What you see is most likely bug
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193241
The workaround is to either find file psm.xpt in your installation
directory and remove it, or do a complete uninstall and clean reinstall
of 1.3 beta.
Kai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello out there,
i am
- your p12 files might be invalid
- maybe after deleting A, the cert is not completely purged from memory.
Try to restart the application
- maybe certs in A and B have identical serial number and issuer, that
would cause confusion
- could you try to nightly Mozilla build to see whether it's
I have no real idea based on the information you provided. I suggest you
should try to debug what's happening inside that function. Maybe in your
special version you are not passing in a good directory path that could
be used by NSS to init the files.
Kai
Oskar Malm wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on
liug wrote:
How can I use the NSS tools to convert a openssl generated
key pem file to netscape key3.db ?
Thanks!
Frank
You probably can't convert it, because a pem file is a simple collection
of certs, but a key3.db is a complex database.
You might want to create a database and use
Without having looked at the code, here is a first wild guess: Maybe
what you see was caused by bug
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163605
You say you are using 1.2, but not exactly which version - 1.2 final has
not yet been released.
Builds *after* 1.2 beta have the fix for bug
OCSP: When preparing the information shown in the tabular view of cert
manager, it would be to slow to check all certificates for validity.
This is the only place where we ignore the OCSP setting. Because of
that, the check is delayed until you actually use the certificate for an
action, and
The warning ...contains some unencrypted... is shown, when at least
one component of the shown content was not obtained using https.
We also show that warning when JavaScript is used to modify the shown
content. A discussion is in
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155760
Kai
The password manager is called Wallet in Mozilla's sourcecode, that
might help you find the sources more easily.
The encryption key is stored within a profile's security database files.
I guess you will need to use the NSS library to access the key.
Mozilla calls functions PK11SDR_Encrypt and
After you received the send failure error message, please use the menu
command view / message security. This window should provide more
informtion about the availability of recipient certificates. Are all
reported as valid here?
If all those are valid, are you able to send an encrypted
Matthias Kubik wrote:
Forgot to mention that decryption of messages encrypted from my home account
with Notes works fine. It's just the other way around that doesn't work.
Matthias
Kai Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If your certificate is selected
Newsgroup Account
Setting - Security, that's my certificate which shows up for signing
and encryption.
Or is there another place to look at ?
Thanks.
Matthias
Kai Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'd bet your profile does not contain the cert required
Usually, when you import a certificate into Mozilla, each certificate
will get assigned a unique nickname. The cert stored in the internal
database will remember the association from actual cert to nickname.
The configuration in mail remembers the cert nickname.
If you are testing and doing
I think 1.0 had a bug where deleted certificates will still be listed in
certificate manager until you restart the application. You could try to
test with 1.0.1rc2.
Re signing / encryption complaining about not having a cert, it's
important that you configure both certificates in edit/mail
before it was sent to you, but it cannot be
decrypted. There are unknown problems with this encrypted message.
This is the whole dialog box I'm seeing. Any hints appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Matthias
Kai Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Does
When you imported the CA certificate, did you select to trust it? If you
open certificate manager, go the the Authorities tab, can you find that
CA certificate and use view and edit to see whether it is trusted?
If you go to Your Certificates, what is displayed in the upper part of
the
I can't really help with XPInstall either, but some other suggestions:
Could you test to use the simple approach of not using a jar/xpi file,
but simply install the DLL?
Have you tried edit/prefs/manage security devices/load/ and browse to
the PKCS#111 DLL file directly?
Are you trying with
Does the message really say cause there was no signature?
A more detailed message can be viewed when clicking broken key icon, or
by choosing view message security info from the menu. I would have
expected a message like The certificate used to encrypt the message
cannot be found, which would
John Douglass wrote:
I've developed an open-source based Certificate Authority software
package called Papyrus and previously (i.e. Netscpae 4x) I was able to
use application/x-x509-email-cert and cat a PEM cert to the browser
and it would invoke the certificate management to import the
Jason Barr wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone noticed that with 0.9.9, when you send an encrypted mail
(kudos for getting this going!) the mail which is saved in the 'Sent'
folder is not viewable, and the 'Invalid Encryption' message appears?
It appears that the message is still encrypted with the
Andrew Perry wrote:
I thought that this was fixed:
When you open up a window to Compose a new email, and you switch between
FROM accounts, that it would use the S/MIME setting of the new chosen
account ??? Currently it is trying to use the original account settings ...
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Perry wrote:
I tried sending email with the first letter caps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and it
says I dont have a cert .. but if I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... it works just
fine .. I wouldn't have thought that case would have to do anything with
it ..
I'm not sure what the correct
goku wrote:
How can I send signed (or encrypted) S/MIME emails without these buttons
(or the padlock icon)?
I mean I RTFM, went to the help section, went to the mozilla.org site and,
it clearly states that Mozilla supports S/MIME.
Inside the compose window, use the menu: Options/Security.
Regarding the section E 2, reading a message with an attachment.
Could It be confusing, that the encrypted and signed icons appear below
the word attachment?
Would it make sense to move this label above the attachment box, as it
is done in the mail compose window? If you agree, I'd suggest to
Frederick Roeber wrote:
I'm not really sure that a pen signifies signed or signed by. I'd
think it would mean written by, or maybe click here to write. I
don't have a better icon idea, though.. maybe the seal-and-ribbons
sometimes used to stand for certificate?
I like that idea, too.
Jennifer Glick wrote:
Updated Security spec based on having a security Toolbar button in Mail
Compose. The Toolbar security icon seems the best way to go since it
makes the feature more discoverable without disturbing the attachment
area.
http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/specs/security/
Jennifer Glick wrote:
Updated Security spec based on having a security Toolbar button in Mail
Compose. The Toolbar security icon seems the best way to go since it
makes the feature more discoverable without disturbing the attachment
area.
http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/specs/security/
"Nelson B. Bolyard" wrote:
NSS has an S/MIME tool kit.
It simply hasn't yet been integrated into Mozilla or N6.
Any volunteers?
I'm interested to get this feature in.
I'm not sure whether I'll able to do it (alone), but at least I want to
learn how much work it would be for me.
As I have
27 matches
Mail list logo
