Thank you all for sharing experiences and ideas.
For the moment we decided to stick to methods based on landmarks but analyze
simple leaves and leaves with exactly three lobes separately.
In addition, leaves from simple oval to heavily lobed will be analyzed jointly
with outline methods as most
R.
>
> Tina
>
>
>
> *From:* Paolo Piras [mailto:paolopir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2018 2:14 PM
> *To:* Carmelo Fruciano
> *Cc:* MORPHMET
> *Subject:* Re: [MORPHMET] digitizing very variable leaves
>
>
>
> Hi Tina,
>
> if your colleagues are i
m:* Joanna Lenarczyk [mailto:j.kowal...@botany.pl
> <j.kowal...@botany.pl>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:21 AM
> *To:* Tina Klenovšek
> *Subject:* Re: [MORPHMET] digitizing very variable leaves
>
>
>
> Hello Tina,
>
> You can try a program which does not need land
lyse outline
data and visualize variability?
Thank you again,
Tina
*From:*Joanna Lenarczyk [mailto:j.kowal...@botany.pl]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:21 AM
*To:* Tina Klenovšek
*Subject:* Re: [MORPHMET] digitizing very variable leaves
Hello Tina,
You can try a program which does not
and
species.
In which user friendly program (like MorphoJ ☺) can I analyse outline data and
visualize variability?
Thank you again,
Tina
From: Joanna Lenarczyk [mailto:j.kowal...@botany.pl]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:21 AM
To: Tina Klenovšek
Subject: Re: [MORPHMET] digitizing very variable leaves
. Ecology & Evolution
Research Professor, Anthropology
Stony Brook University
From: Tina Klenovšek <tina.klenov...@um.si>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 12:28 AM
To: f.james.rohlf <f.james.ro...@stonybrook.edu>
Cc: morphmet@morphometrics.org
Subject: RE: [MORPHMET] digitizing very
: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 3:59 AM
To: Tina Klenovšek
Subject: Re: [MORPHMET] digitizing very variable leaves
An assumption of the usual GMM methods is that shape variation is "small". I
think these leaves exceed this quite a bit! Another problem is landmarks. How
to match leaves with a
