FW: Memory leak - Apache2.0.47 and openSSL 0.9.7c

2003-12-19 Thread John Hughes
I've been performing some stress tests on the following environment: - Redhat 8.0 - Apache web server 2.0.47 - openSSL 0.9.7c the tests have involved accessing simple web pages many times using an automated load generator. Whilst memory utilization without mod_ssl load was seen to be flat

Re: FW: Memory leak - Apache2.0.47 and openSSL 0.9.7c

2003-12-19 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:19:15AM -, John Hughes wrote: Please let me know if you would like any other information. I do have output from the load generator and the utility that I can send anyone. What type of SSLSessionCache are you using? Do you any any 3rd party modules? Please also

RE: FW: Memory leak - Apache2.0.47 and openSSL 0.9.7c

2003-12-19 Thread John Hughes
I have no 3rd party modules loaded. The testing I did was with and without mod_ssl loaded. Only when mod_ssl was loaded - and SSL was used - did I see a memory leak under load. My SSLSessionCache values are the default and are: SSLSessionCache dbm:logs/ssl_scache SSLSessionCacheTimeout

Re: FW: Memory leak - Apache2.0.47 and openSSL 0.9.7c

2003-12-19 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:01:57AM -, John Hughes wrote: I have no 3rd party modules loaded. The testing I did was with and without mod_ssl loaded. Only when mod_ssl was loaded - and SSL was used - did I see a memory leak under load. My SSLSessionCache values are the default and are:

Re: Replacing an SSL certificate

2003-12-19 Thread Huw Jenkins
I rebooted the unit eventually, which I guess had the same effect. However I will remember that in future. Many thanks. Huw Jenkins From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:16:44 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Replacing an

SSL_R_DIGEST_CHECK_FAILED

2003-12-19 Thread Ken Snider
We have a 0.9.6-based client talking to a 0.9.7a-based mod_ssl server. Communication is fine for initial session negotiation, and for SSL session resumption while the key remains in the cache. However, if the key has expired and we try to pass a new SSL Session ID to the client, the client

Suggest SSLSessionCacheTimeout and Cache sizes?

2003-12-19 Thread Ken Snider
Does anyone have any information on shmcb cache sizings? Specifically, how many bytes per request are taken up in shm for each cache entry? I'd like to make sure my shm size is sufficient for the Cache Timeouts I want to use. Secondly, is there any reason why the SSLSessionCacheTimeout can't be

Re: Suggest SSLSessionCacheTimeout and Cache sizes?

2003-12-19 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi Ken, On December 19, 2003 03:54 pm, Ken Snider wrote: Does anyone have any information on shmcb cache sizings? Specifically, how many bytes per request are taken up in shm for each cache entry? I'd like to make sure my shm size is sufficient for the Cache Timeouts I want to use. The