[ANNOUNCE] Apache::Singleton 0.02 (Re: Tips tricks needed :))

2001-12-22 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:51:30 -0500 Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like this? (using register_cleanup instead of pnotes) Better to use pnotes. I started out doing this kind of thing with register_cleanup and had problems like random segfaults. I think it was because other

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::Singleton 0.03

2001-12-22 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:04:11 +0900 Tatsuhiko Miyagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now it uses pnotes(). Todo is to add scope configuration for each classes. Added subclasses with own object lifetime configuration. I myself am just a little dubious about its implementation, especially for Server

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Singleton 0.03

2001-12-22 Thread brian moseley
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote: Note that multiple process cannot share blessed reference without serialization, so *One instance for one server* is just an idea. What it means is, one instance for one process, and multiple instances with shared

transient object data

2001-12-22 Thread brian moseley
doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by Storable, etc? i've solved this problem in the past by writing a class-specific serialization method that undefs things i don't want serialized. but it seems like something that

Re: transient object data

2001-12-22 Thread DeWitt Clinton
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:11:33AM -0800, brian moseley wrote: doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by Storable, etc? I'd love that as well. For example, when persisting Cache::Object instances I manually strip out

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Singleton 0.03

2001-12-22 Thread DeWitt Clinton
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:39:03PM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote: One instance for one server (across all httpd processes). Implemented using Cache::SharedMemoryCache (IPC). Maybe you want to consider directly using Cache::SharedMemoryBackend instead of the SharedMemoryCache class. The

irc

2001-12-22 Thread brian moseley
i can't believe i never thought to ask this in 4 years, but: do any of you hang out on irc anywhere in particular? shouldn't there be a #mod_perl somewhere, if there isn't already?

Re: What phase am I in?

2001-12-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Dave Rolsky wrote: On 21 Dec 2001, Vivek Khera wrote: DR == Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's called current_callback(). DR Grr, its not documented when I do 'perldoc Apache'. There's a lot of stuff not so documented. The mod_perl book has much more complete docs. Which is

Re: Can't locate object method dir_config via package Apache::RegistryFilter

2001-12-22 Thread Randy Kobes
- Original Message - Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:32:24 +0100 From: Gerald Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can't locate object method dir_config via package Apache::RegistryFilter I have a problem with Apache::RegistryFilter. I can't get it to work. If I

Re: irc

2001-12-22 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Thomas Eibner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 07:21:00AM -0800, brian moseley wrote: i can't believe i never thought to ask this in 4 years, but: do any of you hang out on irc anywhere in particular? shouldn't there be a #mod_perl somewhere, if there isn't already?

Re: irc

2001-12-22 Thread Thomas Eibner
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Cure wrote: On irc.dal.net, theres a #mod_perl, Nobody goes there anyomore, But we all could start joining it. Please, no more networks =) I think something like #modperl would be appropriate on rhizomatic, but it's not up to me. -- Thomas Eibner

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::Singleton 0.03

2001-12-22 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 09:23:30 -0500 DeWitt Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One instance for one server (across all httpd processes). Implemented using Cache::SharedMemoryCache (IPC). Maybe you want to consider directly using Cache::SharedMemoryBackend instead of the SharedMemoryCache

Re: Can't locate object method dir_config via package Apache::RegistryFilter

2001-12-22 Thread Gerald Menzel
- Original Message - From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_Perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Can't locate object method dir_config via package Apache::RegistryFilter - Original Message - Date: Tue, 18

Re: Cache::Cache locking

2001-12-22 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:55:15 -0800 (PST) brian moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apache::Singleton::Server got me thinking about Cache::Cache and locking again. if i'm going to have a server-global object, i am going to need to protect against multiple processes updating it simultaneously,

Re: Can't locate object method dir_config via packageApache::RegistryFilter

2001-12-22 Thread Randy Kobes
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gerald Menzel wrote: - Original Message - From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_Perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Can't locate object method dir_config via package Apache::RegistryFilter

[OT] Re: multipart read error

2001-12-22 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Boex,Matthew W. wrote: CGI.pm: Server closed socket during multipart read (client aborted?) [snip] i get this error as soon as i hit my upload [snip] files that are between 10-40k are no problem. when i upload 100-400k, i get this Might be $CGI::POST_MAX Try

Re: irc

2001-12-22 Thread Issac Goldstand
Thomas Eibner wrote: On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 07:21:00AM -0800, brian moseley wrote: i can't believe i never thought to ask this in 4 years, but: do any of you hang out on irc anywhere in particular? shouldn't there be a #mod_perl somewhere, if there isn't already? We used to hang on #Take23

Re: transient object data

2001-12-22 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 10:19 PM 12/22/2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote: On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:11:33AM -0800, brian moseley wrote: doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by Storable, etc? I'd love that as well. For example, when

Re: transient object data

2001-12-22 Thread brian moseley
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, brian moseley wrote: doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by Storable, etc? dammit, i keep deleting peoples' replies before i am able to reply to them myself. gunther's suggestion was to use

Re: Cache::Cache locking

2001-12-22 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 10:55 PM 12/22/2001, brian moseley wrote: Apache::Singleton::Server got me thinking about Cache::Cache and locking again. if i'm going to have a server-global object, i am going to need to protect against multiple processes updating it simultaneously, right? we've already talked about this

Re: transient object data

2001-12-22 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 03:33 PM 12/23/2001, brian moseley wrote: On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, brian moseley wrote: doesn't it seem like there should be a way to denote object data as transient so that it doesn't get serialized by Storable, etc? dammit, i keep deleting peoples' replies before i am able to reply to

cvs commit: modperl-2.0/todo api.txt

2001-12-22 Thread stas
stas01/12/22 20:30:28 Modified:todo api.txt Log: - updates to the todo issue with send_fd. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +3 -1 modperl-2.0/todo/api.txt Index: api.txt === RCS file:

cvs commit: modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_perl_includes.h

2001-12-22 Thread dougm
dougm 01/12/22 21:46:29 Modified:src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_perl_includes.h Log: nasty workaround for bug fixed in bleedperl (11536 + 11553) in $foo = \*STDOUT; where the reference would get a copy of STDOUT without the tie magic. (recentish changes that re-tied