Mattia Barbon wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'd like to contact Joe Yates (JOEYATES) and Graciliano Monteiro
Passos (GMPASSOS), the former for OpenOffice::UNO module, the
gmpassos rang a bell.
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node=gmpassos
Hasn't been there in two years...
Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
I'd like to get App::Config indexed, but ABW has module-list registered
App::Config but does not use it. I've sent him an email with no reply (only
about a week ago). Does anyone have a lead on a better way to get in touch
with him than the address listed on his CPAN
On 9/6/07 4:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why do CPAN modules eschew the use of these and invent their
own mechanisms that are almost guaranteed to be less powerful?
I agree with all your listed reason, but I think you missed one: minimum
overhead. Ideally, logging would disappear
Source filters can be a solution. very little overhead. I wrote
Filter::Uncomment just for that.
On Friday 07 September 2007 03:58, John Siracusa wrote:
On 9/6/07 4:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why do CPAN modules eschew the use of these and invent their
own mechanisms that are almost
I like the concept of this, but I think to be successfull you need
buy-in from the various log package authors as well as more than a few
core module authors. The name Log::Any sounds as good as any (har
har) but in this case, I think naming is the least of your worries.
On 9/6/07, [EMAIL
David Landgren wrote:
Mattia Barbon wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'd like to contact Joe Yates (JOEYATES) and Graciliano Monteiro
Passos (GMPASSOS), the former for OpenOffice::UNO module, the
gmpassos rang a bell.
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node=gmpassos
what color this bell is?
Abstract has two meanings, so I think that could be confusing. I
think Log::Any is better.
On 9/7/07, Jonathan Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is very true. That is why I'd volunteer to patch the major
modules in a backwards-compatible way.
Incidentally, this is also being commented on
# from John Siracusa
# on Thursday 06 September 2007 06:58 pm:
On 9/6/07 4:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why do CPAN modules eschew the use of these and invent their
own mechanisms that are almost guaranteed to be less powerful?
I agree with all your listed reason, but I think you missed
* John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-07 13:15]:
Ideally, logging would disappear entirely from the code path
when disabled. Perl being Perl, this is rarely possible,
Will be easy in 5.10, coming Any Day Now.
FWIW…
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
A. Pagaltzis writes:
* John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-07 13:15]:
Ideally, logging would disappear entirely from the code path
when disabled. Perl being Perl, this is rarely possible,
Will be easy in 5.10
Is that still the case? The most recent development release has this in
10 matches
Mail list logo
