to the list would be good;
Hi Florian,
On 05/09/2013 02:26 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Donald,
Donald Norwood wrote on 2013-05-09 03:40:
Are we only receiving moderation requests for the mirrors mailing list
or all the the mailing lists? My confusion comes from the initial email
with the fill mail listing.
it's
Hey Florian Marc and everyone. I was just thinking seeing as we have a
moderators mailing list now for the mailing lists, could the moderators
email address be extended to use with the forums when that time comes?
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Tom
The forums are still in development stages, sadly that stopped so I am not
sure what the deal is there. Marc Pare would be the guy to talk to if you
want to help out there.
Florian i agree with Tom this should be a central list for all projects
that need moderation. Does the wiki and other
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier wrote on 2013-05-09 15:10:
I was adapting my moderation folder and realized that I might be the
only one moderating the Nabble gateway now that Drew is away for a
while, or is there anybody else with me? this is not a charge, there is
very few to do, but more for the
Hi :)
I would be quite happy to be a moderator on Nabble too. At the moment it feels
weird not being able to help there as i still see the normal emails and Nabble
as being the same thing. It's confusing me.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Sophie Gautier
florian any chance you can black list this domain as this is the 3rd email
today from the same company in the span of a few hrs to the mirrors list i
have rejected them all but still its very annoying that they are still
pushing to spam the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Would it be worth sending out an email to those moderators of other parts
of the project such as wiki etc to sign up here?
Maybe as well making a global announcement that if anyone finds spam on
mailing lists etc for example can contact moderators here.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Florian
On 09/05/2013 15:11, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier wrote on 2013-05-09 15:10:
I was adapting my moderation folder and realized that I might be the
only one moderating the Nabble gateway now that Drew is away for a
while, or is there anybody else with me? this is not a
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-05-09 15:20:
florian any chance you can black list this domain as this is the 3rd email
today from the same company in the span of a few hrs to the mirrors list i
have rejected them all but still its very annoying that they are still
pushing to spam
Hi :)
I get the impression that if we do nothing then the message gets blocked. So
if you don't like a message or think it's spam then it's fine to leave it.
We are mainly trying to catch the ones that should not have been blocked in
order to unblock them.
Regard from
Tom :)
On 09/05/2013 15:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Isnt that the same thing as emailing back saying reject?
yes, it's said on the mail that passed a 10 (?) days delay, the mail
will be automagically destroyed :)
Kind regards
Sophie
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
I am sorry for this spam. My fingers were too fast and sent an empty
reply to a wrong mail.
Best Regards,
Petr
Petr Mladek píše v Čt 09. 05. 2013 v 15:43 +0200:
Florian Effenberger píše v Čt 09. 05. 2013 v 14:57 +0200:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-05-09 14:56:
Hey Florian Marc
There's a problem with replying to a spammer; in that way you're
merely acknowledging that the e-address is valid.
To my way of thinking, that's a bad thing to do; isn't it better to
ignore hope the spammer will give up.
Also, these spammers tend to use slightly different
as in Mission Impossible ;-)
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.comwrote:
On 09/05/2013 15:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Isnt that the same thing as emailing back saying reject?
yes, it's said on the mail that passed a 10 (?) days delay, the mail
this isnt replying to the spammer this is replying to the server telling it
to reject the message.
thanks to google this saved this address automatically
this is what i am replying to discuss+reject-2521220c3d6c2f84
discuss+reject-2521220c3d6c2...@documentfoundation.org which tells mlmmj
to
Hi :)
All true
However if something reaches this list it has already been rejected. We just
try to rescue the ones that were valid and sent here by mistake.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com
To: anne-ology
Totally agreed I think what anne-ology was concerned we would be sending an
email back to the spammer saying this is a valid email keep on spamming me.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
All true
However if something reaches this list it has
Hi Jean-Baptiste, *,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
Le 09/05/2013 16:49, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 09/05/2013 15:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Isnt that
that is a very valid question.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org
wrote:
Hi,
Le 09/05/2013 16:49, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi *,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sophie Gautier gautier.sop...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 09/05/2013 15:52, Jonathan
Jean-Baptiste rejecting the email gets it off the server so to speak
otherwise just ignoring it it sits there for 10 days before being rejected.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste, *,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina píše v Čt 09. 05. 2013 v 17:58 +0200:
that is a very valid question.
I appreciate your energy you spend here, but can you please decrease the
amount of mail you write to tdf-moderators@? A
What's the matter with Jonathan's method?
And Top-posting is the most logical method;
otherwise you have to re-read what you've already read in order
to see the new bit.
[are bottom-posters so forgetful???]
HOW can you condemn Jonathan's behaviour
Hi :)
Anne, what the bottom posters want is to make it awkward for people. They
don't want you to just reply to the message. You have to edit out the bits
that in your opinion are not relevant anymore so that their message becomes
your interpretation of what they might have been trying to
Tom,
Tom Davies wrote on 2013-05-09 20:26:
Notice that the Netiquette guide is from several decades ago, it's
pre-hand-helds, pre-tablets, even pre-mobile-phones. It's deeply routed in
ancient technology and old ways of doing things from an era that has long since
gone.
this Netiquette is
I agree.
And I will continue to be logical, using common sense.
And I will continue to defend those who are unfairly attacked; even
if it means being attacked myself.
I've always followed this advice; I see no reason to cease now,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:26 PM,
Hi,
Am 09.05.2013 21:19, schrieb anne-ology:
I agree.
What do you agree to?
Stefan
--
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: moderators+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Hi Anne, Tom,
On 09/05/2013 21:19, anne-ology wrote:
I agree.
And I will continue to be logical, using common sense.
And I will continue to defend those who are unfairly attacked; even
if it means being attacked myself.
I've always followed this advice; I see
29 matches
Mail list logo
