Fergal Daly wrote:
Changing the subject from Keenan to Freeman (James Keenan is not MIA),
Yes, the reports of my demise are quite premature.
Ironically, today we had the first meeting of Perl Seminar NY's Phalanx
Phoenix project (http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=586406),
whose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12 Jan 2007, at 10:16, David Landgren wrote:
Do we wait until someone else manifests a need to dust off one of
them to hand over maintenance? Or do we forget about it until next
time? If it's worth it, then I would volunteer.
Actually I was
On 12 Jan 2007, at 10:56, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
For the record, James Keenan is an active developer
(http://search.cpan.org/~jkeenan/). The modules in question were found
in James Freeman's directory (http://search.cpan.org/~jfreeman/).
Did anyone mention James Keenan?
--
Andy Armstrong,
On 12 Jan 2007, at 10:58, Fergal Daly wrote:
Changing the subject from Keenan to Freeman (James Keenan is not MIA),
Ah - I didn't even read the subject :)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
Changing the subject from Keenan to Freeman (James Keenan is not MIA),
F
On 12/01/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12 Jan 2007, at 10:16, David Landgren wrote:
Do we wait until someone else manifests a need to dust off one of
them
On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote:
I was also wondering whether - given that backpan exists so people
can always find them if they really want them - there shouldn't be
a mechanism for removing modules that are unloved and unused.
How in the world could you determine
On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote:
Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers
go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager
volunteer (and only one!), it's the perfect storm.
I think the term 'deadbeat developer' might be a little harsh for
On 10 Jan 2007, at 11:27, Ovid wrote:
Yes, that was the one I meant. It seemed like a major obstacle for
this module.
Well that works on an out of the box MP2 installation on my laptop
here now. MP1 still works too fortunately :)
If it's still supposed to be a drop in replacement for
--- Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote:
Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers
go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager
volunteer (and only one!), it's the perfect storm.
I think the
Andy Armstrong did write:
Once Ask or whoever gives me permissions the new release will appear in
the index. For now it can be found here:
http://cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/A/AN/ANDYA/CGI-Simple-0.078.tar.gz
Ping brian d foy, but I imagine he's already watching this thread.
DAvid
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:32, David Landgren wrote:
Andy Armstrong did write:
Once Ask or whoever gives me permissions the new release will
appear in the index. For now it can be found here:
http://cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/A/AN/ANDYA/CGI-
Simple-0.078.tar.gz
Ping brian d foy, but I
On Jan 10, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Ovid wrote:
--- Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote:
Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers
go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager
volunteer (and only one!), it's
On 9 Jan 2007, at 10:13, Ovid wrote:
I'm not particularly keen on taking over this distribution, but he's
not fixing this bug or even responding. He also notes that Perl is a
fond corner of [his] past, suggesting that unless someone snags
CGI::Simple, this very popular (and useful!) module will
On 9 Jan 2007, at 10:13, Ovid wrote:
Has anyone heard from James Freeman, the maintainer of CGI::Simple
(http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cgi-Simple/)? It's not been updated in a
couple of years, the outstanding bugs appear to mostly be related to
the same issue, and I tried emailing him about this
14 matches
Mail list logo
