Hi Blake,
Thanks for the feedback. Will contact you later as well.
Kind regards,
Helmi
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 1:25:45 AM UTC+8, Blake Dickson wrote:
>
> Hi Helmi,
>
> I would concur with Murat. There aren't any satisfying options for 3D
> data. The 3D landmarks from one or more
Dear Murat,
Thanks for the reply. That software screenshot looks great. It will
definitely save time if you can stack PC output, rather than doing
individual outputs and editing in Photoshop.
Have not tried R. So not an expert with that software.
Kind regards,
Helmi
On Wednesday, January
Hi Helmi,
I would concur with Murat. There aren't any satisfying options for 3D data.
The 3D landmarks from one or more angles for each extremity is really your
only option for publications. As for your final question, yes you can
output LM 'warps' for CVA, regression, or pretty much any
Dear Morphometricians,
Which kind of graphical output would be better to place when interpreting
data output? I've made an imaginary PC graph with imaginary shape for 2D
analysis. Transformation grid/wireframe show almost the same thing, except
that transformation grid shows the bending