From: Jonas Bromso Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The RT raises an issue with the distribution version number not being
equal to the one in the main package version, in my case Workflow.pm
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching a code module, if changes are just
Burak Gürsoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
And reduce the number of prerequisites, if possible.
-- Johan
* Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-12T18:05:39]
Burak Gürsoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
And reduce the number of prerequisites, if possible.
If anything, expect more prereqs in the future.
--
rjbs
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Ricardo SIGNES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-12T18:05:39]
Burak Gürsoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
And reduce the number of prerequisites, if possible.
If
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo SIGNES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:51 AM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Distribution version vs. Main package version
* Paul Johnson [EMAIL
ago on Polytron
PVCS
--Original Message--
From: Ricardo SIGNES
Sender:
To: module-authors@perl.org
Sent: Nov 10, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Distribution version vs. Main package version
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
I like to be able to release
* Burak Gürsoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-11T14:25:27]
Well... You should either rename this thing or advertise more :)
I'll advertise more when it's stabler.
--
rjbs
Hello Module Authors,
I have received a RT ticket on my Workflow distribution.
The RT raises an issue with the distribution version number not being
equal to the one in the main package version, in my case Workflow.pm
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
other files. I only update package versions when code/functionality
changes, so developers
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Ricardo SIGNES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
other files. I only update
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:43:27PM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
* Jonas Brømsø Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T16:15:20]
I like to be able to release distributions without necessarily
touching a code module, if changes are just documentation, tests or
other files. I only update
* Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T17:17:22]
I'm starting to get annoyed by the extraneous commits into the revision
control system. And so I'm considering the option of not having the version
number in the file that gets checked in, but expanding it for a release.
Using
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 06:50:58PM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
* Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-10T17:17:22]
I'm starting to get annoyed by the extraneous commits into the revision
control system. And so I'm considering the option of not having the version
number in the file that
13 matches
Mail list logo
