--On Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:16:25 -0400 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Bill Chmura wrote:
Which version is recommended at this point?
this should do you well:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/software/admin/mon/devel
mon-1.1.0pre1.tar.gz
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:53:05 -0400
David Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
--On Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:16:25 -0400 Jim Trocki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Bill Chmura wrote:
Which version is recommended at this point?
this should do you well:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, David Nolan wrote:
He really should be using at least mon-1-1-0pre3 there werw a couple
significant bugs in pre1, and there have been a couple minor fixes since
then. Jim, if I tag the current code as mon-1-1-0pre4 and
mon-client-1-1-0pre3 can you put up tarballs of
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Bill Chmura wrote:
I can attempt to get the cvs version again today. I just stopped
consulting and have taken up residence in an office with a few too many
windows servers - I really want to get monitoring up so I know when to
reset them :)
dude, just hook up a watchdog
On 9/1/06, Jim Trocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok sure, and i guess we should just fork it and call the branch 1.2, or 2.0.
the head trunk we can begin calling 1.3 or 2.1, following the odd #s devel,
even #s stable paradigm. i can take care of that and the updates to the web
page and other
