Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote: Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager volunteer (and only one!), it's the perfect storm. I think the term 'deadbeat developer' might be a little harsh for

Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 10 Jan 2007, at 11:27, Ovid wrote: Yes, that was the one I meant. It seemed like a major obstacle for this module. Well that works on an out of the box MP2 installation on my laptop here now. MP1 still works too fortunately :) If it's still supposed to be a drop in replacement for

Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread Ovid
--- Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote: Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager volunteer (and only one!), it's the perfect storm. I think the

Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread David Landgren
Andy Armstrong did write: Once Ask or whoever gives me permissions the new release will appear in the index. For now it can be found here: http://cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/A/AN/ANDYA/CGI-Simple-0.078.tar.gz Ping brian d foy, but I imagine he's already watching this thread. DAvid

Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 10 Jan 2007, at 17:32, David Landgren wrote: Andy Armstrong did write: Once Ask or whoever gives me permissions the new release will appear in the index. For now it can be found here: http://cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/A/AN/ANDYA/CGI- Simple-0.078.tar.gz Ping brian d foy, but I

Re: CGI::Simple

2007-01-10 Thread Ken Williams
On Jan 10, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Ovid wrote: --- Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10 Jan 2007, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote: Wow, that's the smoothest I've ever seen one of these transfers go. A useful module, an obviously deadbeat developer, an eager volunteer (and only one!), it's