Re: New fields for META.yml

2007-10-30 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
A. Pagaltzis schreef: * Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-29 17:45]: I think it'd be a good idea if META.yml had fields that say where the bug queue is, and where the source code lives. That way search.cpan.org, and any others, could refer to the proper URLs ??? The META.yml

Re: distributed/centralized META.yml data

2007-10-30 Thread Andy Lester
The trouble with ad-hoc is just that it tends to *never* get formalized (i.e. never gets centrally documented, becomes discoverable, appears in books, etc.) The trouble with planned soluttions is that it tends to *never* get implemented. Lots of talking, lots of ideas, precious little

Re: distributed/centralized META.yml data

2007-10-30 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: module-authors@perl.org Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:39:01 PM Subject: Re: distributed/centralized META.yml data The trouble with ad-hoc is just that it tends to *never* get

Re: distributed/centralized META.yml data

2007-10-30 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Ovid wrote: Frankly, I'd suggest waiting a while before pulling the trigger and then if nothing manifests (which I'm guessing it won't), then go ahead. The risk is infinitesimal. I put some fields in a META.yml, and ask Graham to see if he can support

Re: distributed/centralized META.yml data

2007-10-30 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Andy Lester # on Tuesday 30 October 2007 07:39: The trouble with ad-hoc is just that it tends to *never* get formalized (i.e. never gets centrally documented, becomes discoverable, appears in books, etc.) The trouble with planned soluttions is that it tends to *never* get implemented.