On Thu, Mar 04, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I wanted mod_ssl to use DER Base64 encoded certs by default, would it be
as simple as doing a `perl -pi -e 's/PEM/DER/g;'` to the mod_ssl source
files, and then adding '-outform DER' to makecrt.sh where appropriate?
(compile and install
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
I'm just preparing a test suite for upgrading our www servers to actual
versions (from Apache/1.3.1 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.10 ;) )
This week I was very busy with hacking on mod_ssl. The result is now
available: mod_ssl 2.2.4. Beside a lot of
Contrib? No, that's for user contributions. The official
distribution from me is under distrib, of course.
Yes, I'm a camel ;)
switching to OpenSSL 0.9.2 as the minimum required toolkit version we
It's proposed for March 15th, 1999.
Great. Currently I test with 0.9.1c (the
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
switching to OpenSSL 0.9.2 as the minimum required toolkit version we
It's proposed for March 15th, 1999.
Great. Currently I test with 0.9.1c (the compiler runs were all sucessful
under Linux), on monday I'll compile under Irix useing
hello,
I'm using Solaris 2.6 on Ultra1. I tried to compile the new
mod_ssl-2.2.4-1.3.4 and get the following error when running make:
cc -c -I/opt/apache/include -DSOLARIS2=260 -DMOD_SSL=202103 -DEAPI -KPIC
-DSHARED_MODULE -I/opt/openssl-0.9.1c/include -DMOD_SSL_VERSION=\"2.2.4\"
"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I wanted mod_ssl to use DER Base64 encoded certs by default, would it be
as simple as doing a `perl -pi -e 's/PEM/DER/g;'` to the mod_ssl source
files, and then adding '-outform DER' to
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I wanted mod_ssl to use DER Base64 encoded certs by default, would it be
as simple as doing a `perl -pi -e 's/PEM/DER/g;'` to the mod_ssl source
files, and then adding '-outform DER' to makecrt.sh where appropriate?
(compile and
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, Fathi Ben Nasr wrote:
What is the difference between SSLeay and openssl i.e. which one
should I use (with mod-ssl 2.2.3-1.3.4 and apache) and why ?
Although this should be asked on our openssl-users list, here is an answer:
The difference are first a lot of bugfixes
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Ok, sounds like a reasonable suggestion. But do you want DER+Base64 or just
plain DER? Because DER is a binary format while DER+Base64 is the binary plus
Base64 transformed and PEM is
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
This week I was very busy with hacking on mod_ssl. The result is now
available: mod_ssl 2.2.4. Beside a lot of small changes at all edges for
preparing the final transition from SSLeay to OpenSSL this version fixes at
I'am writing a CA SW based on
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, Mario Fabiano wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
This week I was very busy with hacking on mod_ssl. The result is now
available: mod_ssl 2.2.4. Beside a lot of small changes at all edges for
preparing the final transition from SSLeay to OpenSSL this version fixes
"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Ok, ok, when I understand you correctly, you want that mod_ssl can read any
combination Let's see what I can do.
Much appreciated! Though I don't think every combination is required. At
least not by us. DER Base64 encoding of
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Ralf S. Engelschall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Ok, ok, when I understand you correctly, you want that mod_ssl can read any
combination Let's see what I can do.
Much appreciated! Though I don't think every combination is
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999, Alfredo Raul Pena wrote:
I'm sorry about the insistence, but what do anyone thinks about this?
Regards, Alfredo
Since mod_ssl 2.1 you can get _all_ ingredients of a certificate via
environment variables SSL_. What ingredients are you missing?
I think the
14 matches
Mail list logo
