Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-31 Thread Nelson B. Bolyard
Wan-Teh Chang wrote: I finally found the email we sent to the PKCS #11 Working Group. It is archived at http://islab.oregonstate.edu/emails/cryptoki-01/0410. I emailed you a copy of this on Tuesday. Did you receive it?

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-30 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
Wan-Teh Chang wrote: Christoph Brueckner wrote: hi Julien, thanks for your reply. Julien Pierre wrote: At this time softoken is still tied to NSS. It requires an initialization string to be passed to C_Initialize. If you can make your other applicaitons pass that string, you might be able

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-29 Thread Christoph Brueckner
hi Wan-Teh, thanks for your reply. I am looking for the documentation of that initialization string. I will post the URL here once I find it. Do you have any other documentation for softoken or the ckfw? Please tell me where i can find it or send it to me via email. After reading the

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-29 Thread Christoph Brueckner
hi Jens, uff, i thought i was the only one one this planet who's struggling with the softoken ;-) But now i have it actually running! Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: My suspicion was the same as yours so I searched through secmod.db and found a string containing the path to my profile since the

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-29 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Christoph Brueckner wrote: hi Jens, uff, i thought i was the only one one this planet who's struggling with the softoken ;-) But now i have it actually running! Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: My suspicion was the same as yours so I searched through secmod.db and found a string containing the path

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-29 Thread Ian McGreer
Christoph Brueckner wrote: Ok. But why does softoken and builtin module only export the C_GetFunctionList function? I thought softoken and builtin are real PKCS#11 Modules. Why don't they export functions like C_Initialize, and all the other PKCS#11 functions directly? Instead softoken exports

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-28 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Christoph, Interesting, I was trying to do a similar thing and posted to the group but got no reply. I've gotten partway down the road that Julien describes. Read on for more details. Christoph Brueckner wrote: hi Julien, thanks for your reply. Julien Pierre wrote: At this time softoken is

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-28 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
Christoph Brueckner wrote: hi Julien, thanks for your reply. Julien Pierre wrote: At this time softoken is still tied to NSS. It requires an initialization string to be passed to C_Initialize. If you can make your other applicaitons pass that string, you might be able to use it. What is

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-27 Thread Christoph Brueckner
hi Julien, thanks for your reply. Julien Pierre wrote: At this time softoken is still tied to NSS. It requires an initialization string to be passed to C_Initialize. If you can make your other applicaitons pass that string, you might be able to use it. What is the syntax of that

Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-24 Thread Christoph Brueckner
hi, NSS is using the softoken as internal pkcs#11 module. Is it possible to turn the softoken into a real standalone pkcs#11 module, which can be used by other applications beside Netscape/Mozilla? What is this cryptoki framework (ckfw) all about? Is it possible to integrate the softoken into

Re: Using Softoken as standalone pkcs#11 module?

2003-01-24 Thread Julien Pierre
Christoph Brueckner wrote: hi, NSS is using the softoken as internal pkcs#11 module. Is it possible to turn the softoken into a real standalone pkcs#11 module, which can be used by other applications beside Netscape/Mozilla? What is this cryptoki framework (ckfw) all about? Is it possible to