Re: MetaCPAN is quickly becoming the de-facto interface to CPAN

2011-08-30 Thread sawyer x
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Arthur Corliss corl...@digitalmages.comwrote: I think you're still missing my point and focusing on defending a company you obviously like. All you had to do was originally write as much as I understand people's desire for encryption, I still believe that 1.

Re: MetaCPAN is quickly becoming the de-facto interface to CPAN

2011-08-30 Thread Arthur Corliss
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, sawyer x wrote: All you had to do was originally write as much as I understand people's desire for encryption, I still believe that 1. SSL is only necessary in specific websites (example A, example B) and 2. when working with Google we shouldn't be worrying about encryption

Re: Module::Build::Tiny

2011-08-30 Thread Leon Timmermans
If you're using Dist::Zilla, you *should* not need anything besides META.json to install a simple module if you just set dynamic_config=0. (This should is, of course, largely unimplemented.) I hope a lot of Module::Built::Tiny will end up getting reused for that purpose. Overall, it looks

Re: MetaCPAN is quickly becoming the de-facto interface to CPAN

2011-08-30 Thread David Cantrell
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:33:54PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote: I didn't think it was a question of CPU speed anytime in the past decade. It is on small mobile clients, and the notwork latency it adds is also noticeable. And on the server side, when you're running on old donated equipment, or