* Jonathan Rockway j...@jrock.us [2009-05-03 08:00]:
* On Sat, May 02 2009, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Yeah, if there are thousands of other programmers using a
module, then its name can be pretty much anything.
If more or less the only marketing it has is search.cpan.org
results page,
On May 3, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jonathan Rockway j...@jrock.us [2009-05-03 08:00]:
This is why Perl people should blog more.
Agreed, that helps up to a point. But you can’t natter on about
*every* module at the same level of noise.
I vehemently agree. At the risk
For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan testers
that I can't replicate. See this error report...
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/03/msg3560533.html
# Failed test 'pi with precision=6'
# at t/round.t line 18.
# got: 3.141593
#
On 3 May 2009, at 20:07, Bill Ward wrote:
For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan
testers that I can't replicate. See this error report...
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/03/msg3560533.html
# Failed test 'pi with precision=6'
# at
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Andy Armstrong a...@hexten.net wrote:
On 3 May 2009, at 20:07, Bill Ward wrote:
For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan
testers that I can't replicate. See this error report...
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Bill Ward b...@wards.net wrote:
For my module Number::Format I am getting a strange result from cpan
testers that I can't replicate. See this error report...
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/03/msg3560533.html
# Failed test 'pi with
* Chris Dolan ch...@chrisdolan.net [2009-05-03 16:25]:
If you blog because you are inspired to say something important
to the community, then I want to read it. If you blog every
time you release a module, or just because mst told you to,
then you are just lowering the signal-to-noise ratio.
