Re: [MORPHMET] Different types of 2D and 3D image when intepreting PCA, CVA and other analysis.

Hi Blake, Thanks for the feedback. Will contact you later as well. Kind regards, Helmi On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 1:25:45 AM UTC+8, Blake Dickson wrote: > > Hi Helmi, > > I would concur with Murat. There aren't any satisfying options for 3D > data. The 3D landmarks from one or more

Re: [MORPHMET] Different types of 2D and 3D image when intepreting PCA, CVA and other analysis.

Dear Murat, Thanks for the reply. That software screenshot looks great. It will definitely save time if you can stack PC output, rather than doing individual outputs and editing in Photoshop. Have not tried R. So not an expert with that software. Kind regards, Helmi On Wednesday, January

Re: [MORPHMET] Different types of 2D and 3D image when intepreting PCA, CVA and other analysis.

Hi Helmi, I would concur with Murat. There aren't any satisfying options for 3D data. The 3D landmarks from one or more angles for each extremity is really your only option for publications. As for your final question, yes you can output LM 'warps' for CVA, regression, or pretty much any