Re: IO::ALL (Was: check for errors on close())

2005-04-27 Thread Smylers
Sam Vilain writes: Smylers wrote: Sam (or any other IO::All users reading this), what's your experience of IO::All? How much effort has it saved you? Does it make your code look Hi Sam -- thanks for taking the time to answer. I've only just begun to reap the benefits of it. After

Re: Bootstrapping a module community

2005-04-27 Thread Adrian Howard
On 24 Apr 2005, at 15:48, John Siracusa wrote: What's the best way to spread the word about a new module? I've got a few modules that I think a lot of people would find useful. They're still in active development (pre-1.0) but I'd like as many people as possible to try them so I can get

Re: IO::ALL (Was: check for errors on close())

2005-04-27 Thread Sam Vilain
Smylers wrote: I've only just begun to reap the benefits of it. After how long of using it? Does that mean that initially you found it more hassle? No, not at all. I've just only found myself using it twice so far. However, when I did I found it deliciously DWIMmy and extremely handy. eg, in