Re: Help on module name (working name 'Regexp::Query' - UPDATE: now 'Grep::Query')

2016-07-29 Thread kenneth
In case anyone is interested a working module is now available at https://github.com/kenneth-olwing/grep-query.git, also see an entry for it on PrePAN. ken1 On 2016-07-26 10:39, kenn...@olwing.se wrote: Hi David, Many thanks for taking the time! ... So, first of all, please do not take

Re: Help on module name (working name 'Regexp::Query' - UPDATE: now 'Grep::Query')

2016-07-26 Thread kenneth
Hi David, Many thanks for taking the time! ... So, first of all, please do not take Scrooge. I am rather fond of that name, and plan to publish my module with that name some day. Noted :-) ! As to your idea, it looks like you're working with something like grep. The key difference is that

Re: Help on module name (working name 'Regexp::Query')

2016-07-25 Thread David Mertens
Hello Kenneth, My background: I have been working on a generic greedy pattern matching engine for my years. It is called Scrooge. The original itch was to be able to write "regexes" for numerical data (i.e. PDL). It took a long time before that idea grew into an implementation (starting around

Help on module name (working name 'Regexp::Query')

2016-07-25 Thread kenneth
Hello all, I'd like to request some advice/thoughs/help on selecting a name for a module. The working name is 'Regexp::Query', but as it happens the realization of the original idea has moved slightly ahead of that so I'm no longer confident on the suitability... The Scratched Itch: I have

help with module name, module of abstracted regex via data objects.

2007-12-05 Thread benh
Currently I've been running with this named as String::Clean but I think that it could be more descriptive. The end goal is to have a collection of things that you would need to be replaced or striped from a string. This all started because each of the developers at work had seperate lists of

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-28 Thread Jerome Quelin
On 07/05/27 21:27 +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: well, i don't like the way to prereq sthg in pococm that i won't really use - that is, the whole non-poe logic of audio::mpd. What whole non-POE logic? All the logic I can find is the as_string method. Are we talking about the same modules? i

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-28 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 08:47, Jerome Quelin écrivait: thus, the dist audio::mpd::items would not be enough - unless i also release separately audio::mpd::stats and... which is a bit silly imo. therefore: - audio::mpdhelper? - audio::mpdcommon? Maybe Audio::MPD::Common, so that

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-28 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 13:11, Jerome Quelin écrivait: On 07/05/28 12:31 +0200, Philippe 'Book' Bruhat wrote: thus, the dist audio::mpd::items would not be enough - unless i also release separately audio::mpd::stats and... which is a bit silly imo. therefore: - audio::mpdhelper?

help for module name?

2007-05-27 Thread Jerome Quelin
hi there, i'm working on a module to interface with music player daemon (mpd). i've released: - audio::mpd, a traditional oo interface - poe::component::client::mpd, a poe-aware interface they're both under development. for each of them, i've defined an item class to map the items manipulated

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-27 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jerome Quelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-27 09:50]: so here's my question: how should i name this new module? - audio::item= isn't it too vague? - audio::mpditem = isn't it too specific? (would it be used by others?) - other? The modules I see are just structs, and the only code in

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-27 Thread Jerome Quelin
On 07/05/27 17:31 +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Jerome Quelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-27 09:50]: so here's my question: how should i name this new module? - audio::item= isn't it too vague? - audio::mpditem = isn't it too specific? (would it be used by others?) - other? The

Re: help for module name?

2007-05-27 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jerome Quelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-27 18:05]: On 07/05/27 17:31 +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: I’d suggest Audio::MPD::Item as the distro name, since you’ve already organised them as a hierarchy in there. As a bonus you won’t even need to change any of the Audio::MPD code, just add