We all love the CPAN testers and the results publised at
http://testers.cpan.org.
But recently I suddenly saw a big load of failures in one of my
packages. All these failures were for 5.11.0.
Now, 5.11.0 is a development version, and a moving target. A test
failure with blead reveals often more
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your ideas about this? Should blead test results be separated
from the other results?
Wholeheartedly, yes. It's useful to get the reports on blead, but
probably not so useful for people who just want to cruise
On 28 Jul 2008, at 15:28, Ken Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Johan Vromans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your ideas about this? Should blead test results be
separated
from the other results?
Wholeheartedly, yes. It's useful to get the reports on blead, but
probably
Johan Vromans wrote:
We all love the CPAN testers and the results publised at
http://testers.cpan.org.
Except when failure reports reflect problems in a particular
tester's environment, and not problems with the modules being
tested. (But that goes without saying, right?)
But recently I
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:31:17PM +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 28 Jul 2008, at 15:28, Ken Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What are your ideas about this? Should blead test results be separated
from the other results?
