Dave Rolsky writes:
I'm still trying to decide between sticking with WWW::Map or switching
to WWW::MapService.
How about WebService::Map?
Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that
there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help
implement
khemir nadim wrote:
I started a vonlontary review on Perl Monks. I don't know if it's the best
place but since they have reviews I thought it would be a good place to
start with (and I couldn't think of a better place). It hasn't given any
result so far :-) . If some of you would be nice
* Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-10 01:02]:
Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with
WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given
the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not
generating HTML or anything like
What about WWW::Service::Map???
That would seem to fit.
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
This'd be great _except_ that www.maplink.com is the website for a
map/travel book company. Too
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Smylers wrote:
How about WebService::Map?
Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that
there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help
implement generic webby things (in WWW::) from those which are an
interface to a
On Jul 9, 2004, at 8:46 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
WWW::MapLinker?
That implies that it's a module that performs an action (linking), as
opposed to a module that is something (a link).
WWW::MapLink, then.
David
khemir nadim wrote:
Hi,
I started a vonlontary review on Perl Monks. I don't know if it's the best
place but since they have reviews I thought it would be a good place to
start with (and I couldn't think of a better place). It hasn't given any
result so far :-) . If some of you would be nice
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote:
Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with
WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given
the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not
generating HTML or
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 08:46:31AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Smylers wrote:
How about WebService::Map?
Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that
there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help
implement
